Welcome to English Literature and Linguistics, Join Online Classes (Only For Ladies)

MA ENGLISH LITERATURE

Sunday 29 September 2019

Generative Grammar

Generative Grammar
In the study of phrasal structure NP and VP have been discussed.Now its time to go ahead to see how words are interwoven in to b the fabric of these finite rules.next in this line is PP prepositional phrase.
PP
p+NP
or PP(P+NP)
For example "Off the shore".
  structure will be
                  PP
                /    \
            p        NP
                     /   \
                   art    N
similarly
        Under the feet
            pp
           /   \
        p       NP
                /   \
               art  N
these points should be kept in mind whether you are student or a teacher.
NP can only be formed by
NP (det+adjective+N or det+N or N)
VP (v+NP,v+PP,v+Adverb)
PP (p+NP)
these are important not only for sentence tree but also for transformational Grammar or surface and deep structure.
Sentence Structure
Generative grammar is based on simple rules
"All and only"
and
"Infinite and finite"
All and only means only pure grammatical sentences are dealt but all grammatical sentences in the type of Grammar.
secondly
through few simple rules we can form or construct uncountable sentences.so that infinite and finite means.
A sentence must has a subject and a verb.two constituents are necessary thats why it is called only grammatical sentences.
for example
The labourers do the work.
-------------------   -----------------
        |                          |
      NP                      VP
there are two constituents. and the word that determines a constituent is called head.so Noun and verb are the heads in the example that is given above.
1    The sun rises in the east.
                    S
                  /   \
            NP         VP
            / \          /   \
        art   N       v     PP
                                /   \
                              p     NP
                                     /   \
                                   art   N

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


be well

character sketch of desdemona OthelloBy_Shakespeare

#Othello_By_Shakespeare 

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


Q:Too much of goodness leAd #Desdemona to her tragic ending. Agree/Disagree..

The innocent being of Desdemona as a tragic victim suggests her naivety, feminine disposition, child like qualities and unspoiled soul. Desdemona can be seen as both a tragic victim but also a tragic heroine: she endures suffering that is greatly out of proportion to her mistakes but also lacks the wisdom to see that her effort to reunite Othello and Cassio as friends is the background to Iago’s manipulation of Othello. Thus Desdemona could be seen as the traditional stereotypes which very much shocked the Venetian audience of its time. Her outspoken nature is a key characteristic that critics such as Garner believe displays hamartia thereby presenting Desdemona as a tragic heroine not a victim.
This can clearly be seen when she is first mentioned in Act I Scene III through her father Brabantio, “A maiden never bold, Of spirit so still and quiet that her motion blushed at herself”, who immediately depicts her as a typical Venetian woman: Desdemona contrasts this description when she enters in ignoring her father’s wishes to be with the man she loves, “And so much duty as my mother showed to you, preferring you before her father, so much I challenge that I may profess due to the Moor my lord.” Shakespeare incorporates this by using linguistic and structural techniques, which include references to colours such as white symbolising purity and innocence as well as the use of Emilia as a foil to Desdemona. Here Iago uses the phrase “white ewe”, through the use of this colour the audience associates Desdemona as good, pure and innocent, however later on Desdemona is juxtaposed with Othello who is referred to as a “black ram”. This suggests Othello is dark and hellish and will in some way tarnish the heavenly Desdemona who is a picture of perfection.
Desdemona’s first impression is not one of innocence but wit and open trust displayed towards Iago, thus highlighting the ability for Iago to exploit this relationship. At the point when Desdemona is awaiting the arrival of Othello in Cyprus (“O heavy ignorance! Thou paisest the worst the best. But what praise couldst thou bestow on a deserving woman indeed?”) her jesting with Iago depicts her intelligence and bold minded character (through her questioning of Iagos’ logic). This aptitude to speak her mind differs greatly with the ideological image of a Venetian woman who typically would not ever rise above her husband or jest in such a manner as seen here. Shakespeare uses Cassio’s adoration of Desdemona by alluding to the heavens and God, this dichotomy of heaven Desdemona and hell Iago is depicted many times throughout the play. Iago’s soliloquies consistently reference to hell and sin helping to depict Desdemona as innocent and helpless, we are shown that Iago is determined to exploit the goodness of Desdemona to enact revenge upon Othello: “When devils will the blackest sin put on, they do suggest at first with heavenly shows As I do now”. This is very important as here Desdemona can be established as a victim due to Iago using her to get to Othello, on the other hand this does highlight Desdemona’s [ iv ] hubristic nature. As in her ambition to be more than just a proud domestic women to Othello she tries to press into his military sphere and it is this nature that Iago does to some degree exploit.
While Desdemona may be an exception to the Venetian Woman expected of the time she is certainly dominated by men in the patriarchal society of the 16th century, depicted through the male characters interaction and domination of Desdemona, but also Emilia and Bianca. A feminist interpretation would state how Desdemona has been bullied into submission by the male characters (Iago and Othello in particular); this is set up in Act I Scene I as Iago refers to her as a possession (belonging to her father before the marriage and Othello after), “Look to your house, your daughter and your bags! Thieves, thieves!” As legally women had no individual identity free of men and thus Desdemona strived to break free from this convention. When Brabantio shouts at Othello “O thou foul thief! Where hast thou stowed my daughter?” This idea of a patriarchal society is referred to by Rattray Taylor who comments on how Desdemona’s rebelliousness seen with her out spoken character is due to Brabantios immense power over her and therefore her marriage to Othello and need to make Cassio and Othello friends again has all stemmed from Desdemona wanting to play the same role as men in Venetian Society. Desdemona’s innocence can clearly be seen when she is juxtaposed with Emilia who recognizes her own powerless and objectified nature, “They eat us hungerly, and when they are full. They belch us”, yet she proposes a quid pro quo relationship in order to ensure her husband’s exclusive sexual access, “then let them use us well; else let them know”. However, Desdemona shows unswerving loyalty throughout the play and even in her last dying breath absolves Othello of her murder.
Innocence can clearly be seen as soon as Othello mentions how “she loved me for the dangers I had pass’d” conveying both the childlike qualities as she has very little life experience due to the sheltering from Brabantio, as well as her lack of contemplation in regard to Othello’s “witchcraft”. This perceives the idea that the “angel” Desdemona has not considered the social implications of marriage to a ‘Moor’, however being in such a powerful position Othello is not just any black man to the Venetians and the Senators of Cyprus. Describing Othello’s inner beauty and not caring about his outward looks “She saw Othello’s visage in her mind” this honest and innocent language utilized in asserting herself in front of the Senate was criticised by Rymer who comments that ‘a noble Venetian lady…murdered…for being a fool’. This suggests that in fact it is Desdemona’s hamartia that puts her at fault for her death; however she is innocent in that her feelings for Othello made her want to marry him, yet through her naivety or need for power (suggested by Rattray) she was a “strumpet” who in marrying Othello caused her own downfall. Thereby “she was a strumpet who lacked morals” upsetting the idea of her being an innocent and tragic victim. In the preceding time leading up to her death Desdemona asks Emilia to put the white wedding sheets on the bed, yet Othello comments earlier in that “Forth of my heart those charms, thine eyes, are blotted. Thy bed, lust-stained, shall with lust’s blood be spotted”. This can either suggest that Othello has already taken Desdemona’s virginity or that her guilty “lustful” blood will stain the sheets with the later being the more plausible option. Yet we could see Othello as guilty for awakening Desdemona’s newly found sexuality and Othello therefore feels partly responsible for her supposed affair with Cassio. The innocence of Desdemona can be illustrated here as she may not have consummated her marriage yet she was prepared for a sexual relationship as can be seen with their open displays of affection towards one another in the film adaption by Trevor Nunn.
Desdemona is to an extent an innocent tragic victim as she is manipulated by a male dominated society in the form of Iago and Othello, this can be seen with her submission as Othello smothers and kills her. Her innocence can also be seen as she is a victim of her hubristic nature (this is her hamartia) due to her trying to act out of a male dominated society. On the other hand in doing this she marries Othello and triggers her own downfall, as well as this she fails to recognise that she is not following the Venetian idea of a woman and as a result causes herself to become a tragic victim as she can to some extent be seen as too innocent and good. However ultimately the idea of Desdemona not consummating her marriage, her juxtaposition with Emilia (who realises it’s a give and take relationship with her husband) and Desdemona’s pure shock at the idea of adultery clearly highlighting that she is indeed an innocent tragic victim.

Cardinal VOWEL SYSTEM

Cardinal Vowel System
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


Cardinal vowel is basically a system or mechanism for the description of vowel sound in English.
The idea was generated in 1918 by British phonetician when Daniel Jones gave an idea about primary Cardinal vowel system and then he talked about secondary Cardinal vowel.
Cardinal vowels are decided on the basis of auditory abilities of the vocal sound.
Eight corners were given of the tongue, it starts from high position, then mid high, mid low and low.
.......................... => High
\........................| => Mid High
\......................| => Mid Low
\....................| => Low
( Position of tongue)
These are the four corner of the front and back of the tongue.
Cardinal vowels are a linguistic construction devised by Daniel Jones to organize a consistent vowel sound classification.
It is based on two possible tongue position.
1: Front to back
2: High to low
=> Front to back:
It signifies the position of the tongue that range from farthest forward at teeth to furthest backward at the throat.
=> High to low:
It signifies the positions of the tongue that range from the closest to the the palette of the mouth to the furthest from the palette in vowel formation.

