Welcome to English Literature and Linguistics, Join Online Classes (Only For Ladies)

MA ENGLISH LITERATURE

Showing posts with label NOVEL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NOVEL. Show all posts

Wednesday, 4 October 2023

SONS AND LOVERS PAST PAPERS

 Past papers

FEDERAL URDU UNIVERSITY

IMPORTANT QUESTIONS SONS AND LOVERS

Sons & Lovers

1.The damaging influence of mother's love upon the life of son.Does it describes the theme of "sons & lovers"? 2014

2.sons and lover present the Freudian Oedipus complex in most classical completeness.how far do you agree with the statment? 2015

3.Do you consider sons & lover as autobiographical novel.Discuss. 2016

4.Do you think paul is finally condemned for his necotic refusal of responsibility for his own existence?give reasons. 2017

5.What are DH Lawrence philosophy of life & views of civilization of society as expressed in ' sons & lovers'. 2018

IMPORTANT QUESTIONS - SONS AND LOVERS BY D.H. LAWRENCE

2. SONS AND LOVERS BY D.H. LAWRENCE
9. Answer the following questions.
(i) Write the names of four novels of D.H. Lawrence.
(ii) What is the setting of 'Sons and Lovers'?
(iii) What is the significance of the title 'Sons and Lovers'?
(iv) Why does D.H. Lawrence adopt the omniscient narrator in 'Sons and Lovers'?
(v) What are the major themes in 'Sons and Lovers'?
(vi) What is Oedipus complex?
(vii) How does 'Sons and Lovers' explore the Oedipus complex?
(viii) What relationships have been described in 'Sons and Lovers'?
(ix) Why is 'Sons and Lovers' a bildungsroman?
(x) What are the elements of Freudian psychoanalysis in 'Sons and Lovers'?
(xi) What is euthanasia? Who are the victims of euthanasia in 'Sons and Lovers'?
(xii) What are the factors that keep Morel family together in spite of their difference?
(xiii) Interpret 'He was an outsider. He had denied the God in him'.
(xiv) Who is Gertrude?
(xv) Who is Walter Morel?
10. Answer the following questions.
(i) Write the names of the children of Gertrude and Walter Morel?
(ii) What is the main reason Walter can't patch things with his family?
(iii) Do you have sympathy for Walter Morel? Why or why not?
(iv) Who is Paul Morel?
(v) Who is Marriam Lievers?
(vi) What goes wring between Paul and Mirriam?
(vii) Why does Mrs. Morel disapprove of Paul's relationship with Mirriam?
(viii) Who is Baxter Dawes?
(ix) Why was Baxter fired from his job?
(x) Why does Paul come to value his relationship with Baxter Dawes?
(xi) Who is Clara Dawes?
(xii) What are Clara's strong and weak points?
(xiii) Who is Annie Morel?
(xiv) Who is Mrs. Radford?
(xv) Who is Arthur Morel? 
11. Major Themes in 'Sons and Lovers'
12. 'Sons and Lovers' As an Autobiographical Novel 
13. Psychoanalytical and Feminist Approaches to 'Sons and Lovers'
14.Symbolism in 'Sons and Lovers'
15. Mother - Son Relationship in 'Sons and Lovers'
16. Walter Morel As a Tragic Character

Monday, 17 May 2021

A Tale of Two Cities as the least Dickensian of Dickens' novels

 Scholars describe A Tale of Two Cities as the least Dickensian of Dickens' novels, yet it remains one of Dickens' most widely read books. It was originally published in weekly installments in All the Year Round, from April 30 to November 29, 1859. From the book's inception, it received mixed critical reviews, but succeeded in capturing the imagination of general readers through its swift, exciting story and memorable rendering of the French Revolution.


The idea for A Tale of Two Cities originated in two main sources. Always interested in the interaction between individuals and society, Dickens was particularly intrigued by Thomas Carlyle's history, The French Revolution. He saw similarities between the forces that led to the Revolution and the oppression and unrest occurring in England in his own time. Although he supported the idea of people rising up against tyranny, the violence that characterized the French Revolution troubled him.


Dickens was also drawn to the themes inherent in The Frozen Deep, a play that Wilkie Collins wrote and in which Dickens acted. In the play, two men compete for the same woman, Clara Burnham. When she chooses Frank Aldersley over Richard Wardour, Wardour (played by Dickens) vows revenge upon his rival, even though he doesn't know who his rival is. While on an arctic expedition together, the two men get stranded. Wardour discovers that Aldersley is his rival, but instead of leaving him to die, Wardour overcomes his anger and saves Aldersley's life by carrying him to safety. Collapsing at Clara's feet, Wardour dies from his efforts while Clara weeps over him. The idea of Wardour's heroism and sacrifice strongly affected Dickens, and during the course of the play, as Dickens notes in the preface to A Tale of Two Cities, he "conceived the main idea of this story."


An examination of Dickens' personal life at the time he decided to write A Tale of Two Cities also reveals what may have motivated him to write this particular story. His marriage to Catherine Hogarth had been deteriorating for years, and in May 1858, they decided to separate. Meanwhile, he had met a young woman named Ellen Ternan while performing in The Frozen Deep, and began a clandestine relationship with her that would continue until his death. Additionally, a disagreement with his publishers at Household Words led to his resignation as editor and the creation of a new magazine, All the Year Round. Dickens used A Tale of Two Cities to launch the new magazine, and the themes of secrecy and upheaval that run throughout the book may be reflections of the experiences Dickens was encountering in his own life.


