Welcome to English Literature and Linguistics, Join Online Classes (Only For Ladies)

MA ENGLISH LITERATURE

Wednesday, 18 December 2019

Aristotle Poetics past papers Punjab university Criticism 2012 to 2019 SUPPLY, 2020



Aristotle Poetics Past papers Punjab university criticism 2012 to 2019 SUPPLY, 2020

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW




2011 ANNUAL
ARISTOTLE DISCUSSION ON TRAGEDY IS DETERMINED BY HIS CONCEPTION OF HUMAN NATURE N SOCIAL RELATION DISCUSS.

2012 annual
Q ; “ poetry is something more philosophic and of graver importance than history , since its statements are of the nature of universals ” estimate the relative importance of poetry and philosophy in the light of the above statement.

2012 supply
Q ; " Aristotle's statement about the end of tragedy - purgation or catharsis has been so endlessly miss understood, so uncritically assumed to be true " . Discuss

2013 Annual
Q; discuss Aristotle's concept of a tragic hero in the light of his book poetics.

2013 supply
Q; " through pity and fear tragedy effects the purgation of these emotions. " what is your opinion? Discuss in detail.


2014 annual
Q ; discuss at length the Criterion for a tragic Hero laid down by Aristotle in poetics.

2014 supply
Q; " tragedy is essentially an imitation not of persons but of action and life, of happiness and misery " . How far Would you agree to this statement?

2015 annual
Q ; critically analyse Aristotle's concept of a tragic Hero.

2015 supply
Q ; " A tragedy, then, is the imitation of an action that is serious, having magnitude, complete in itself; in language embellished with each kind of artistic ornament, each kind brought in separately in the parts of the world; in dramatic not in narrative form; with incidents arousing pity and fear where with two please it's catharsis of such emotions"
Explain Aristotle's concept.

2016 annual
Q; what are the major features of Aristotle concepts in poetics ?

2016 supply
Q; " tragedy contains incidents arousing pity and fear, wherewith to accomplish its catharsis of such emotions" how this comes about.

2017 annual
Q; what are the seven characteristics aristotle uses to define tragedy in poetics?

2017 supply
Q; aristotle define tragedy as the most refined version of poetry dealing with lofty matters and comedy as the most refined version of poetry dealing with base matters. Discuss with support of examples in poetics.

2018 annual
Q; aristotle redefines poetry not as an imitation of some ideal reality, are more creative endeavour to improve upon different forms of reality. Prove or refute the statement.

2018 supply
Q; Is Aristotle concept of tragedy still relevant today?

(2019 Annual)
Define and discuss the characteristics of tragedy bought about Aristotle.

(2019 supply)

What is the significance of pity and fear in light of Aristotle poetics. 

Past papers Novel Twilight in Delhi 2019 TO 2012

Past papers Novel Twilight in Delhi

Q.Twilight in Delhi is a novel about colonial arrival in india and its consequent tensions .
(2019annual)


Q.Discuss some of the currents symbols in Twilght in Delhi.(2018annual)

Q.Twilight in Delhi is  about  fall of Mughal and Muslim culture .Exlemplify(2018 supply )


Q; Twilight in Delhi anticipates anxieties of relationship between a nostalgic native and potent invader?
( 2017 annual)


Q; what major themes are treated in ahmed Ali's novel , twilight in Delhi ? ( 2012 annual ) 

Q; "My purpose in writing the novel was to depict a phase of our national life and the decay of a whole culture, a particular mode of hot and living " discuss this statement with reference to ahemad ali novelnovel twilight in Delhi.
( 2012 supply ) 

Q; The novel twilight in Delhi does not remain the story of delhi alone, but is simultaneously the story of the life of mankind. Comment.( 2013 annual )

Q; Twilight in Delhi shows the decay of Mughal kingship or Muslim civilisation. Comment
( 2013 supply) 