Friday 27 September 2019

#THREE_MAIN_TYPES_OF_MEDIEVAL_PLAYS▪-----▪------▪-----▪-----▪------▪-----▪-----▪-----▪-----▪-----▪-----▪-----▪#PLAYA play, as most of you know, is where live actors get on a stage and act out a story in front of an audience. During Medieval times most plays were religious and were used to teach people about the Bible, the lives of saints, or how to live your life the right way. #TYPES_of_Medieval_PlaysThere were three different types of plays preformed during medieval times;1. The Mystery Plays2. The Miracle Plays3. The Morality Plays#Mystery_Plays:Mystery plays were stories taken from the Bible. Each play had four or five different scenes or acts. The priests and monks were the actors. Each scene or act was preformed at a different place in town and the people moved from one stage to the next to watch the play. The play usually ended outside the church so that the people would go to church and hear a sermon after watching the play.#Miracle_Plays:The Miracle play was about the life or actions of a saint, usually about the actions that made that person a saint. One popular Miracle play was about Saint George and the dragon.#Morality_Plays:Morality plays were designed to teach people a lesson in how to live their life according to the rules of the church.Sometimes these plays had elaborate sets, sometimes no sets at all. It didn't seem to matter. The people attended these plays. They didn't have to, but it was a break from their normal daily lives.|Prayers|Research & Presentation:

##THREE_MAIN_TYPES_OF_MEDIEVAL_PLAYS
▪-----▪------▪-----▪-----▪------▪-----▪-----▪-----▪-----▪-----▪-----▪-----▪

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


#PLAY
A play, as most of you know, is where live actors get on a stage and act out a story in front of an audience. During Medieval times most plays were religious and were used to teach people about the Bible, the lives of saints, or how to live your life the right way.
#TYPES_of_Medieval_Plays
There were three different types of plays preformed during medieval times;
1. The Mystery Plays
2. The Miracle Plays
3. The Morality Plays
#Mystery_Plays:
Mystery plays were stories taken from the Bible. Each play had four or five different scenes or acts. The priests and monks were the actors. Each scene or act was preformed at a different place in town and the people moved from one stage to the next to watch the play. The play usually ended outside the church so that the people would go to church and hear a sermon after watching the play.
#Miracle_Plays:
The Miracle play was about the life or actions of a saint, usually about the actions that made that person a saint. One popular Miracle play was about Saint George and the dragon.
#Morality_Plays:
Morality plays were designed to teach people a lesson in how to live their life according to the rules of the church.
Sometimes these plays had elaborate sets, sometimes no sets at all. It didn't seem to matter. The people attended these plays. They didn't have to, but it was a break from their normal daily lives.
|Prayers|
Research & Presentation:
#TheAdmin
▪-----▪------▪-----▪-----▪------▪-----▪-----▪-----▪-----▪-----▪-----▪-----▪
#PLAY
A play, as most of you know, is where live actors get on a stage and act out a story in front of an audience. During Medieval times most plays were religious and were used to teach people about the Bible, the lives of saints, or how to live your life the right way.
#TYPES_of_Medieval_Plays
There were three different types of plays preformed during medieval times;
1. The Mystery Plays
2. The Miracle Plays
3. The Morality Plays
#Mystery_Plays:
Mystery plays were stories taken from the Bible. Each play had four or five different scenes or acts. The priests and monks were the actors. Each scene or act was preformed at a different place in town and the people moved from one stage to the next to watch the play. The play usually ended outside the church so that the people would go to church and hear a sermon after watching the play.
#Miracle_Plays:
The Miracle play was about the life or actions of a saint, usually about the actions that made that person a saint. One popular Miracle play was about Saint George and the dragon.
#Morality_Plays:
Morality plays were designed to teach people a lesson in how to live their life according to the rules of the church.
Sometimes these plays had elaborate sets, sometimes no sets at all. It didn't seem to matter. The people attended these plays. They didn't have to, but it was a break from their normal daily lives.

Monday 23 September 2019

MOURNING BECOMES ELECTRA SHORT QUESTIONS

Eugene O’Neill
MENU
RECENTLY ANSWERED QUESTIONS
MOURNING BECOMES ELECTRA

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


What is the relationship between Ezra and Christine?
The relationship between Ezra and Christine is . . . complicated. The play trilogy, Mourning Becomes Electra, by Eugene O'Neill, is set in New England at the of the Civil War. At the opening of the...
1 Educator Answer

MOURNING BECOMES ELECTRA
Examine the conflict between personal will vs. Puritan society in Mourning Becomes Electra.
For O'Neill, the Puritan atmosphere that encourages a lack of individual openness about one's own condition as well as a desire to be perceived as socially acceptable and socially sanctioned...
1 Educator Answer

MOURNING BECOMES ELECTRA
What is the significance of the title "Mourning Becomes Electra?"
The title is intended to remind the reader of the ancient tragedies by Aeschylus and Euripides about the children of the House of Atreus. The plot evokes the Atreides' story by both its tragic...
1 Educator Answer

MOURNING BECOMES ELECTRA
What is the significance of title the 'Mourning Becomes Electra'?
The title works on two different levels; on an aural level, O'Neill makes it sound like the title refers to a positive rebirth and transformation. One could think of the image of "morning" becoming...
2 Educator Answers

MOURNING BECOMES ELECTRA
Which kind of relationship exists between mother and daughter in Mourning Becomes Electra by Eugene O'Neill?
This play is an "updated" version of the Greek Tragedy Electra. Both Sophocles and Euripides wrote plays about this daughter of King Agamemnon, who was killed by his wife Clytemnestra upon...
2 Educator Answers

MOURNING BECOMES ELECTRA
Discuss "Mourning Becomes Electra" as a modern tragedy. How is this drama is different from a Greek tragedy?
This play is actually made up of 3 different plays, a trilogy: The Homecoming, The Hunted, and The Haunted. To begin, then, let's define "tragedy": "a dramatic composition, often in verse,...

Federal urdu university past papers poetry

Q 1- Discuss chauser's art of characterization
Comment upon the character of the wife of bath?
Q2- Is chauser thr first story teller in english poetry doscuss?
Comment upon the realism of chauser?
Q3- The glory of chaucer's The Knight's tale lies in the splendor and vivid description Elaborate ?
Write a note on the femle charcters in chaucers canterbury tales?
Q- chauser's work in the prologue to the canterbury tales has been cmpared to a gallery of picture discuss with the evidences from tge characters in the prologue supporting with the textual references??
Pope
Q1- what insught do we get into fashionable  london life frm the rape of the lock ? Discuss in detail  with textual reference?
Q2- in pope work The rape of the lock the social life of the time is reflected as in a mirror give your comments
      Or
Would you redard belinda as a goddess as a pretty spoiled girl or as a flirt. Discuss?
Q3- The rape of the lock is a critism of lifeElucidate.
Q4-Do you believe that Alenxander pope is unparallel a satirist in English poetry ? Elaborate?

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


Sunday 22 September 2019

Difference Between Signifier and Signified

Difference Between Signifier and Signified

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


Key Difference – Signifier vs Signified
Signifier and signified are two words that are commonly used in semiotics. The Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure was one of the founders of semiotics. According to Saussure theory of signs, signifier and signified make up of signs. A sign is composed of both a material form and a mental concept. The signifier is the material form, i.e., something that can be heard, seen, smelled, touched or tasted, whereas the signified is the mental concept associated with it. This the key difference between signifier and signified.
What is a Signifier?
All signs have a signifier and signified. The signifier is the material form of the sign. This is the element that we can see, hear, taste, touch or smell. In other words, this is the physical form of the sign. For example, think of a red flag that is used to indicate danger. The red flag itself can be described as a signifier.
Although we always associate the term sign with road signs or warning signs, in semiotics, signs can refer to something that can be interpreted as having a meaning, which is something other than itself. Therefore, any unit of language can be also considered as signs since they are used to designate objects or phenomena of reality. The words we speak and write can be called signifiers since they are the material form of sign. However, a signifier cannot exist without a signified. For example, if the signs below have no signified concepts associated with them, there is no use in these signs; they would be just meaningless images.
AS SHOWN IN PICTURE – AA1
=============================
What is a Signified?
Signified is the mental concept associated with a sign. In other words, it is the concept, meaning or the thing associated with the signified. If we look at a linguistic example, the word “Closed” (in reference to the open and close signs displayed at a shop), the sign consists of,
Signifier: the word “Closed”
Signified Concept: The shop is closed for business.
AS SHOWN IN PICTURE NO- BB1
SUCH AS : FLOWER IS SIGNIFIER AND THE PICTURE OF FLOWER IS SIGNIFIED.
What is the Relationship Between Signifier and Signified?
A sign must always have both a signifier and a signified. Saussure named the relationship between signifier and signified as ‘signification‘. However, it is also important to notice that the same signifier can be used for different concepts. This is because the relationship between the signifier and the signified is sometimes arbitrary. For example, the word (signifier) pain has the meaning hurt, agony or discomfort, but in French, it refers to a loaf of bread. Signs can be classified into three groups based on this relationship between the signifier and the signified.
Types of Signs
Iconic Signs
The signifier and the signified bear a strong physical resemblance, i.e., signifier resembles what it stands for. For example, a picture of a tree stands for the concept of the tree.
Indexical Signs
The signifier has some relation to the signifier. It is in some way directly connected to the concept. For example, an image of smoke may represent a fire.
Symbolic Signs
There is no inherent relationship between the signifier and the signified. This connection is culturally learned. For example, the fact that the sign of the cross is related to Christianity is culturally learned since the two concepts have no intrinsic relation.
AS SHOWN IN PICTURE ….. CC1
Summary – Signifier vs Signified
Signs are made up of both signifier and signified. Signified is the sign’s physical or material form whereas signified is the meaning conveyed by the sign. However, the relationship between a signifier and signified is arbitrary since various signifiers can be used to indicate the same signified concept.