Dickens took a different approach to writing A Tale of Two Cities than to his previous novels and described the book as an experiment. Rather than relying upon dialogue to develop characters, Dickens instead relied upon the plot. Consequently, the characters are defined by their actions and by their place within the movement of the overall story. Critics have complained that this technique results in a loss of Dickens' strengths in his writing, including his sense of humor and his memorable characters. They agree, however, that Dickens' experiment created his most tightly plotted novel, in which the narrative moves along quickly and smoothly. The book's well-conceived structure neatly blends all of the storylines and characters, so that by the end of the book, no question remains as to how each element of the book impacts all the others.


Dickens' social ideas in this novel are straightforward: the French Revolution was inevitable because the aristocracy exploited and plundered the poor, driving them to revolt. Therefore, oppression on a large scale results in anarchy, and anarchy produces a police state. One of Dickens' strongest convictions was that the English people might erupt at any moment into a mass of bloody revolutionists. It is clear today that he was mistaken, but the idea was firmly planted in his mind, as well as in the minds of his contemporaries. A Tale of Two Cities was partly an attempt to show his readers the dangers of a possible revolution. This idea was not the first time a simple — and incorrect — conviction became the occasion for a serious and powerful work of art.


Violent revolutionary activity caught up almost all of Europe during the first half of the nineteenth century, and middle-class Englishmen naturally feared that widespread rebellion might take place at home. Dickens knew what poverty was like and how common it was. He realized the inadequacy of philanthropic institutions when confronted by the enormous misery of the slums. That Dickens turned to the French Revolution to dramatize the possibility of class uprisings is not surprising; few events in history offer such a concentration of terrors.

Wednesday, 18 November 2020

Novel short questions past papers uos solved

Novel Notes
                                       
​                    Joseph    Andrews
​Who is Lady Booby? UOS 2015-18
Lady Booby, the villainess of the story, is a middle-aged lectures and wife of Sir Thomas Booby. After the death of her husband she holds the control of Booby estate. She has lusty eye on the attractive, intelligent villager Joseph Andrews and makes him her footman.
​Who is Fanny? UOS 2015
Fanny Goodwill is a humble but beautiful dairy maid who is engaged to Joseph Andrews and loves him fiercely. She is an orphan who has been brought up on the Booby estate. In the recent past she was fired by Mrs. Slipslop.
​Who is Parson Adams and what is his role?  OR Who is Mr. Abraham Adams? UOS 2018
Parson Adams is a learned clergyman of Lady Booby’s parish estate. He has studied Latin and Greek. He has upright character and Christian charity. He serves himself as a picaresque companion for Joseph. He is a poor man and he is the firm pivot of the novel’s moral influence.
​Who is Parson Barnabas and what is his role? UOS 2014-16
Parson Barnabas is a high-Church Anglican clergyman. He takes pleasure is drinking punch. He disagrees with Parson Adams and believes Clergy people should not live in luxury
​Who is Betty? UOS 2016-17
She is a Chamber-maid in Tow-Wouse inn. She recommends of Joseph’s treatment and takes herself as Joseph’s nurse. She is also lustful and her association with him ends badly.
​Who is Squire Booby?
Squire Booby is the nephew of Sir Thomas and Lady Booby. He marries the servant Pamela Andrews. Squire Booby is a good man who frees Joseph from jail and accepts him as an equal. Because of class pride, however, he objects to Joseph's marriage to Fanny.
​Who is Mr. Wilson?
Mr. Wilson is a former rake and now a country squire whom Joseph Andrews meets on his journeys. Mr. Wilson offers Joseph Andrews, Parson Adams, and Fanny Goodwill hospitality.
Who is beau didapper? UOS 2016
Didapper is a rough, provoked by by Lady Booby to rape Fanny Goodwill so that Joseph’s marriage might be affected. Beau Didapper only has one role in Joseph Andrews: to cause mischief for Fanny and Joseph that will benefit Lady Booby
​Who were the real parents of Joseph?
Mr. and Mrs. Wilson were the real parents of Joseph
Who is Mrs. Slipslop?  UOS 2016-17-19
Slipslop is a foil and also a coarse echo of Lady Booby; she is vain and proud. She acts as she was one of the gentry, and she is sexually attracted to Joseph Andrews.
Who is Peter Pounce? 2019
Lady Booby's steward, a stingy, uncharitable man who on one occasion saves Fanny from rape but plans to enjoy her himself. He also loans oat money to the servants at exorbitant interest rates.
Who is Pamela Andrews?
Pamela Andrews is Joseph’s virtuous and beautiful sister, from whom he derives inspiration for his resistance to Lady Booby’s sexual advances. She is also a servant in the household of a predatory Booby.
What are the major themes of Joseph Andrews?
The helplessness and power of goodness, affection, vanity, charity and religion, hypocrisy and charity, town and country, class and birth, reality verses appearances etc are the major themes of Joseph Andrews.
Who is Surgeon in Joseph Andrews?
The Surgeon is a comic character in the novel. He tells Joseph that he will die soon due to his injuries.
Who is Parson Trulliber?
Parson Trulliber is a hypocritical country parson and he is a hog dealer. He is completely lacking the virtue of charity. He parsons only on Sunday
What different services were performed by Joseph for Sir Thomas Booby?
Joseph performed the different services for Sir Thomas as stable boy and then footman to Sir Thomas’ wife Lady Bobby.
Who is Mrs.Gammar Andrews? (parents of Fanny and Joseph Andrews)
Mrs. Gammar Andrews is the mother of Pamela Andrews and Fanny Goodwill. She has raised Joseph Andrews as her own son, although he is not. She lost Fanny when she was 18 months old and reclaims her at the end of the novel.