Q; About twilight in Delhi mohammad hasan askari says " I cannot recall any novel a short story in Urdu where nature has thus come to life ,or in which nature has played such a role in making the novel so meaningful"
( 2014 annual) 

Q; Bonam Dobree, is of the view that twilight in Delhi lakes readers skillfully intimately into the details of muslim life in delhi during the earlier part of this century.
( 2014 supply)

Q; The moralizing  of the defeated is a powerful emotional sachem twilight in Delhi . Comment
( 2015 annual) 

Q; Twilight in Delhi is a novel about wasted nostalgia of Mughal Empire. Comment.
( 2015 supply)

Q; In twilight in Delhi author paints of very balanced picture of the joys and sorrows of the  people of Delhi. Elaborate? ( 2016 annual) 

Q; Twilight in Delhi is about decline of muslim culture. Comment ( 2016 supply) 


Tuesday, 17 December 2019

PARADISE LOST past papers poetry 2019 to 2013

2019
Q: how far do you agree that Milton was with the devil's party without knowing it?
Q:write critical note on
temptation scene in paradise lost book 9
2018 supplementry
Q:discuss eve's role as a seductress role in paradise lost?

2018
Q:critically analyze Satan's character in the light of his speeches in Book 1 of Milton

 2017 supplementry
Q: Milton deals with complex theme of bringing a balance between good and evil.discuss with reference to your reading of Milton

 2017
Q: Discuss the rise and fall of Satan in Paradise lost.

2016  supplementry
Q: critically examine the temptation scene in book 9 of paradise lost

 2016 supplementry
Q: It is a paradox that the obdurate pride in Satan makes him a hero and a villain?What is your point of view?
 2016
Do you find Satan attractive or repulsive?Draw on you reading of the text to prove your point of view.

2015.
 Discuss Eve's character in the light of Temptation Scene in Book IX.

2015 supplementry
"the epic value of Paradise Lost is centred in the character and achievements of Satan" do you agree?

 2014. "Paradise Lost shows Milton as Christian Humanist using all the resources of the European literary tradition that had come down to him --- biblical, classical, medieval and Renaissance."

 2013.

How far do your agree to the statement that in Paradise Lost Milton has justified the ways of God to men? Explain you answer with arguments.