Wednesday 18 September 2019

TO_THE_LIGHTHOUSE - Virginia Woolf#Critical_Analysis_of_MINOR_CHARACTERS

#TO_THE_LIGHTHOUSE - Virginia Woolf
#Critical_Analysis_of_MINOR_CHARACTERS
◼➖⏏➖◼➖⏏➖◼➖⏏➖◼➖⏏➖◼➖⏏➖◼➖⏏➖◼
1. #WILLIAM_BANKES
--------------------------------------

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


#Introductory_Remarks
We are rather a bit dramatically introduced to William Bankes in the fourth chapter of the first part of the novel. Lily is painting and she does not want to find her pictures looked at by any body. Of course Bankes is an exception. Someone is coming towards her and from the sound of the footsteps she knows it is Bankes. He comes and stands beside her.
Mr. Bankes is a boyhood friend of Mr. Ramsay and is one of their guests at their summer house in the Island of Skye. But instead of staying with them at their summer house he has taken his lodgings in the town. He is a botanist, a devoted scientist. He is a widower. He is very scrupulous and clean and smells of soap. He is old enough to be Lily’s father.
#Lily_and_Bankes
Lily had very little feminine charm or glamour but it was Bankes who really appreciated her ordering habits, her good sense and other commendable qualities. So in his eyes Lily seemed much superior to Minta Doyle with all her class and allurement. They have many things in common. They understand each other quite well. They are accustomed to take strolls together, but they never talk about the common things of the work-a day world. They would rather talk about summer flowers and beautiful sights and sounds of nature and he would like to talk to her about perspective, about architecture. For his great qualities of head and heart Lily has highest respect and admiration for Mr. Bankes and his friendship is one of the greatest pleasures of her life. Indeed she loves him. But she likes to remain independent as an artist to devote herself completely to her creative activities. She also does not want her lofty feelings of love and admiration to degenerate into ordinary sex-relationship. Hence she renounces the pains and pleasures of a married life. And it is Lily’s sincere and silent eulogy that throws a flood of light on Mr. Bankes’ mind and character. This is how her intense feelings have been recorded:
“I respect you (she addressed him silently) in every atom; you are not vain; you are entirely personal; you are finer than Mr. Ramsay; you are the finest human being that I know…..generous, pure-hearted, heroic man.”
But while offering his silent eulogy Lily also remembers some of the eccentricities of this noble person. He has brought a valet all the way up to that distant place. He does not like dogs to jump and sit on the chair. And he would like to talk for hours about salt in vegetables and the iniquity of English cooks.
#Mr_Bankes_and_Mrs_Ramsay
Although Mrs. Ramsay often feels bored to listen to Mr. Bankes’ dull talks about vegetables and English cooks, yet her sympatheic heart has a soft corner for this childless unhappy widower. She pities him and has specially invited him to dinner. But to Lily he comes to be the least pitiable. And out of sympathy and pity for this poor scientist Mrs. Ramsay strongly feels that Mr. Bankes must marry Lily as they have so many things in common. She must do something to bring them together. She considers him to be the kindest of men and with Mr. Ramsay she also takes him to be the first scientist of his time. Surprisingly this old boyhood friend of Mr. Ramsay has also some soft corner, some sort of sublime Platonic love for Mrs. Ramsay.
“For him to gaze as Lily saw him gazing at Ramsay was a rapture, equivalent Lily felt, to the loves of dozens of young man.”
To Lily it is love distilled and filtered, love that never attempts to clutch its object.
#Mr_Bankes_and_Mr_Ramsay—#Contrast
The great thing about Mr. Bankes is that unlike Mr. Ramsay he never holds a very high opinion about himself nor does he care if his work and achievements are going to last long or not. He is never worried about the future, as he knows that changes of taste in literature is but natural. And then Mr. Bankes never requires any undue sympathy or assurance from anybody in this world. Lily’s long interior monoloque in the third Chapter of the first part enables us to enter into the inner life of these two characters so that we may have a clear picture of the two different personalities.
“You have greatness, she continued, but Mr. Ramsay has none of it. He is petty, selfish, vain, egotistical, he is spoilt, he is a tyrant, he wears Mrs. Ramsay to death; but he has what you (she addressed Mr. Bankes) have not; a fiery unworldliness; he knows nothing about trifles, he loves dogs and his children. He has eight, you have none.”
#Conclusion
Mr. Bankes does very little in this novel, but still his part is not a very insignificant one. From his talks and discussions with Lily we are able to know a lot about the personality of the Ramsays, especially that of Mr. Ramsay, when he tells Lily, how their boyhood friendship ceased on a stretch of road in Westmoreland and what a great change came on him after his marriage, we have Mr. Ramsay seen clearly through the eyes of William Bankes. In fact we may say that Mr. Bankes combined with Lily forms a kind of Greek chorus to comment on the personality of the Ramsays.
2. #AUGUSTUS_CARMICHAEL
---------------------------------------------------
#Introduction
We meet Mr. Augustus Carmichael the poet in the very first chapter of the book. He is basking in the sun with his yellow cat’s eyes ajar on the tennis lawn. And Mr. Ramsay stops by his side on her way to the town to ask him if he needs anything. With supreme indifference he murmurs his answer in the negative. Whatever may be the reason he shrinks from such sympathetic overtures from friends.
#An_Unhappy_Old_Man
We know something about the sadness of his life when Mr. Ramsay speaks about him to Charles Tansley who is accompanying her to the fishing village. Mr. Carmichael had an affair with a girl at Oxford. Their early marriage was a failure. Due to poverty he had to go India where he earned his livelihood by translating a little poetry and teaching the boys Persian or Hindustani. In fact his wife had ruined his life; he dropped things on his coats, he had the tiresomeness of an old man with nothing in the world to do and she turned him out of the room. So he is now addicted to opium. According to the children his beard is stained yellow with it. Mrs. Ramsay has infinite pity for him. With her sympathetic soul she can quite understand that this unhappy man comes to them every year for an escape.
#Disinterested_but_Dignified
He has very little interest in worldly affairs and worldly attachments after his tragic experience regarding his own family life. Mrs. Ramsay tried her best to make his life comfortable and often goes out of the way to be friendly to him. Still he is indifferent. He shrinks from her, thereby hurting her feelings. Not only this, his indifference to her friendly overtures often makes her aware of the pettiness of some part of her, and of human relations. In spite of his being hurt he has some soft corner for young Andrew. He is more or less devoted to him. And when he dies in the battle-field he has been terribly upset for days together.
Although he had to face so many rude shocks and knocks of life, yet he seems to be always content and dignified. In the dinner party he maintains his dignity nicely. At the fag end of the party he asks for another plate of soup without caring for what others might feel. In fact it upsets Mr. Ramsay very much. But Mr. Carmichael is unaffected. Mrs. Ramsay cannot but hold him in high esteem for his composure and dignity.
#Successful_as_a_Poet
Mr. Carmichael brought out a volume of poems in a spring during the dark years of the First World War. It had an unexpected success and brought him name and fame. Lily had never read a line of his poetry. But still she seems to know how it went, though slowly and sonorously.
“It was seasoned and mellow. It was about the desert and camel. It was about the palm tree and the sunset. It was extremely impersonal.”
Even Mr. Ramsay has great regard for him as a poet. To him he was really a true poet People would say that his poetry was beautiful. But his growing fame brings very little change in his manner and temperament.
#Conclusion
In the novel Mr. Carmichael is very little involved with his remoteness and aloofness. Still his function in the novel is of considerable importance. He is a poet and an artistic figure and so forms a parallel to Lily Briscoe. In the first chapter we find this remote and indifferent man often lying all day long on the lawn brooding presumably over his poetry. But still in the dinner scene his demand for another plate of soup and its reaction on Mr. and Mrs. Ramsay enables us to understand their typical difference of temperament and outlook on life. And till the end of the book he plays his silent and benign role quite impressively. Till the end Lily feels he understands her and can solve all her problems even if she may not express her difficulties verbally to him.
To Lily till the end
“he was an inscrutable old man, with the yellow stain on his, beard, and his poetry, and his puzzles, sailing serenely through a world which satisfied all his wants, so that she thought he had only to put down his hand where he lay on the lawn to up anything he wanted.”
And in the final scene of the novel we find this inscrutable figure standing by the side of Lily on the edge of the same lawn like an old pagan God just after the Ramsays have reached their destination and just before Lily makes her final stroke on her canvas and has had her final vision.
3. #CHARLES_TANSLEY
----------------------------------------
#Introduction
We are introduced to Charles Tansley, this typically irritating and self centred pedant, in the very first chapter of the novel. Mr. Ramsay has already shattered the hopes of James by telling him that the weather won’t be favourable enough to enable them to make a trip to the Lighthouse the next day. And then comes this pedant disciple of Mr. Ramsay to crush all their zeal by telling them bluntly, rather idiotically, that the wind is blowing from the worst possible direction to make it impossible for them to land at the Lighthouse. Mrs. Ramsay knows that he is in the habit of saying disagreeable things. But still she bitterly feels that ‘it was odious of him to rub this in, and make James still more disappointed.’ And the children—they all mocked him. They called him “The little atheist’. To them he was miserable specimen, all humps and hollows,
“he could not play cricket, he poked; he shuffled. He was a sarcastic brute,”
Andrew said. So with her great skill in characterisation Virginia Woolf has clearly revealed the main traits of this minor but important character in the very first chapter of this novel.
#Mr_Ramsay_and_Tansley: #A_Contrast
We know that Mr. Ramsay never refrains from telling unpleasant truths. But that is because he is incapable of untruth; he is unable to alter a disagreeable word to suit the pleasure and convenience of any person, least of all his own children whom he wants to face the stern facts of life boldly and squarely. But Tansley is a confirmed egoist and suffers from perversity of temperament so much so that his power to assert himself and irritate and disappoint others can reach the point of destruction.
“When they talked about something interesting then what they complained of about Charles Tansley was that until he had turned the whole thing round and made it somehow reflect himself and disparage them, put them all on edge somehow with his said way peeling the flesh and blood off everything, he was not satisfied.”
Some stern traits in Mr. Ramsay’s character may make him dislikable to some extent even to his children. But he has outstanding moral and intellectual qualities to make him lovable and respectable. But Tansley with his factlessness, egoism and perverse temperament is totally an object of mockery and hatred. Unfortunately he often tries to parody Mr. Ramsay. In this way Tansley just forms a perfect foil to Mr. Ramsay. In some respects, he is a foil to Mrs. Ramsay too. Mrs. Ramsay with her sympathetic nature is ever ready to twist a fact to save others from disappointment. But Tansley will take pleasure in twisting things to satisfy his own ego.
#The_Dinner_Party_and_TansleyZ_Egoism
Some of the important traits of Tansley’s character is clearly revealed during the course of the dinner party. As an embodiment of egoism he keenly desires that all conversation is centred round him. While others talk about different things he thinks they are all talking rot .So long as he is unable to assert himself, everything seems to him silly, superficial, flimsy. As he feels most women look down upon him, he cannot but think:
“Women made civilization impossible with all their charm’, all their silliness.”
And when Lily tries to pull his leg his vanity is wounded. He behaves rudely with her. And when the same Lily gives him a chance to assert and impress himself he talks and talks purely about himself for long. The egoist relieves himself of his egotism. His talk now begin to bore others, but the poor fellow does not understand this. Observing him closely Mrs. Ramsay is correct in her understanding that Tansley wants to assert himself and so it will be always with him till he gets his professorship or married his wife.
#His_Miserable_Past_and_his_Perversity
It should be noted that Tansley’s perversity, his irritating egoism are very much due to his bitter struggle for existence and a miserable past. And when he gets the first chance of walking with a beautiful woman, Mrs. Ramsay and get some recognition and sympathy from her, he becomes emotional and tells her almost everything about his past life. We come to know that his father was a poor shopkeeper. He himself had paid his own way since he was thirteen. Often he could not have a great-coat in winter and he smoked the cheapest tobacco. And as a student he worked very hard—seven hours a day. So Mrs. Ramsay’s heart melts, although he seems to be an awful prig, an insufferable bore. She would see that her children do not mock at him.
#Conclusion
With Mrs. Ramsay we also feel inclined to sympathise with this poor young man when we realise that his is mainly a case of social maladjustment. With her generous and sympathetic heart Mrs. Ramsay understood his problems and so took him under her protection. The following monologue that we have from Mrs. Ramsay when she leaves her children’s room after the dinner party reveals almost all the dark as well as brighter shades of Tansley’s character.
“Yet he looked so desolate; yet she would feel relieved, when he went; yet she would see that he was better treated tomorrow: yet he was admirable with her husband; yet his manners, certainly wanted improving.”