        
    PRIDE AND PREJUDICE 
Who is Mr.Collins? UOS 2013-16-17-19
Mr. William Collins is a distant cousin of Mr. Bennet who is a clergyman by profession and manages the estate of his patron Lady Catherine de Bourgh.
Who is Mrs.Bennet?  UOS 2017-18
Mrs. Bennet is a miraculously tiresome character. She is mother of five unmarried daughters who can go to any limit to get her daughters married to the wealthy suitors.
What do you know about Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy in Jane Austen’s novel, Pride and Prejudice? 2018
Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy is one of the central characters of the novel.  He is of proud and snobbish nature. At first, he rejects Elizabeth’s beauty by terming her merely “tolerable.” But his character changes and he secretly helps Bennet’s family to protect their honour by forcing Wickham to marry Lydia who has eloped with each other.
Who is Mr.Bennet?
Mr Bennet the patriarch of the Bennet family, a gentleman of modest income with five unmarried daughters. Mr. Bennet has a sarcastic, cynical sense of humor. Though he loves his daughters, he often fails to provide a secure financial future for his wife and daughters.

Who is Charlotte Lucas in Novel? Pride and Prejudice UOS 2015-2019
Charlotte Lucas is Elizabeth’s sensible and intelligent friend. He does not view love as the most vital component of a marriage.He takes marriage for security than love.
Who is Jane Bennet?
Jane Bennet is the eldest and most beautiful Bennet sister. Jane is more reserved and gentler than Elizabeth. She falls in love with Bingley.
Who is Charles Bingley? UOS 2015
Charles Bingley is Darcy’s wealthy best friend. He is genial, well-intentioned gentleman. He is married to Jane Bennet and is the brother of Louisa Hurst and Caroline Bingley. He is blissfully uncaring out class differences.
Who is Lydia Bennet? Why did she elope? UOS 2016
The youngest Bennet sister, she is gossip, immature and self-involved. Unlike Elizabeth, Lydia flings herself headlong into romance. She elopes with Wickham as a result of his black magic of persuasive power. 
Who is Miss Caroline Bingley?
Miss Bingley is Bingley’s snobbish sister who befriends Jane and later snubs her. She attempts to attract Darcy’s attentions and is jealous when Darcy is instead drawn to Elizabeth.


What kind of Woman is Lady Catherine De Bourgh?
She is Darcy’s arrogant aunt, who dominates Mr. Collins and entertains hopes that her daughter will marry to Darcy.
Who is George Wickham?
George Wickham is a handsome and personable fortune hunter to whom Elizabeth is initially attracted. He eventually runs off with and is forced to marry Lydia.
Who is Colonel Fitzwiliam?
He is Darcy’s well-mannered and pleasant cousin, who is interested in Elizabeth, but who needs to marry someone with money.
Who is Mrs. Hurst?
Mrs. Hurst is Bingley’s snobbish sister. She spends most of her time gossiping with Caroline.


        A Tale of Two Cities 
Who is Miss Prose? UOS 2016- 2019
Miss Prose is the servant who raised Lucie. She is loyal to her mistress. Miss Prose is a comic character. She at the end of novel quarrel with Madam Defarge and Madam Defarge was killed by her own pistol shot.
Who is Jerry Cruncher? UOS  2015-17
Jerry Cruncher is an old employer in Tillson’s Bank. He called himself a “Resurrection-Man,” because he digs up dead bodies and sells them to scientists. He gains his income through digging up the graves and selling the dead bodies to medical scientists.
Who is Jarvis Lorry?
Jarvis Lorry is a banker who works out of Tellson's bank, which has a branch in Paris. When Lucie Manette becomes an orphan after her father is mysteriously imprisoned in the Bastille and her mother dies, Lorry brings her back to England to be raised there.
Where was Mr.Javrish Lorry traveling ? UOS 2018
Mr.Javrish Lorry was traveling towards Parish during the callous French Revolution to protect the branch and important documents of Tillson’s Bank in Paris 1792.