Iago, human in body but satanic in mind

Iago, human in body but satanic in mind
The world of Hamlet is possessed by rottenness in all while that of Othello by rottenness in one. Othello is one of those Shakespearean plays where action belongs more to the antagonist than to the protagonist. Iago, a Spartan dog, a Machiavelli, a Shakespearean Oswald, a bad man of supreme intellectual power, is more evil-minded than Goethe’s Mephistopheles and more wicked than Milton’s Satan. In the words of Dowden, “The same malignant power that lurks in the eye and fill with venom the fangs of the serpent would seem to have brought into existence of Iago”. He comes before us as a cunning hypocrite, an evil genius, a conscienceless liar, a self aggrandizing villain, a relentless revenger, a motiveless villain and a resourceful devil. If the play is a tragedy, it is chiefly due to Iago. Had there been no Iago, the world of Othello would have been an earthly paradise reigned by the bliss of love and matrimony.
True and exact profile of Iago’s person is almost impossible. However general introduction of this abominable villain is that he is a venation serving Othello as his ancient and is rejected by Othello as his lieutenant in the presence of Cassio. This rejection becomes the main motive behind his jealousy and enmity against Othello. After this rejection he serves Othello to serve his own turn upon him, “In following him I follow but myself”.
By nature Iago is a cynic as he himself admits before Desdemona,
“For I am nothing, if not critical”
He is also jealous by nature. He gives the proof of his jealousy when he finds Othello and Desdemona united happily in Cyprus and kissing each other. He blurts out,
“”O, You are well-turned now but I’ll set down the pegs that make this music as honest as I am”
Iago is an evil genius. He is as good a judge of others as bad they are of him. He is a perfect hypocrite and cheat. All other characters keep him calling fair and honest till the end of the play which exposes his true self. He judges his victims and their persons quite accurately. He perfectly judges Othello’s nature when he declares,
“The moor a free and open nature too thinks men honest that but seem to be so”
This is exactly what Othello proves to be. Similarly he judges Roderigo well when he declares, “Thus do I ever make my fool my purse”. That is also proven true. So whatever Iago says about other characters is true and what other characters say about him proves fatally false. Iago is a symbol of false appearance, disguised goodness and duality. As he himself says, “I am not what I am”. He is a perfect foil to Othello. Iago has white complexion which is a deceptive cover over his inner blackness, while Othello has dark complexion which is a dark veil over his inner fairness. Both of them are contrary to their appearances. Iago is a black devil in white skin and Othello is a fair human being in black skin.
Iago’s malignity and jealousy are most debated and debatable aspects of his character. First we take up jealousy which is an innate and essential part of his evil nature. In order to highlight its innateness, Iago’s jealousy can be compared with Othello’s. The chief difference between Othello and Iago as jealous persons is that Othello is jealous due to the infectious company and conspiracy of a devil. He never suspects and doubts unless he is provoked and poisoned by a cunning devil. Jealousy is not a chronic malady in his heart nor it is allowed to persist there. As he asserts, “Away at once with love or jealosy”. It is noble rather than jealous of Othello to put either love or jealousy to end. If there is a jealous husband in Othello, it is Iago not Othello. Othello’s jealousy is an infection injected into his blood by jealous and malicious Iago.
On the other hand Iago is jealous by nature. In fact he is a cynic by birth as he himself confesses, “I am nothing if not critical”. His jealousy is an off shoot of his cynic and negative nature. It is his second nature to suspect all and always. For instance he suspects Emilia both with Othello and Cassio. “I do suspect the lustful moor hath leap’d into my seat”. “I fear Cassio with my nightcap too”. The greatest evidence of his jealous and abusive nature is provided by Iago himself when he confesses to Othello thus, “It is my nature’s  plague to spy into abuses and oft my jealousy shapes faults that are not” So Othello’s jealousy s like a human disease which is remediable while that of Iago is like an innate trait of nature which is integral and incurable.
Similarly, Iago’s malignity is motiveless and unjustified most of so called motives are either imaginary or false. Othello, Cassio, Desdemona, Roderigo and Emilia, all are innocent victims of his villainy and depravity. That is why Coleridge calls him a motive hunting villain. As a matter of fact Iago is a devil who neither has nor needs to have any motives for his devilish ideas and acts.
In short, Iago is an evil genius, his existence on the earth is a bane, a deathly sickness, the longer he abides, the sooner humanity will perish from the earth. His deeds are replica of those of Satan. His words are the echo of Satan’s speeches. Iagos’s words, “Though that his joy be joy, yet throw such changes of vexation on it as it may lose some colour” Sounds like the counseling words of Satan to his followers.
“To do aught good never will be our task,
But ever to do ill our sole delight”
If not Satan, Iago is surely one of disciples of Satan, one of the fallen spirits who wander on the earth with the sole objective of obliteration of mankind.


The Faerie Queen by Edmund Spencer: Summary and Critical Analysis

The Faerie Queen by Edmund Spencer: Summary and Critical Analysis
☘️🌸👇🍁🙋‍♂️🌿🌿🌿
Edmund Spencer's prime motive in writing The Fairie Queene was to demonstrate virtues of a gentleman or a noble person. The virtues were to be illustrated by a series of adventures of the twelve knights who represented one virtue each among the twelve gentlemanly virtues of King Arthur before he was king. For instance, Red Cross Knight in the first book represents holiness and the rest of the five knights which Spenser completed only in six books represented temperance, friendship, chastity, justice and courtesy.