Sunday 15 September 2019

#JAZZ - by Toni Morrison#Use_of_Symbolism#Symbolism_Imagery_and_Allegory

#JAZZ - by Toni Morrison
#Use_of_Symbolism
#Symbolism_Imagery_and_Allegory
⏏➖⏏➖⏏➖⏏➖⏏➖⏏➖⏏➖⏏➖⏏➖⏏

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


Morrison uses symbolism throughout the book to support central themes, reveal character, and develop ideas.
#Birds
Birds appear repeatedly and symbolically in Jazz.
The redwings appear when Wild is nearby, according to local lore, and Joe finds this be to correct when he tries to speak to Wild. The redwings are no one's pets or possessions and represent Wild's freedom. Few would choose to live as Wild does, but Henry asserts that, though she may be "crazy," she has her "reasons." Yet she is not completely detached from the community; brides put out food for her, and she thieves small items from people's homes. The image of the redwings comes to Joe's mind, too, when he shoots Dorcas. He expects the crowd of dancers to "scatter" like the flock does when he tracks Wild, and yet they remain tightly clustered around Dorcas, cutting Joe off from her.
The pet birds represent domestic contentment. Violet and Joe get pet birds when they move to Lenox Avenue, and, as their marriage slowly recovers from the affair, Joe decides that the house needs birds again. The birds are caged and unused to flight; the poor parrot especially seems content in its cage before Violet throws it out. "I love you," the parrot says day in and day out. When Violet gets rid of her birds, she is perhaps saying that love is too painful or love has abandoned her home, and yet she misses their role in daily domestic routines. Alternatively, the freeing of the birds from their cage could symbolize Joe and Violet's wish to be freed from their marriage. However, neither can handle the freedom in the way the birds, who have the power of flight despite being unaccustomed to it, can handle theirs. Only when Joe and Violet tacitly agree to be husband and wife again is there room for the pet birds in their cages, almost as if some constraint is necessary for long-term happiness.
The author refers to the young men in the City as "young roosters who stood without waiting for the chicks who were waiting—for them." The image of a young rooster in the book represents a man's pride in his appearance. It could also symbolize the virility, frivolity, and vanity of youth. The young men living in the City are more interested in their appearance than in their character. Acton is one of these roosters, a young man with panache whom Dorcas falls for, much to Joe's dismay.
#Food
You know what's sexy? Barbeque. And popcorn. And candy. No, we're not being freaky over here, we're teaching you about jazz-age innuendo.
No really: When you hear a food reference in an old jazz song, you better believe that it's talking about knockin' boots. Alice knows this, and Alice is about the prudiest prude we can imagine. Check it out:
Wondering at this totally silent night, she can go back to bed, but as soon as she turns the pillow to the smoother, cooler side a melody line she doesn't remember where from sings itself, loud and unsolicited, in her head. "When I was young and in my prime, I could get my barbeque any old time."
The last time we checked, anyone could get barbeque at any age… unless of course barbeque means male attention.
Don't believe us? We're not the only ones who are equating references to tasty treats with, um, other sorts of tasty treats. Check this out.
So when you hear a reference to food in Jazz  that sounds like it might maybe be about something other than just food, remember that Jazz is based on jazz music. And jazz music was all about food representing sexytimes.
#Clothing
Clothing has several symbolic uses in Jazz.
Clothing expresses desire and desirability. Joe's hat provides an example. He wears it with "a definite slant," jauntily, and it sells him with his female clients. The unattractive clothes Dorcas wears are Alice's attempt to hide Dorcas's desirable body, and Felice and Dorcas do their best to eliminate "the hard hand of warning" in Dorcas's clothing before going to the dance party. The very presence of the "roosters" who dress flashily to catch women's eyes causes Joe envy because the young men are desirable, while he, in his buttoned sweater, feels old and passé.
Clothing signals connections. Vera Louise's green-as-grass dress is an example. First it belongs to a wealthy young woman; her lover then keeps it for years in his small home, where it is put to use by their son, on the day they first meet, to cover Wild, Joe's mother. Later, when Joe seeks out Wild, he sees the dress in her hovel. Green often represents life, and the dress ties these characters together as family, even when they don't know it. Another example is Alice's repairs to Violet's clothes. At first Alice rejects and resents Violet's presence, but each day that they talk while Alice mends tears in Violet's clothes with stitches "invisible to the eye," they stitch their unlikely friendship together as well.
Clothing represents social rank. The clearest example is Golden Gray's elegant wardrobe, which he carts to Virginia just to show off to his father. Golden worries about getting his clothes muddy when he carries Wild; he changes into utterly inappropriate clothing, including "boots that had never walked country roads," before Henry arrives. Wild, who is naked each time she appears in the novel, holds the lowest social rank of any character. Ironically, Golden chooses to shed his finery and live in the woods with Wild. He must wriggle out of his fancy clothing to achieve the metamorphosis that allows him to stay with her.