Where was Alexander Manette imprisoned and how long? UOS 2018
He is Lucie's father and a brilliant physician, during French Revolution he was imprisoned in Bastille for 18 years.
Why  Alexander Manette was imprisoned?Dr. Alxander Manette was imprisoned because he knew about the crimes committed by the Evermonde brothers and had attempted to expose them to the authorities.
Who is Madame Therese Defarge?
Madame Defarge is a fictional character in the novel. She is  Earnest Defarge’s wife. Unlike her husband, she proves unrelentingly blood-thirsty, and her lust for vengeance knows no bounds. She is a cruel and vindictive lady who exacts revenge against the Evermonde family.
What is the role of Sydney Carton in “A Tale of Two Cities”?  UOS2015
Sydney Carton is a central character in Charles Dickens' novel A Tale of Two Cities. Sydney Carton is a lawyer who looks like Charles Darnay and who lives in a fog of apathy and alcohol. He wasted his great potential and mysteriously lost a woman he loved. Now he's a drunk and a lawyer who takes no credit for his work. Carton has no hope for his life.
Who is Charles Darnay?
Charles Darnay is a French aristocrat. Darnay renounces his family name of St. Evrémonde and moves to England, where he works as a tutor and eventually marries Lucie Manette.  Charles believes in the revolutionary ideal of liberty, but is not a radical revolutionary. He is put on trial during the Revolution for the crimes of his family.
What is the significance of knitting in A Tale of Two Cities? UOS 2017-19
Madam Defarge’s Knitting through a needle and a thread on a piece of cloths determine the fate of the victims of the so called newly established republic. Her knitting is a symbol of cold-bloodedness and cruelty.
Who is Lucie Manette?A young French woman who grew up in England, Lucie was raised as a ward of Tellson’s Bank because her parents were assumed dead.
Who is Ernest Defarge
Ernest Defarge was owner of a wine-shop in a Paris. She was leader of the Jacquerie (a roving band of peasants) during the French Revolution. She formerly worked as a servant for Doctor Manette.


​      The Mill on the Floss
Write the names of four novels of George Eliot.
Ans. Adam Bede (1859), The Mill on the Floss (1860), Silas Marner (1861), Romola (1863), Felix Holt, the Radical (1866), Middlemarch (1871-72) and Daniel Deronda (1876) are the novels of George Eliot.
Who is Philip Wakem?
Philip Wakem is Son of the lawyer. He has been deformed in a childhood accident and is highly sensitive about it. An artist of moderate talent, he falls in love with Maggie when they meet at the school Philip and Tom attend together.
Who is Sir Stephan Wakem? UOS 2018
Mr. Waken is a lawyer who represents Mr. Pivart against Mr. Tulliver in court in their dispute over water rights. He eventually ends up buying Tulliver's mill and hiring him back as a tenant to manage it. He is Philip Wakem's father.
What are the major themes of 'The Mill on the Floss'?          
Loss of innocence, the difficulty of choice, the claim of the past upon present identity, the importance of sympathy, the effect of society upon the individual, communal verses individual interests, progress verses tradition, practical knowledge verses bookish knowledge, gender disparity and love are the major themes of "The Mill on the Floss".
Who is Maggie Tulliver?
Maggie Tulliver is the protagonist of the novel "The Mill on the Floss". She is a hugely complex character. She is the intelligent, clever and emotionally sensitive daughter of a country mill-owner. Her closest tie is to her brother Tom. She has dark skin, dark hair, and dark eyes. Her life is the central story of the novel.
Who is Bob Jakin? Describe his personality UOS 15-2017
Bob Jakin is the childhood friend of Tom Tulliver and a comic character in the novel. He is a packman. He is a cool and nice person. He helps Tom and his family.
Who is Lucy Deane? UOS 2017-18-19                                   Lucy Deane is Tom and Maggie's cousin and a year younger than Maggie. She is the daughter of Susan Deane. She is amiable, kind and compassionate.
Who is Mrs. Jane Glegg discuss her character?                                                                          
Mrs. Glegg is the sister of Mrs. Tulliver and aunt of Tom and Maggie. She is oldest of Dodson sisters and she preserved the family traditions. She is careful in use of money. Mrs. Glegg is a character that creates amusement in the novel. She shows superiority and strict to family traditions
Describe the personality of  Tom Tulliver? 2015            
Tom Tulliver is the Tullivers' older son. He has his own clear sense of duty, justice, and fairness. He has affection for his sister Maggie, but he dislikes her impetus way of doing what she wants. When Mr. Tulliver goes bankrupt, Tom goes to work at a young age and brings the family out of debt.
Who is Stephen Guest UOS 2015                                     
  Stephen Guest is courting Lucy Deane when we meet him but has not yet proposed marriage. He is the son of the senior partner of Guest & Co., where both Tom and Mr. Deane work. Stephen is handsome and self-assured. He falls unexpectedly in love with Maggie, drawn to her strikingly different qualities.
How flood is symbolic in the novel ‘The Mill on the Floss’?
Generally flood symbolizes destruction and in this novel it symbolizes the destruction of Tulliver family.
What does the river Floss symbolizes in the novel?
River generally symbolizes life but river Floss in this novel is the source of income and destruction for Tulliver’s family. River Floss also symbolizes Maggie’s character, the depth of Floss presents deep emotions of Maggie and unpredictable paths of Floss represent the Maggie’s thoughts.
Who is Dr. Kenn?
Dr. Kenn is a highly respected and kindly clergyman who attempts to help Maggie when she returns to St. Ogg's in disgrace
Who is  Mr. James Torry
James Torry Is one of the middle-class set in St. Ogg's who dances with Maggie at the Guests' and is attracted to her. After she comes back from her elopement he treats her disrespectfully.
Who is Mrs. Sophy Pullet?
Mrs. Sophy Pullet is one of the Dodson clan and Tom and Maggie's aunt on their mother's side. She likes to dress well and tends to be dramatic, especially about illness and death. She is a hypochondriac.