Spenser's period of the Renaissance was greatly interested in the idea of a perfect gentleman. The typical Renaissance man would be open and critical minded, studious and adventurous, practical and talented in many disciplines, and so on. But Spenser added strong moral and religious qualifications in the idea of the gentleman. Unlike the model man of the medieval age, who was supposed to be saintly, and also unlike the entirely Renaissance model of intellectual man, however, Spenser's model was a mixture of the moral man whose moral and spiritual virtues are practically tested and verified in the corporeal world. Spenser is a synthesizer. The people of his time were interested in reading the "Book of God's words" (the Bible) and pass their exams in the "Book of God's works" (Nature/world). His gentleman is one who has proved himself a worthy scholar, soldier as well as a courtier. So, Spenser is a Renaissance Christian Idealist in this sense also.

The virtue of holiness needs some explanation, since in modern parlance this quality would not normally be associated with a military man but rather with a churchman. It must be remembered that throughout medieval and Renaissance, literature books were written and sermons preached on the "Christian warrior " signifying that every good Christian was to "gird on the Armour of Christ'' in the fight against sin. For Spenser, then, the term suggests righteousness. The virtues, even of truth and holiness of Book I Canto I, were medieval Christian ideals to be put to practice by the Renaissance man.

At the beginning of the story the Red Cross is a young man aspiring to holiness. But until now his virtue is not yet tried and verified. So he commits mistakes before he achieves perfection. This knight represents one of the moral virtues required in the perfect gentleman like Prince Arthur.

Una, whom the knight is pledged to serve and defend, stands for truth, or the one true religion ("una vera fides" means "truth is one"). Book I is the story of their joint venture; their setting out together, battle against error and hypocrisy (canto I), then their separation, their reunion, success and return. The symbolism in the costuming of the hero and heroine tells us that the battle is not only an adventure of a strong man, but also the venture of a strong and moral mind. It is a Christian, Protestant, English, Chivalric as well as a Renaissance humanist battle against evil forces that stand on the way of becoming a man with all these virtues. The knight bears a "bloody" cross, the emblem of Christian faith; the lady is gowned in white for purity and innocence, though she wears a veil to suggest that truth is not always plain to see.

The encounter with monster error in the dark wood suggests the type of trial constantly facing the man who aspires to righteousness, but who is untried in the ways of the world. The tangling coils of the she-monster's tail and her vomit of stinking books and pamphlets almost overcome the hero, who is only saved by the counsel of truth and the force of faith. Strength, courage, and good intentions are not enough to meet this trial. The seemingly pious hermit who offers his humble shelter to the Red Cross Knight and Una, Archimago, the arch-magician, stands for Hypocrisy. The knight's blunder in this episode, when he considers himself to be acting on high moral principles, is succumbing to the machinations of a vicious tempter who is apparently good but actually evil, the chief manner of the devil's behavior. His weakness is a sign of inexperience, a failure to distinguish appearance from reality.

On the level of allegory of the history of mankind, the episode signifies the fall of man in the Garden of Eden, or man's loss of his original purity through the subtle persuasion of Satan. Finally, according to the historical allegory the separation of the Red Cross Knight and Una through the machinations of Archimango stands for the outliving of Protestantism and the reestablishment of Catholicism in the reign of Queen Mary (Mary Tudor, or "Bloody Mary"). Archimago, the instrument of the separation, is identified as the pope, and Duessa who figures in following episode, represents Queen Mary of Scotland. The evil characters are historically as well as symbolically Catholic people.