Saturday 14 September 2019

World of Innocence in Songs of Innocence by Blake

World of Innocence in Songs of Innocence by Blake

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


William Blake is a visionary pre-romantic poet of English literature. He lived in the age of neo-classism but never followed any rules or restriction of that age to write. Rather from his personal belief and experience, he liberally composed many works. Songs of Innocence is such example where he actually tries to depict the world of innocence.
In Songs of Innocence there are 19 poems. To depict the world of innocence, the poet takes help of art, poetry and music. The tools he used are first of all his high imagination and then imagery and symbol and so on. About the use of symbol, it can be said that without it actually it is impossible to render his poems.
Blake’s attempt of depiction of the world of innocence is shown below taking some of his poems from Songs of Innocence into consideration.
The general theme of Songs of Innocence is the pure innocence of children and the heavenly, secure and gleeful pastoral world of sport and merry-making. Each and every poem of this volume has some elements that help the reader to build or realize the world of innocence.
The world of innocence begins in the poem Introduction when a child appears before the piper, the poet considers himself as piper, from cloud. The child requests the piper to play a song about a lamb, an innocent creature:
“On a cloud I saw a child
And he laughing said to me
Pipe a Song about a Lamb”
Hearing the song the child then requests again to write down them so that “every child may joy to hear”. If we take symbolic significance into consideration, here we may find an inner depiction of the world of innocence. The child appears from a cloud and requests for song about a lamb- science announces that cloud or rain is free from all kind of pollution- pure. Similarly the world of innocence is pure. In Blake’s poem it is conventionally accepted that Lamb represents an innocent angel or Christ. As the world of the child is pure, the consequence is a request for song for innocence. It is also important that the child, the inhabitant of the world of innocence, not only listened to the song but also thought about other- a virtue. That is they are virtuous. Then we find 18 poems as request product of the child that depict the world of innocence before the readers.
The Lamb is one of them. In it we see that a child is making a few queries to a little lamb such as –
“Little Lamb, who made thee?”
And in answer he himself is telling that God has mad it Who also introduces Himself as Lamb. The poem actually depicts the connection between an innocent creature and God in respect of their innocence, purity. The following verses reflect this
“He became a little child
I a child, and thou a lamb”
A small but pregnant poem is Nurse’s Song, with several pictures. We find, in it, that some children are in play and a nurse prevails over there. She invokes them to stop playing and return home as the day is going to be end
“Then come home, my children, the sun is gone down”
Critics have found some inner meanings here. To them, the nurse here plays the role of a guardian angel. As the children are unconscious of the coming danger for their innocence and unpolluted mind, the nurse is here to guard them. The poet here actually tries to depict that the world of innocence is protected. As long as we belong to this world, that is its virtues, we are protected by God. Then another notable thing is that the children protest the exhortation and they are allowed to play some more time. These indicate that freedom is free in the world of innocence and is not suppressed by the authority.
An ornament for Songs of Innocence that has much contribution to depict the world of innocence is Holy Thursday. In this poem it is seen that some children are going to a church to attend a religious function. They raise their voice and hand toward God to say their prayers and this creates something:
“Now like a mighty wind they raise to Heaven the voice of Song
Or like harmonious thundering”
In it the children are considered as “flower of London town” and at last it has been said not to drive them away from door as they represent angels.
The meaning is that the dwellers of innocent world are like flower which is often offered to God to worship and for their innocence, whatever they say or ask reaches to God directly unlike the experienced men.
To depict an unseen element of the world of innocence, the poet had to come to his contemporary society. It is in The Chimney Sweeper that is apparently of pathos but inwardly of optimism.
A little chimney sweeper, Tom Dacre, is frustrated and expresses his sorrow of miserable life. Another sweeper consoles him. That night Tom saw a dream where he was set free from “coffins of black” symbolizing miserable life, by an angel who gave him advice to work properly to have “God for his father”. And in last line it has been said:
“So if all do their duty they need not harm”
The depiction is that the inhabitants of the world of innocence sometimes may be subject to worse situation but they should not be irresponsible and pessimist. Rather they should be hopeful. They should believe that God sees everything and so for their good deeds, they will be awarded at last. The world of innocence is of optimism.
Actually what Blake depicts in Songs of Innocence about the world of innocence is associated with heaven. The dwellers of this world are in connection with God for having His divine qualities among them. The mention that we find in Songs of Innocence of nature is also vivid and makes us clear that there is nothing artificial. Everything is natural. Even the elements that the poet has used to write down these songs are natural:
“And I made a rural pen,
And I stained the water clear,
And I wrote my happy songs” (Introduction)
Thus, by the help of symbolism, imagery, sometimes irony, and his rich imagination, Blake has nicely depicted the world of innocence in Songs of Innocence that is very much suitable for the innocent to practice their divine qualities.

Thursday 12 September 2019

Thackeray's Vanity Fair -- A Novel Without Hero !ٹھاکرے کا وینٹی میلہ - ہیرو کے بغیر ایک ناول!

Thackeray's Vanity Fair -- A  Novel Without Hero !

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


ٹھاکرے کا وینٹی میلہ - ہیرو کے بغیر ایک ناول!
ٹھاکرے نے ایک نیک خواب کی طاقت کے ساتھ ناول کی حیثیت سے روایتی روایت کے خلاف بغاوت کی ، ایک نیک طاقتور ہیرو اور نیک نثر اور خوبصورت ہیروئین اور شیطان کے مخالف ہیرو کی ایک لشکر اور آخر کار ان سب کو ایک دوسرے پر قابو پالیا۔ انہوں نے "وینٹی فئیر" کو بطور تجرباتی ناول لکھا جس میں زندگی کی حقیقت پسندی کی عکاسی کی گئی ہے۔ درحقیقت ، ناول میں کوئی مرد کردار نہیں ہے جو واقعی اپنے لئے عنوان ہیرو کا دعویٰ کر سکے۔ اس ناول میں جارج وسبورن ، ڈوبن اور راڈون کرولی کے تین کردار ہیں ، جو نمایاں طور پر ناول میں نمایاں ہیں ، لیکن ان سب میں نامکمل شخصیات ہیں اور اس وجہ سے وہ قاری کو متاثر کرنے میں ناکام ہیں۔ وہ وینٹی میلے کے لئے موجود ہیں لیکن وینٹی میلہ ان کے لئے موجود نہیں ہے۔
وسبورن نے اس کے بارے میں کوئی غیر معمولی چیز نہیں ہے۔ وہ صرف ایک فیشنی بانکا ہے ، جو چیزوں کی ظاہری چمک سے ہمیشہ راغب ہوتا ہے جب وہ ریمارکا اپنے تبصرے کو بالکل درست انداز میں بیان کرتی ہے جب وہ ریمارکس دیتی ہے "... وہ خود غرض ہمبگ ، وہ کم نسل والا کاکنی بانکا ، اس گدی والا بوبی ، جس کے پاس نہ تو کوئی عقل تھی۔ نہ ہی آداب اور نہ ہی دل۔ " ڈوبن جارج وسبورن سے ایک نیک آدمی اور بہت مضبوط شخصیت ہے۔ وہ امیلیا کے خاموش عاشق کی حیثیت سے آتا ہے اور اس ناول کے اختتام پر اپنی محبت کے بارے میں کبھی منہ نہیں کھاتا۔ ٹائیڈن کریلے ابتدا میں ہی قارئین کو متاثر کرتا ہے جب وہ ربیکا سے شادی کا جرات مندانہ قدم اٹھاتا ہے لیکن جیسے جیسے یہ ناول آگے بڑھتا ہے ، وہ تنزلی کا شکار ہوتا ہے صرف ایک پرجیوی میں.
وینٹی میلہ "ہیرو کے بغیر ایک ناول" ہے لیکن اس میں ایک ہیروئن ہے اور وہ انگریزی افسانے کی اعلیٰ تخلیقوں میں سے ایک ہے۔ بکی شارپ بلا شبہ اس ناول کی ہیروئن کہلا سکتی ہے۔ . وہ اس معنی میں ناول کی ہیروئین ہے جس میں شیطان جنت گم ہو جانے کا ہیٹو ہے۔ بیکی شارپ نہ صرف اپنے آپ میں ایک شاندار تخلیق ہے ، باقی کتاب سے اس کا رشتہ شاندار کاریگری کا ایک کارنامہ ہے۔ انسانی فطرت کی اہم خصوصیات اور معاشرتی ڈھانچے پر ان کے اثر و رسوخ ، اور انفرادی یادداشت پر اس اثر و رسوخ کی عکاسی۔ خواتین ، یہ کتاب کا زمینی کام ہے۔ اس کے مرکز میں ، بیکی شارپ کی چھوٹی سی شخصیت اعداد و شمار کے طور پر کام کرتی ہے۔ کہانی سب سے متنوع راستوں کو جوڑتی ہے: فوج کی زندگی ، شہر کے تاجر؟ معاشرے ، ملک میں نرم مزاج کی زندگی ، نسل غربت ، فیشن معاشرہ ، ان تمام تناؤ کے ساتھ بیکی کی کہانی یا تو ایک لمس سے منسلک ہے یا قریبی دخل اندازی کے ساتھ ، اور "یہ اس کا کردار ہے جو ان طفیلیوں کو پائے جانے والے ان اثرات کو انتہائی اونچی شکل میں ظاہر کرتا ہے۔ فیشن کے خواہشمندوں سے ، معاشرتی زندگی کے ہر شعبے کو اجازت دی ، گٹر ہاؤس میں داخل ہونے والے گٹر میں کھیلنے والے بچوں کے لئے جدوجہد کرتے ہوئے ، جو ایک پیسہ ملا ہے اس بچے کو عدالت ادا کرنے کے لئے دوڑتا ہے۔
ربکا اس ناول کی مرکزی شخصیت ہے اور اسے قاری کے تخیل پر غیر معمولی گرفت حاصل ہے۔ یہ اس لئے ہے کہ ان میں ان خصوصیات میں سے کوئی بھی نہیں ہے جو عام طور پر عورت کو دلچسپ بناتی ہے۔ وہ جھوٹی ، منافق ، ناشکری اور مطلب ہے۔ کوئی ایسی ہیروئن نہیں ہے جس کے سحر کو ہم پوری طرح سے اور بمشکل ہی سمجھ سکتے ہیں جسے قاری اتنی صاف ستھری طرح دیکھ سکتا ہے۔ وہ بدعنوان ہے لیکن پھر بھی وہ اپنی بے باک ہمت اور زندگی کا سامنا کرنے کی صلاحیت کی وجہ سے ہماری ہمدردیاں برداشت کرتی ہے۔
Thackeray rebelled against the established tradition  of treating novel as a dream land with a virtuous all -powerful hero and virtuous all-pretty heroine and a legion of devil's opposing hero and the latter ultimately  overpowering all of them one by one. He wrote " Vanity Fair" as an experimental novel  depicting the actuality of life as it really is. Indeed , there is no male character in the novel who can  really claim for himself  the title hero. There are three characters , namely George Osborne , Dobbin and Rawdon Crawley who figure prominently in the novel , but they all have incomplete personalities and hence fail to impress  the reader. They exist for Vanity Fair but Vanity Fair does not exist for them
Osborne has nothing extraordinary about him. He is just a fashionable dandy, who is always attracted by the outward glow of things Rebecca sums up his character very accurately when she remarks "...that selfish humbug , that low-bred cockney dandy, that padded booby, who had neither wit nor manners  nor heart." Dobbin is a virtuous man and a far stronger personality than George Osborne. He comes as a silent lover of Amelia and never opens his mouth regarding his love toll the very end of the novel.Taedan Craeley does impress the readers in the beginning when he takes the bold step  of marrying Rebecca but as the novel proceeds, he degrnerates into a mere parasite.
Vanity Fair is " a novel without hero "  but it does have a heroine and she is one of the supreme creations of English fiction.Becky Sharp can undpubtedly be called the heroine of the novel. . She is heroine of the novel in the sense in which Satan is the heto of Paradise Lost. Not only is Becky Sharp a brilliant creation in herself, her relationship  to the rest of the book is a feat of brilliant craftsmanship.The leading characteristics of human nature and their influence on the social structure, and the reflection of this influence on individual mem and women, this is the ground work of the book. At  its centre, the scintillating figure of Becky Sharp acts as precipitator.The story combines the most  diverse strands : of army life ,city merchants ? Society, country gentlefolk's life, genteel poverty , fashionable society , with all these strands Becky's story is connected either by a touch or with close interweaving , and" It is her character which shows in the most heightened form  those influences  which the satirist discovers to have permrated all walks of social life-from the aspirants of fashion, struggling for entry to Gaunt House to the children playing in the gutter who run to pay court to the child who has got a penny.
Rebecca is the central figure in the novel and has an extraordinary hold over the reader's imagination.This is so because she has none of those qualities which usually make a woman interesting. She is a liar , a hypocrite, ungrateful and mean. There is no heroine whose charms we can understand completely and scarcely any other whom the reader can see  so plainly. She is corrupt but still she carries  our sympathies on account of her dauntless courage and capacity to face life.