Sunday, 6 September 2020

Sunday, 23 August 2020

THOMAS HARDY AS A GREAT NOVELIST

Thursday, 13 August 2020

RETURN OF THE NATIVE PAST PAPERS

 2018supply

Q. Discuss the role of time and the effect of it's passage in Hardy's Return of the Native.

Q. Write a critical note on Characterization in Return of the Native.


2019a 

Q. The concept of Hardy's fatalism expressed  in Return of the Native is that human character and action are the result of the laws of heredity and environment over which man has no control. Discuss

Q. Write a critical note on Edgon Heath as a character in Return of the Native.


2019supply 

Q. Discuss in detail how misunderstandings of motives, ambitions and perceptions propel the plot in Hardy's Return of the Native.

Q. Write a critical note on Theme of Human frailty against nature in Return of the Native.

Monday, 10 August 2020

Pride and Prejudice Past Papers 2011 TO 2019 S

 Pride and Prejudice Past Papers

 

2011

Q. Critically examine the events and characters in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice in the light of the title of novel.

Q. Compare and contrast bennet sisters in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice.

Q. Note on Character sketch of Elizabeth Bennet

 

2012

Q. Critically analyse the male characters in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice.

 DARCY

MR BENNET

WICHAM

 BINGLEY

MR COLLINS

Q. Note on  Jane Austen’s heroin in Pride and Prejudice.

 

2013

Q. Through 4 marriages in Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen defines good and bad reasons for marriage. Discuss

Q. Note on Element of satire in Austen’s Pride and Prejudice.

 

2014

Q. “The plot of Pride and Prejudice has an exactness of structure and symmetry of form”. Discuss

Q. “Jane Austen was the moralist of 18th century”. Do u agree?

 

2015

Q.“Jane Austen described life as a matrimonial game” How far do you agree with this statement.

R. IT IS A TRUTH UNIVERSALY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT A MAN IN POSSESSION OF A GOOD FORTUNE  MUST BE IN WANT OF WIFR

 

2016

Q. “PRIDE AND PREJUDICE IS simultaneously HIGH COMEDY, DEVASTATING SATIRE AND COMPASSIONATE PANORAMA.” SUBSTANTIATE CRITICALLY.

Q. Critically evaluate how Jane Austen integrates social concerns of her age in Pride and Prejudice?

 

2017

Q. Explore the significance of social class in Austen's pride and prejudice. And how it impacts relationships and marriage.

Q. Note on  Humour in Pride and Prejudice.

 

2018

Q. DISCUSS HOW JANE AUSTIN USES IRONY AND SATIRE IN PRIDE AND PREJUDICE TO CRITICIZE VARIOUS ASPECTS OF 19TH CENTURY ENGLISH SOCIETY.

Q. Note on Elizabeth Bennet in Pride and Prejudice.

 

2018supply

Q. "Happiness in marriage is entirely a matter of chance." How far do you agree with Charlotte's view of matrimony in Austen's Pride and Prejudice?

Q. Note on The Aristocracy in Pride and Prejudice.

 

2019

Q. Critically examine the nature of Love and Romance in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice highlighting its socio-economic implications.

Q. Austen's Pride and Prejudice is a classic comedy of manners which satirizes 18th century society, particularly the expectations from women. Explain.

Comedy of manners, witty, cerebral form of dramatic comedy that depicts and often satirizes the manners and affectations of a contemporary society. A comedy of manners is concerned with social usage and the question of whether or not characters meet certain social standards.

Q. Note on Role of Mr Bennet in Pride and Prejudice.

 

2019supply

Q. Critically comment on how Jane Austen’s  Pride and Prejudice exposes class distinction and struggle, social norms and rules and the fact that money runs society.

Q. Critically analyse the character, motivation and actions of male suitors in Austen’s Pride and Prejudice.

 

Friday, 19 June 2020

Character sketch of JAMES SMITH THINGS FALL APART

Give a character sketch of James Smith.

James Smith, the successor of Mr. Brown, was a hard task master. He was of the view that kingdom of God did not depend on large crowds. He stressed the importance of the few who could convey the message of God in the earnest spirit.
He said, "Our Lord used the whip only once in his life—to drive the crowd away from his church." He loved decency. Within a few days of his taking over the charge from Mr. Brown, he suspended a young woman from the church for pouring new wine into old bottles. This woman had also allowed her husband to mutilate her dead child for the fear of its entering her womb to be born and lose again. He said, "Narrow is the way and few the number, to fill the Lord's holy temple with an idolatrous crowd clamouring for signs was folly of everlasting consequence."
He was opposed to Mr. Brown's policies of compromise and adjustment. He found certain evils in the administration of church activities and removed them. He condemned Enoch's behaviour at the meeting of the leaders of the church. He also rebuked Okeke his interpreter for supporting Enoch for his unbecoming and indecent behaviour. Okeke advised his master that Enoch should not be hidden in the church because he would draw the wrath of the clan but Mr. Smith did not agree to what he said. He detected so many evil customs prevailing in Ibo society such as throwing away the twins and mutilating the dead children and condemned these as inhuman. According to him Mr. Brown's lenient outlook contributed much to flourish such evils. After his arrival in Umuofia, he found everything topsy-turvy. He saw things as black and white. "He saw the world, as a battlefield in which the children of light were locked in mortal conflict with the sons of darkness." He believed in slaying the false deities of the Ibo people.
Mr. Smith was bold. He faced the attack of masked spirits boldly When the spirits came, he walked quietly to the door which commanded the approach to the church compound, and stood there. But when the first three or four egwugwu appeared on the church compound, he nearly bolted. He overcome his impulse and instead of running away, he went down the two steps that led up to the church and walked towards the approaching spirits.
It was for the first time that Mr. Smith was a little afraid, when he heard the mother of spirits wailing for her son. The chilling sound affected Mr. Smith and he was at a loss to understand how to face the challenge posed by the ancestral spirits of the clan.
Ajofia, the leader of the ancestral spirits asked Smith to go back to his land leaving their village. He told him that they would not harm him but the church would be destroyed because it had bred untold abominations in Ibo society. He added that his anger was great but he had held it down so that he might talk to him. In reply Mr. Smith said to his interpreter to ask them to go away from there, Mr. Smith said that the church was the house of God and that he would rather die than permit the spirits to destroy the house of God. The interpretor did not repeat Mr. Smith's words as it is to the ancestral spirits. He acted wisely and told the crowd that the whiteman had said that he was happy to meet them and he would try to remove their grievances. Thus, the interpreter put off the danger which might prove fatal to Mr. Smith's life. Mr. Smith stood his ground. But he could not save his church which was reduced to a pile of earth and ashes.
It is taken for granted that Mr. Smith proved victorious in his mission. But this all happened due to the might of the government's power exercised by the District Commissioner. He was opposed to Mr. Brown in thought and action. His approach was dictatorial and not humanitarian like that of Mr. Brown. He was true to his creed. He preferred death to demolition of the church at native's hands.