Spenser's recurrent concern with glory, Gloriana and the like also reminds us of the Renaissance concept of reputation through the pursuit of knowledge and adventure, which was the passionate desire of every Renaissance man. Spenser had, however, Christianized the concept of glory as an achievement of moral life, too. In Faerie Queene, Queen Elizabeth symbolizes glory. Prince Arthur represents Magnificence, which includes all virtues. Magnificence means 'great' in thought, speech and action. If glory is the name or achievement, which Queen Elizabeth had already got, Magnificence is the quality or potential that Prince Arthur had to prove in order to win her hand. In the Faerie Queene Spenser assumed that the Queen was already perfect with glory (beside all other necessary virtues within it), and he wanted to demonstrate how the would-be king (Earl of Leisester/Arthur) had adventure to prove his gentlemanly/knightly virtues, cast in form of twelve adventures by different knights. But only six (and a part) books were completed. The combination of the 12 gentlemanly moral virtues makes up magnificence, which is required to win the love of the glorious queen. The epic was on one level a eulogy praising the queen and her favorite/lover as the epitomes of all human virtues. But Spenser also wanted to "instruct with delight" the "learned throng" of his time, showing them low their prince had achieved the qualities of "a gentleman or noble person".

Spencer was a celebrant of English nationality, empire and royalty. The Faerie Queen is at one level a tribute to his patron queen and the Earl of Leicester as well as a praise of the brave knights, and faithful citizens of England. At times the poet appears to be a mere flatterer. He identifies Queen Elizabeth with mythical goddesses as an embodiment of all perfection and as a paragon of all virtues. He calls her, Gloriana or the empress of all nobleness; Belephoebe, or the princess of all sweetness and beauty; Marcella, or the lady of all compassion and grace; Britomart or the armed votary of all pure; Cynthia the poetess and Tranquil in leaning a queen who was a goddess heavenly bright/ Mirror of grace and majesty drive” (The invocation to Faerie & Queen). The eulogy is too much sometimes!

But the Faerie Queen is not only a flattery. Spenser was a Renaissance man, influenced by Renaissance new Platonism and humanism, a celebrator of Physical beauty, love, romance and adventure, though he was a profound idealist and analyst of good and evil. The Faerie Queen is basically a romance on its surface, a romance about love and adventure of “brave (British) knights and faithful ladies;” Fierce wares and faithful loves shall moralize my song” (stanza 1). It is in this sense a romantic epic full of adventures and marvels, dragons, witches, giants, battles, enchanted trees and castles. It has intricate plots, amazing episodes heroic characters, elaborate descriptions and so on. But due to the allegory suggested by names of character and places and historical, religious and mythical allusions, the epic also teaches moral lessons along with the delight of surface romance.

As Spenser stated in his letter to Sir Walter Raleigh, The Faerie Queen was also supposed to be a “courtesy book”. He intended to teach his learned reader and the people the virtues of a perfect gentleman through its moral, religious and politico-historical allegories behind, the delightful romantic story. He said.” The general end (purpose) of the entire book is to fashion a gentleman or noble person in virtuous discipline.” He planned to write twelve books; each one would be an adventure of a knight representing one moral virtue which he would prove by fighting against the evils in the course of the adventure. The first book, for example, narrates the romance, adventure of a British knight who represents ‘holiness’ on the moral level. Saint George, the patron saint of England on the legendary level, and one of the qualities of the earl of Leicester (on the historical level). He could complete only six books narrating the adventure of six knights representing 1.Holiness, 2.Temperance, 3.Chastity 4.Friendship, 5.Justice, and 6.Courtesy. The other six are never mentioned, and Spenser didn’t write those planned books. All the twelve knights were supposed to represent the twelve qualities of a noble gentleman whose perfect example was the earl of Leicester. The fairy queen sends these knightly on different adventures as opportunities to prove their gentlemanliness and knightly qualities.

For The Faerie Queen, Spencer originated a nine line verse stanza, now known as the Spenserian stanza – the first eight lines are iambic pentameter, and the ninth, iambic hexameter, the rhyme scheme is ababbcbcc. The melodious verse, combined with Spenser’s sensuous imagery and deliberate use of archaic language evocative of the medieval past (as in the earlier Shepherd's Calendar), serves not only to relieve the high moral seriousness of his theme but to create a complex panorama of great splendor. Spenser’s lush and expansive imagination and vigorous approach to the structure made him a powerful influence on John Milton and the romantic poets, including John Keats and Percy Bysshe Shelley.