Evaluate Tennyson,Browning and Mathew Arnold as the representative poets of the Victorian age

Evaluate Tennyson,Browning and Mathew Arnold as the representative poets of the Victorian age
Tennyson was the most popular as well as the representative poet of the Victorian age. From his early age he displayed a talent for poetry and afterwards he choose poetry as his vocation. His genius lay in his Lyrics, the dramatic monologue and the classical poems. Tenyson’s most ambitious work for which he was most acclaimed in his own age was the Idylls of the King, a series of poems on King Arthur. These Arthurian poems were picturesque at the same time romantic, allegorical and didactic . He reduced the plan of the Arthurian stories to the necessities of Victorian morality. His another remarkable work is In Memoriam. In this poem he dives deeper into the mystery of the human mind. Here he records the death of his friend Arthur Hallam and his thoughts and the problems of life and death, his religious anxieties, and his hard-won faith in eternal life.
He also wrote poetry by using Greek legends. In his such classical poems as Ththonus, Ulysses, and The Lotos Eaters he re-interpreted the Greek legends in a modern way. He made poetry the description of a beautiful and antique old world. His other notable poems are ‘Maut’ The Palace of Art’ ‘The dream of fair Women’, Oenone and The Princess. In the princess he touches upon the theme of the legitimate position and function of women in the Victorian society.
Tennyson, it has been pointed out, was the representative poet of his age. He represented its ideals, its aspirations, its social attitude and its moral perplexities. He chooses ideas that reflected the strength and the weakness of the Victorian age. He was also the supreme craftsman of the structure of verse among the Victorian poets.

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW



Robert Browning
Robert Browning was one of the representative poets of the Victorian Age. Browning started his poetic career quite early, but it was his dramatic elopement with Elizabeth Barrett, the young poetess, at the age of thirty three that brought about new an glorious chapter in his poetic life. For the next fifteen years, the couple lived in Italy, where so much of Browning’s best poetry was inspired and composed.
Browning is most remembered for his dramatic monologues in which he makes psychological studies of several characters. He was interested in the fortunes of a single mind, and for this purpose he evolved the ‘dramatic monologue’. And it was in this form that many of his best-known pieces were composed such as ’ Andrea del Sarto, ‘Fra Lippo Lippi’ ‘Soul’ , and ‘The Bishop orders his Tom’. Their appearances in a series of volumes, which included Dramatic Lyrics, Men and Women, and Dramatic Personae gave him in the later half of the century a reputation second only to that of Tennyson. They remain his outstanding achievement. He put his method to the greatest test in The Ring and the Book in which a series of dramatic monologues are woven to make one of the longest poems in the English language.
In his poetry Browning depicts the Italian Renaissance. Browning had selected a sordid Italian life of crime. His poems are crowded with memorable characters, and the whole of Renaissance Italy comes to life in his pages. At first he seems to have created a world of living people as Shakespeare had done, but a closer inspection shows that Browning’s Men and Women are not free. They live in a spiritually totalitarian state in which browning is chancellor and God is president, always with the proviso that the chancellor is the President’s voice on earth.
He had developed also an independence of style, with an assumption of unusual rhythms, grotesque rhymes, and abrupt, broken phrasing. At its best this gave to his verses a virility which contrasts pleasantly with the over-melodious movement of much nineteenth-century poetry. That he was a master of verse can be seen from the easy movement of his Lyrics, but his special effects, though they gave realism to his poems, were in danger, in his later works, of becoming a mannerism.
Thus, for his beautiful dramatic monologues, the psychological study of the characters, the depiction of Renaissance Italy and the Philosophical quality of his poetry Browning has remained one of the frequently cited poets of English literature.
Matthew Arnold
Mathew Arnold was also an intellectual Victorian poet and his poetry expressed more keenly the intellect of the Victorian World. His place, as a poet is honorable and dignified in the ranks of those, who are just below the best. But as a prose master, Arnold has a more secured position in the literary world of England. His remarkable prose works are On Translating Homer, Essays in Criticism, and Culture and Anarchy.
As a scholar, Arnold remains basically a formidable force for the intellectual and cultural revival of his race. All this end. He has insisted, in all of them, on the strength of the classical spirit to rehabilitate the intellectual and cultural outlook of English literature.
Arnold is essentially a critic, though originally a poet, and his poetry and his criticism go hand in hand, As a critic-poet, he has emphasised the necessity of design in poetry and also the grand style. Arnold’s exposition of the ‘grand style’ is found in his lectures On Translating Homer. In his Essays of criticism, he insists on the interpretative power of poetry. He calls poetry a criticism of life, under the conditions fixed for such a criticism by the laws of poetic truth and poetic beauty.
His prose has the full measure of regularity, uniformity, precision and balance, In facts, the outstanding quality of Arnold’s prose style is its lucidity, its precision and its clarity. His meaning is never missed and his correctness is unquestionable.

Hamlet by Shakespeare :

Hamlet by Shakespeare :\

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


Summary :
Prince Hamlet is depressed. Having been summoned home to Denmark from school in Germany to attend his father's funeral, he is shocked to find his mother Gertrude already remarried. The Queen has wed Hamlet's Uncle Claudius, the dead king's brother. To Hamlet, the marriage is "foul incest." Worse still, Claudius has had himself crowned King despite the fact that Hamlet was his father's heir to the throne. Hamlet suspects foul play.
When his father's ghost visits the castle, Hamlet's suspicions are confirmed. The Ghost complains that he is unable to rest in peace because he was murdered. Claudius, says the Ghost, poured poison in King Hamlet's ear while the old king napped. Unable to confess and find salvation, King Hamlet is now consigned, for a time, to spend his days in Purgatory and walk the earth by night. He entreats Hamlet to avenge his death, but to spare Gertrude, to let Heaven decide her fate.
Hamlet vows to affect madness — puts "an antic disposition on" — to wear a mask that will enable him to observe the interactions in the castle, but finds himself more confused than ever. In his persistent confusion, he questions the Ghost's trustworthiness. What if the Ghost is not a true spirit, but rather an agent of the devil sent to tempt him? What if killing Claudius results in Hamlet's having to relive his memories for all eternity? Hamlet agonizes over what he perceives as his cowardice because he cannot stop himself from thinking. Words immobilize Hamlet, but the world he lives in prizes action.
In order to test the Ghost's sincerity, Hamlet enlists the help of a troupe of players who perform a play called The Murder of Gonzago to which Hamlet has added scenes that recreate the murder the Ghost described. Hamlet calls the revised play The Mousetrap, and the ploy proves a success. As Hamlet had hoped, Claudius' reaction to the staged murder reveals the King to be conscience-stricken. Claudius leaves the room because he cannot breathe, and his vision is dimmed for want of light. Convinced now that Claudius is a villain, Hamlet resolves to kill him. But, as Hamlet observes, "conscience doth make cowards of us all."
In his continued reluctance to dispatch Claudius, Hamlet actually causes six ancillary deaths. The first death belongs to Polonius, whom Hamlet stabs through a wallhanging as the old man spies on Hamlet and Gertrude in the Queen's private chamber. Claudius punishes Hamlet for Polonius' death by exiling him to England. He has brought Hamlet's school chums Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to Denmark from Germany to spy on his nephew, and now he instructs them to deliver Hamlet into the English king's hands for execution. Hamlet discovers the plot and arranges for the hanging of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern instead. Ophelia, distraught over her father's death and Hamlet's behavior, drowns while singing sad love songs bemoaning the fate of a spurned lover. Her brother, Laertes, falls next.
Laertes, returned to Denmark from France to avenge his father's death, witnesses Ophelia's descent into madness. After her funeral, where he and Hamlet come to blows over which of them loved Ophelia best, Laertes vows to punish Hamlet for her death as well.
Unencumbered by words, Laertes plots with Claudius to kill Hamlet. In the midst of the sword fight, however, Laertes drops his poisoned sword. Hamlet retrieves the sword and cuts Laertes. The lethal poison kills Laertes. Before he dies, Laertes tells Hamlet that because Hamlet has already been cut with the same sword, he too will shortly die. Horatio diverts Hamlet's attention from Laertes for a moment by pointing out that "The Queen falls."
Gertrude, believing that Hamlet's hitting Laertes means her son is winning the fencing match, has drunk a toast to her son from the poisoned cup Claudius had intended for Hamlet. The Queen dies.
As Laertes lies dying, he confesses to Hamlet his part in the plot and explains that Gertrude's death lies on Claudius' head. Finally enraged, Hamlet stabs Claudius with the poisoned sword and then pours the last of the poisoned wine down the King's throat. Before he dies, Hamlet declares that the throne should now pass to Prince Fortinbras of Norway, and he implores his true friend Horatio to accurately explain the events that have led to the bloodbath at Elsinore. With his last breath, he releases himself from the prison of his words: "The rest is silence."
The play ends as Prince Fortinbras, in his first act as King of Denmark, orders a funeral with full military honors for slain Prince Hamlet.