Sunday, 14 June 2020

Tale of the two cities by Charles Dickens

#English_Novel
#A_Tale_of_Two_Cities
By
#Charles_Dickens
#Summary
#Character_List
#Theme

#Character_List
▪Charles Darnay
A French aristocrat by birth, Darnay chooses to live in England because he cannot bear to be associated with the cruel injustices of the French social system. Darnay displays great virtue in his rejection of the snobbish and cruel values of his uncle, the Marquis Evrémonde. He exhibits an admirable honesty in his decision to reveal to Doctor Manette his true identity as a member of the infamous Evrémonde family. So, too, does he prove his courage in his decision to return to Paris at great personal risk to save the imprisoned Gabelle.

▪Sydney Carton
An insolent, indifferent, and alcoholic attorney who works with Stryver. Carton has no real prospects in life and doesn’t seem to be in pursuit of any. He does, however, love Lucie, and his feelings for her eventually transform him into a man of profound merit. At first, the polar opposite of Darnay, in the end, Carton morally surpasses the man to whom he bears a striking physical resemblance.

▪Doctor Manette
Lucie’s father and a brilliant physician, Doctor Manette spent eighteen years as a prisoner in the Bastille. At the start of the novel, Manette does nothing but make shoes, a hobby that he adopted to distract himself from the tortures of prison. As he overcomes his past as a prisoner, however, he proves to be a kind, loving father who prizes his daughter’s happiness above all things.

▪Lucie Manette
A young French woman who grew up in England, Lucie was raised as a ward of Tellson’s Bank because her parents were assumed dead. Dickens depicts Lucie as an archetype of compassion. Her love has the power to bind her family together—the text often refers to her as the “golden thread.” Furthermore, her love has the power to transform those around her. It enables her father to be “recalled to life,” and it sparks Sydney Carton’s development from a “jackal” into a hero.

▪Monsieur Defarge
A wine shop owner and revolutionary in the poor Saint Antoine section of Paris, Monsieur Defarge formerly worked as a servant for Doctor Manette. Defarge proves an intelligent and committed revolutionary, a natural leader. Although he remains dedicated to bringing about a better society at any cost, he does demonstrate a kindness toward Manette. His wife, Madame Defarge, views this consideration for Manette as a weakness.

▪Madame Defarge
A cruel revolutionary whose hatred of the aristocracy fuels her tireless crusade, Madame Defarge spends a good deal of the novel knitting a register of everyone who must die for the revolutionary cause. Unlike her husband, she proves unrelentingly blood-thirsty, and her lust for vengeance knows no bounds.

▪Jarvis Lorry
An elderly businessman who works for Tellson’s Bank, Mr Lorry is a very business-oriented bachelor with a strong moral sense and a good, honest heart. He proves trustworthy and loyal, and Doctor Manette and Lucie come to value him as a personal friend.

▪Jerry Cruncher
An odd-job man for Tellson’s Bank, Cruncher is gruff, short-tempered, superstitious, and uneducated. He supplements his income by working as a “Resurrection-Man,” one who digs up dead bodies and sells them to scientists.

▪Miss Pross
The servant who raised Lucie, Miss Pross is brusque, tough, and fiercely loyal to her mistress. Because she personifies order and loyalty, she provides the perfect foil to Madame Defarge, who epitomizes the violent chaos of the revolution.

▪Marquis Evrémonde
Charles Darnay’s uncle, the Marquis Evrémonde is a French aristocrat who embodies an inhumanly cruel caste system. He shows absolutely no regard for human life and wishes that the peasants of the world would be exterminated.

▪Mr Stryver
An ambitious lawyer, Stryver dreams of climbing the social ladder. Unlike his associate, Sydney Carton, Stryver is bombastic, proud, and foolish.

▪John Barsad
Like Roger Cly, John Barsad is a British spy who swears that patriotism is his only motive. Barsad falsely claims to be a virtuous man of upstanding reputation.