DOCTOR_FAUSTUS - Christopher Marlowe#The_over_reacher”—#Is_that_an_apt_description_of_MarloweZ_heroes?#Discuss_with_reference_to_Doctor_Faustus

DOCTOR FAUSTUS - Christopher Marlowe
The_over_reacher”—
#Is_that_an_apt_description_of_MarloweZ_heroes?
#Discuss_with_reference_to_Doctor_Faustus. (PU)

➖➖➖

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


                                                  YOU TUBE CHANNEL

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
#Faustus_the_protagonist_who_falls_through_his_own_will:
Faustus is the central figure of Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus. Faustus is a character ideal to be the hero of a tragedy where man alone is the maker of his fate, good or bad. He falls, not by the fickleness of fortune or the decree of fate, or because he has been corrupted by Mephistophilis, the agent of Lucifer, the Devil, but because of his own will.
#Faustus: #no_king_or_prince_but_a_Great_Scholar:
Faustus is an ordinary German of parents base of stock’ who goes to Wittenberg for higher studies, mainly supported by his kinsmen. But in course of time, he graces the golden field of learning and before long obtains a Doctor’s in Divinity for his unsurpassed skill in dispute on heavenly problems. He has attained mastery over various branches of study. Thus Faustus is a break from the traditional concept of the tragic hero to the extent that he is not of royalty or any noble parentage. But he is great all the same, because of his scholarship.
#Faustus_is_a_man_of_extraordinary_calibre:
He possesses rich imaginative faculty. He cherishes the idea that as a magician he will be greater than emperors and kings, and his dominion will stretch “as far as doth the mind of man.” He will become a mighty God. Endowed with exceptional imaginative power, he visualizes as a magician the bright dreams of his future.
#Faustus_is_a_born_poet
Poetry is an innate gift with him. He makes blind Homer sing to him of the love of Paris and Oenone, and he makes Amphion produce ravishing music from his melodious harp. In the final soliloquy, Faustus calls upon the heavenly spheres to stop moving so that time ceases and midnight never comes. But the most wonderful among his passages is his apostrophe to Helen. His speech to Helen bespeaks of his high imaginative faculty and is pregnant with mythological allusions.
#Faustus_like_Icarus_running_too_high:
#Presumption_the_cause_of_his_tragedy
Faustus is not satisfied with his vast knowledge in various subjects of the university, for still he is an ordinary man. Faustus wants to be a superman; he wants to be a “mighty God.” He is “swollen with cunning and of a self-conceit”—to such an extent that he becomes the “Icarus” of classical mythology. And he aspires on the artificial wings of his knowledge to soar above human limits, to reach the status of a “Jove in the sky.” Pride is the sin for which the angels fell, and in consequence of it, heaven conspires the overthrow of Faustus.
#Faustus: #the_child_of_Renaissance
Faustus, with his yearning for knowledge, proceeds to study necromancy. He responds to the suggestions of the Evil Angel, to attain the position of a ‘Lord and Commander’ of the world. He tries his brain “to gain a deity” and he commits a sinful act. But he is not at all terrified of ‘damnation.’ He does not believe in pains after death. He sells his soul to Mephistophilis to acquire unlimited power to probe the secrets of the universe.
#Faustus_mental_conflict: #a_study_of_his_mind
Faustus’s choice of necromancy is made after inner conflict. The appearance of the Good Angel and the Bad Angel side by side are the personifications of his good and evil impulses. His conventional heart is opposed to his self-damnation and this is clearly hinted when his blood congeals as he proceeds to write: “Faustus delivers his soul to the Devil.” But he ignores these warnings and completes the scroll. But the conflict arises again in his mind—the conflict between his impulse to fly to God and his resolution to stick to the pledge made to the Devil. As the time rolls on, he becomes more and more disillusioned about the profits he expected from Magic, and the growing sense of loss and of the wages of ‘damnation’ begins to sting him like a scorpion:
When I behold the heaven, then I repent,
And curse thee, wicked Mephistophilis,
Because thou hast deprived me of those joys.
—(Act II, Scene II)
But it is he himself, and not Mephistophilis who is to blame.
#Faustus_the_complex_character_dominated_by_ambition
The more Faustus turns towards God, the greater becomes the force of the Devil to drag him back into his trap. Faustus is an inordinately ambitious hero. He denounces God, blasphemes the Trinity and Christian doctrines, and sells his soul to the Devil to gain superhuman power and to live a life of voluptuousness for twenty-four years. The death is cast in his very first monologue Faustus bids Divinity adieu. He turns a deaf ear to the earnest appeal of the Good Angel to lay that damned book aside, and is carried away by the allurements of the Evil Angel who tells him to be “on earth as Jove in the sky.” It is Faustus who utters such blasphemous words:
Had I as many souls as there be stars,
I’d give them all for Mephistophilis.
By him I’ll be great emperor of the world.
The uttering of the phrase “consummtumest” after signing the bond with his own blood is nothing but blasphemous irony. Discussing about hell and heaven with Mephistophilis, Faustus tells him that he is not worried by such “old wives’ tales” and damnation.
#Faustus: #moment_of_crisis_and_self_realization_comes_late_as_to_all_tragic_heroes
Faustus is isolated from his surroundings. He does not die suddenly. And before dying, Faustus reaches that point of horror, when even pride is abandoned. Faustus would like to retrace his steps and repent of his surrender to the Devil. But Lucifer, Belzebub and Mephistophilis appear and demand the fulfilment of the conditions to which Faustus had agreed by signing a bond with his blood. Finding no other way, Faustus begs the forgiveness of the devils and vows never to mention God or pray to Him or to look to Heaven. But Faustus’s conscience is not absolutely dead. On hearing the Old Man’s exhortation, Faustus immediately becomes aware or his predicament and says to himself:
Where art thou, Faustus? Wretch, What hast thou done?
Damned art thou, Faustus, damned; despair and die.
Faustus’s inner conflict reappears in a more acute and agonising form. He feels that hell is calling him with “a roaring voice.” Mephistophilis offers him a dagger so that he may kill himself and go to hell. Faustus is distressed. When the Old Man comes and tells him not to commit suicide and that he might yet receive the mercy of God, Faustus’s distressed soul is comforted. Faustus, therefore, tries to repent. But he is not allowed to repent by the devils.
#What_motivates_Faustus_towards_his_doom?
Faustus is unsurpassed in his magic idealisation of that which is essentially base and carnal. He seeks immortality in the kiss of Helen—a spirit.
Faustus is not one consumed with a thirst of knowledge, says Arnold Wynne, for we see him exercising his supernatural gifts in the most puerile and useless fashion. It is impossible, therefore, to regard his ambition as a lust for knowledge in the usual meaning of that term, differentiating it from sensual experience. If Faustus is to be liable according to his dominant trait, then let us describe him as embodiment of sensual-gratification.”
Marlowe’s Faustus, the legendary German scholar, is an insatiable speculator. His brilliant mind dismisses all subjects one by one. Magic ravishes him and nothing should daunt his determination to command all things that move between the quiet poles. Faustus aspires to unlawful knowledge because it is an instrument of power. It is the passion for omnipotence rather than omniscience that urges Faustus to summon Mephistophilis by incantation to his side. He puts some questions to Mephistophilis on astrology, Lucifer and hell, but the fruit of experience is disillusionment. The replies of Mephistophilis hardly satisfy him. Wagner’s narration of his aerial voyages for cosmography and Faustus’s discussion on geography with his attendant spirit—all this exemplifies the insatiable passion of Faustus for knowledge, but he seeks knowledge because knowledge is power. Faustus employs his magical power not only to acquire knowledge but also for his sensual-gratification. He is a sensualist from the moment he takes up the book of magic to ponder over what it may bring him.
#Faustus_not_fit_to_be_a_tragic_hero_according_to_some_critics
The element of sensuality is so much emphasised in the character of Faustus that some critics have gone to the extent of regarding him as an incarnation of lust and as such, unfitted to support tragedy. His creator, according to these critics, inspires him with his own Bohemian joy in mere pleasure, his own thirst for fresh sensations, his own vehement disregard of restraint—a disregard which brought Marlowe to a tragic and unworthy end. But, as if in mockery, he degrades him with unmanly, ignoble qualities that excite our derision. His mind is pleased with toys that would amuse a child; at the conclusion of an almost incredibly trivial show of the Seven Deadly Sins, he exclaims “O, how this sight doth delight my soul!” His practical jokes are unworthy of a court jester. The congealing of his blood agitates his superstitious mind far more than the terrible frankness of Mephistophilis. “Miserably mean-spirited, he seeks to propitiate the wrath of the fiend by invoking his torments upon an old man whose disinterested appeal momentarily quickened his conscience into revolt. Finally, when we recall the words with which Tamburlaine faced death, what contempt despite the frightful anguish of the scene is aroused by Faustus’s screams of terror at the approach of Lucifer to claim him as his own! In his vacillations we see, not the noble conflict of good and evil impulses but an ignoble tug-of-war between timidity and appetite” as Wynne observes.
Faustus, though proud as he is, lacks firm determination; he wavers and vacillates; “his character is in fact not one of fixed determination, as it is so often asserted; he constantly wavers, and his purposes change.” Sometimes he sounds immovable, but at other moments he is furiously torn by conflict.
#Tragedy_of_Faustus_is_symbolic
Faustus stands not for a character, not for a man, but for Man, for Everyman. The grim tragedy that befalls him is not a personal tragedy, but a tragedy that overtakes all those who dare “practice more than heavenly power permits.” The terrible conflict that goes on in his mind is not particular to him alone, but common to all who waver between opposites. In the character of Faustus “there are no details, no personal traits, no eccentricities or habits, nothing that is intimate or individual. Marlowe could not have told us where or in what way, Faustus differed from any other man. He was concerned only with the part of him which was common to all men, yet in virtue of which he exceeded all men, his mind. And that mind is Marlowe’s—the limitless desire, the unbridled passion for the infinite, a certain reckless, high confidence in the will and spirit of man.” The doubts and fears which rock the mind of Faustus are not of one character alone: these doubts and fears about hell, heaven, God, salvation and damnation have been experienced by all inquisitive men in all ages.
Faustus wavers between his Good and Evil angels, between God and Devil, so we may see Marlowe hesitating between the submissive acceptance of a dogmatic system and a pagan simplicity of outlook to which instinct and temperament prompted him. It will be hard to condemn Marlowe as an atheist. His sceptical and rebellious temperament was not simply his personal tendency; rather he was impressed by the prevailing tendency for free thinking on religious matters. In the same sense, Faustus, with all doubts and fears about hell and damnation, believes in Christ and God. Faustus in the beginning is a bold, defiant and adventurous spirit of the Renaissance but at the approach of his doom he reaffirms his faith in Christ and God. In the final hour, the fact of redemption to which Faustus has closed his eyes for so many years becomes apparent to him and he cries:
See, see; where Christ’s blood streams in the firmament,
One drop would save my soul, half a drop……
A person who believes in the blood of Christ as the ransom for all the sins of the human, or that turns to God after having once abjured him, cannot be regarded as an atheist. Faustus discovers that intellectual pride and insolence of man are responsible for dragging him away from God and true religion.
“Faustus’s passion for knowledge and power is in itself a virtue, but diverted from the service of God it threatens to become totally negative and self-destroying.” as O.P. Brockbent says.

Wednesday 11 September 2019

Past papers Joseph Andrews.. UOS 2016 TO 2018

Past papers Joseph Andrews.. UOS ANNUAL 2016 TO ANNUAL 2018 

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


2nd annual 2016 
Who is Betty?
Who is parson Barnabas?

Fielding started the JOSEPH ANDREWS as a parody of Richardson's prose writing Pamela but it became the pioneer of a new type of fiction in English literature which was afterwards called novel..Elaborate

Annual 2017
Who is Slipslop?
Who is Betty?
Fielding started with intention of parodying Richardson's Pamela and ends by writing a great novel. Elaborate

Annual 2018
Who is parson Adams?
Write an introduction of lady Booby..
The character of Joseph Andrews continuously develops through the course of the story..Discuss
" A declare here once for all that a describe not men but manners, not individuals but a species.How for this claim of Fielding justified with regards to Joseph Andrews..

2nd annual 2018
Where had Joseph Andrews been working and how long he worked there?
Who is Pamela and with whom she was married?
What are the characteristics that make Fielding's Joseph Andrews a comic epic in prose? Discuss in detail

2nd annual 2015
How is Joseph Andrews recognised at the end of the novel about his parentage?
Critically analyse the potential role of Joseph Andrews as hero of the novel in your own words



1.Fielding starts with an intention of parodying Richardson's Pamela and ends by writing a great novel? Elaborate. (2017)


2. Fielding starts the Joseph Andrews with the intension of writing a burlesque of Richardson's Pamela but as the work progressed it became the pioneer of a new type of novel .Elaborate. (2016)

3. " I declare here, once for all, I describe not men but manners, not individual but species". How far this claim is justified in the novel Joseph Andrews?
 Comment. (2014)

4. In "Joseph Andrew" Fielding presents Parson Adams as the most dominant character. Elaborate. (2013)
.


Novel Notes
                                       
​                    Joseph    Andrews
​Who is Lady Booby? UOS 2015-18
Lady Booby, the villainess of the story, is a middle-aged lectures and wife of Sir Thomas Booby. After the death of her husband she holds the control of Booby estate. She has lusty eye on the attractive, intelligent villager Joseph Andrews and makes him her footman.
​Who is Fanny? UOS 2015
Fanny Goodwill is a humble but beautiful dairy maid who is engaged to Joseph Andrews and loves him fiercely. She is an orphan who has been brought up on the Booby estate. In the recent past she was fired by Mrs. Slipslop.
​Who is Parson Adams and what is his role?  OR Who is Mr. Abraham Adams? UOS 2018
Parson Adams is a learned clergyman of Lady Booby’s parish estate. He has studied Latin and Greek. He has upright character and Christian charity. He serves himself as a picaresque companion for Joseph. He is a poor man and he is the firm pivot of the novel’s moral influence.
​Who is Parson Barnabas and what is his role? UOS 2014-16
Parson Barnabas is a high-Church Anglican clergyman. He takes pleasure is drinking punch. He disagrees with Parson Adams and believes Clergy people should not live in luxury
​Who is Betty? UOS 2016-17
She is a Chamber-maid in Tow-Wouse inn. She recommends of Joseph’s treatment and takes herself as Joseph’s nurse. She is also lustful and her association with him ends badly.
​Who is Squire Booby?
Squire Booby is the nephew of Sir Thomas and Lady Booby. He marries the servant Pamela Andrews. Squire Booby is a good man who frees Joseph from jail and accepts him as an equal. Because of class pride, however, he objects to Joseph's marriage to Fanny.
​Who is Mr. Wilson?
Mr. Wilson is a former rake and now a country squire whom Joseph Andrews meets on his journeys. Mr. Wilson offers Joseph Andrews, Parson Adams, and Fanny Goodwill hospitality.
Who is beau didapper? UOS 2016
Didapper is a rough, provoked by by Lady Booby to rape Fanny Goodwill so that Joseph’s marriage might be affected. Beau Didapper only has one role in Joseph Andrews: to cause mischief for Fanny and Joseph that will benefit Lady Booby
​Who were the real parents of Joseph?
Mr. and Mrs. Wilson were the real parents of Joseph
Who is Mrs. Slipslop?  UOS 2016-17-19
Slipslop is a foil and also a coarse echo of Lady Booby; she is vain and proud. She acts as she was one of the gentry, and she is sexually attracted to Joseph Andrews.
Who is Peter Pounce? 2019
Lady Booby's steward, a stingy, uncharitable man who on one occasion saves Fanny from rape but plans to enjoy her himself. He also loans oat money to the servants at exorbitant interest rates.
Who is Pamela Andrews?
Pamela Andrews is Joseph’s virtuous and beautiful sister, from whom he derives inspiration for his resistance to Lady Booby’s sexual advances. She is also a servant in the household of a predatory Booby.
What are the major themes of Joseph Andrews?
The helplessness and power of goodness, affection, vanity, charity and religion, hypocrisy and charity, town and country, class and birth, reality verses appearances etc are the major themes of Joseph Andrews.
Who is Surgeon in Joseph Andrews?
The Surgeon is a comic character in the novel. He tells Joseph that he will die soon due to his injuries.
Who is Parson Trulliber?
Parson Trulliber is a hypocritical country parson and he is a hog dealer. He is completely lacking the virtue of charity. He parsons only on Sunday
What different services were performed by Joseph for Sir Thomas Booby?
Joseph performed the different services for Sir Thomas as stable boy and then footman to Sir Thomas’ wife Lady Bobby.
Who is Mrs.Gammar Andrews? (parents of Fanny and Joseph Andrews)
Mrs. Gammar Andrews is the mother of Pamela Andrews and Fanny Goodwill. She has raised Joseph Andrews as her own son, although he is not. She lost Fanny when she was 18 months old and reclaims her at the end of the novel.