▪Roger Cly
Like John Barsad, Roger Cly is a British spy who swears that patriotism alone inspires all of his actions. Cly feigns honesty but in fact, constantly participates in conniving schemes.

▪Gabelle
The man charged with keeping up the Evrémonde estate after the Marquis’ death, Gabelle is imprisoned by the revolutionaries. News of his internment prompts Darnay to travel to France to save him.

🔴Summary🔴

The year is 1775, and social ills plague both France and England. Jerry Cruncher, an odd-job man who works for Tellson’s Bank, stops the Dover mail-coach with an urgent message for Jarvis Lorry. The message instructs Lorry to wait at Dover for a young woman, and Lorry responds with the cryptic words, “Recalled to Life.” At Dover, Lorry is met by Lucie Manette, a young orphan whose father, a once-eminent doctor whom she supposed dead, has been discovered in France. Lorry escorts Lucie to Paris, where they meet Defarge, a former servant of Doctor Manette, who has kept Manette safe in a garret. Driven mad by eighteen years in the Bastille, Manette spends all of his time making shoes, a hobby he learned while in prison. Lorry assures Lucie that her love and devotion can recall her father to life, and indeed they do.

The year is now 1780. Charles Darnay stands accused of treason against the English crown. A bombastic lawyer named Stryver pleads Darnay’s case, but it is not until his drunk, good-for-nothing colleague, Sydney Carton, assists him that the court acquits Darnay. Carton clinches his argument by pointing out that he himself bears an uncanny resemblance to the defendant, which undermines the prosecution’s case for unmistakably identifying Darnay as the spy the authorities spotted. Lucie and Doctor Manette watched the court proceedings, and that night, Carton escorts Darnay to a tavern and asks how it feels to receive the sympathy of a woman like Lucie. Carton despises and resents Darnay because he reminds him of all that he himself has given up and might have been.

In France, the cruel Marquis Evrémonde runs down a plebian child with his carriage. Manifesting an attitude typical of the aristocracy in regard to the poor at that time, the Marquis shows no regret, but instead curses the peasantry and hurries home to his chateau, where he awaits the arrival of his nephew, Darnay, from England. Arriving later that night, Darnay curses his uncle and the French aristocracy for its abominable treatment of the people. He renounces his identity as an Evrémonde and announces his intention to return to England. That night, the Marquis is murdered; the murderer has left a note signed with the nickname adopted by French revolutionaries: “Jacques.”

A year passes, and Darnay asks Manette for permission to marry Lucie. He says that, if Lucie accepts, he will reveal his true identity to Manette. Carton, meanwhile, also pledges his love to Lucie, admitting that, though his life is worthless, she has helped him dream of a better, more valuable existence. On the streets of London, Jerry Cruncher gets swept up in the funeral procession for a spy named Roger Cly. Later that night, he demonstrates his talents as a “Resurrection-Man,” sneaking into the cemetery to steal and sell Cly’s body. In Paris, meanwhile, another English spy known as John Barsad drops into Defarge’s wine shop. Barsad hopes to turn up evidence concerning the mounting revolution, which is still in its covert stages. Madame Defarge sits in the shop knitting a secret registry of those whom the revolution seeks to execute. Back in London, Darnay, on the morning of his wedding, keeps his promise to Manette; he reveals his true identity and, that night, Manette relapses into his old prison habit of making shoes. After nine days, Manette regains his presence of mind and soon joins the newlyweds on their honeymoon. Upon Darnay’s return, Carton pays him a visit and asks for his friendship. Darnay assures Carton that he is always welcome in their home.

The year is now 1789. The peasants in Paris storm the Bastille and the French Revolution begins. The revolutionaries murder aristocrats in the streets, and Gabelle, a man charged with the maintenance of the Evrémonde estate, is imprisoned. Three years later, he writes to Darnay, asking to be rescued. Despite the threat of great danger to his person, Darnay departs immediately for France.

As soon as Darnay arrives in Paris, the French revolutionaries arrest him as an immigrant. Lucie and Manette make their way to Paris in hopes of saving him. Darnay remains in prison for a year and three months before receiving a trial. In order to help free him, Manette uses his considerable influence with the revolutionaries, who sympathize with him for having served time in the Bastille. Darnay receives an acquittal, but that same night he is arrested again. The charges, this time, come from Defarge and his vengeful wife. Carton arrives in Paris with a plan to rescue Darnay and obtains the help of John Barsad, who turns out to be Solomon Pross, the long-lost brother of Miss Pross, Lucie’s loyal servant.

At Darnay’s trial, Defarge produces a letter that he discovered in Manette’s old jail cell in the Bastille. The letter explains the cause of Manette’s imprisonment. Years ago, the brothers Evrémonde (Darnay’s father and uncle) enlisted Manette’s medical assistance. They asked him to tend to a woman, whom one of the brothers had raped, and her brother, whom the same brother had stabbed fatally. Fearing that Manette might report their misdeeds, the Evrémondes had him arrested. Upon hearing this story, the jury condemns Darnay for the crimes of his ancestors and sentences him to die within twenty-four hours. That night, at the Defarge’s wine shop, Carton overhears Madame Defarge plotting to have Lucie and her daughter (also Darnay’s daughter) executed as well; Madame Defarge, it turns out, is the surviving sibling of the man and woman killed by the Evrémondes. Carton arranges for the Manettes’ immediate departure from France. He then visits Darnay in prison, tricks him into changing clothes with him, and, after dictating a letter of explanation, drugs his friend unconscious. Barsad carries Darnay, now disguised as Carton, to an awaiting coach, while Carton, disguised as Darnay, awaits execution. As Darnay, Lucie, their child, and Dr Manette speed away from Paris, Madame Defarge arrives at Lucie’s apartment, hoping to arrest her. There she finds the supremely protective Miss Pross. A scuffle ensues, and Madame Defarge dies by the bullet of her own gun. Sydney Carton meets his death at the guillotine, and the narrator confidently asserts that Carton dies with the knowledge that he has finally imbued his life with meaning.

🔴Theme🔴
▪The Ever-Present Possibility of Resurrection.

With A Tale of Two Cities, Dickens asserts his belief in the possibility of resurrection and transformation, both on a personal level and on a societal level. The narrative suggests that Sydney Carton’s death secures a new, peaceful life for Lucie Manette, Charles Darnay, and even Carton himself. By delivering himself to the guillotine, Carton ascends to the plane of heroism, becoming a Christ-like figure whose death serves to save the lives of others. His own life thus gains meaning and value. Moreover, the final pages of the novel suggest that, like Christ, Carton will be resurrected—Carton is reborn in the hearts of those he has died to save. Similarly, the text implies that the death of the old regime in France prepares the way for the beautiful and renewed Paris that Carton supposedly envisions from the guillotine. Although Carton spends most of the novel in a life of indolence and apathy, the supreme selflessness of his final act speaks to a human capacity for change. Although the novel dedicates much time to describing the atrocities committed both by the aristocracy and by the outraged peasants, it ultimately expresses the belief that this violence will give way to a new and better society.

Dickens elaborates his theme with the character of Doctor Manette. Early on in the novel, Lorry holds an imaginary conversation with him in which he says that Manette has been “recalled to life.” As this statement implies, the doctor’s eighteen-year imprisonment has constituted a death of sorts. Lucie’s love enables Manette’s spiritual renewal, and her maternal cradling of him on her breast reinforces this notion of rebirth.

▪The Necessity of Sacrifice
Connected to the theme of the possibility of resurrection is the notion that sacrifice is necessary to achieve happiness. Dickens examines this second theme, again, on both a national and personal level. For example, the revolutionaries prove that a new, egalitarian French republic can come about only with a heavy and terrible cost—personal loves and loyalties must be sacrificed for the good of the nation. Also, when Darnay is arrested for the second time, in Book the Third, Chapter 7, the guard who seizes him reminds Manette of the primacy of state interests over personal loyalties. Moreover, Madame Defarge gives her husband a similar lesson when she chastises him for his devotion to Manette—an emotion that, in her opinion, only clouds his obligation to the revolutionary cause. Most important, Carton’s transformation into a man of moral worth dependstheon his sacrificing of his former self. In choosing to die for his friends, Carton not only enables their happiness but also ensures his spiritual rebirth.

▪The Tendency Toward Violence and Oppression in Revolutionaries.

Throughout the novel, Dickens approaches his historical subject with some ambivalence. While he supports the revolutionary cause, he often points to the evil of the revolutionaries themselves. Dickens deeply sympathizes with the plight of the French peasantry and emphasizes their need for liberation. The several chapters that deal with the Marquis Evrémonde successfully paint a picture of a vicious aristocracy that shamelessly exploits and oppresses the nation’s poor. Although Dickens condemns this oppression, however, he also condemns the peasants’ strategies in overcoming it. For in fighting cruelty with cruelty, the peaaffecteffect no true revolution; rather, they only perpetuate the violence that they themselves have suffered. Dickens makes his stance clear in his suspicious and cautionary depictions of the mobs. The scenes in which the people sharpen their weapons at the grindstone and dance the grisly Carmagnole come across as deeply macabre. Dickens’s most concise and relevant view of revolution comes in the final chapter, in which he notes the slippery slope down from the oppressed to the oppressor: “Sow the same seed of rapacious license and oppression over again, and it will surely yield the same fruit according to its kind.” Though Dickens sees the French Revolution as a great symbol of transformation and resurrection, he emphasizes that its violent means were ultimately antithetical to its end.

▪Sacrifice
The theme of sacrifice is most strongly apparent in Sydney Carton’s decision to take Charles Darnay’s place, even though doing so means being executed. When the seamstress asks Carton if he is dying for the sake of Darnay, Carton agrees, and adds “And his wife and child”. Carton’s love for Lucie and her daughter encourages him to sacrifice himself because her happiness is more important than anything else. As a man who does not have a family of his own, he places more value on Darnay’s life than on his own. Carton is also aware that he has lived an unproductive and dissolute life, and that he has not offered much to the world. Carton believes that his act of sacrifice will redeem everything that has come before, and make his life meaningful. As he reacts to himself, “It is a far, far better thing that that doo than I have ever done before”.

▪Class
Social inequality and class conflict are sources of violent disruption and revolution in France. For generations, aristocrats like Monseigneur have thought of nothing else except their own pleasure and luxury. The narrator sarcastically parodies the pretentions of the upper-classes by describing how four servants are involved in serving an aristocrat his morning cup of chocolate, and noting that “Deep would have been the blot upon his escutcheon if his chocolate had been ignobly waited on by only three men”. Not only are the French aristocrats presented as spoiled and lazy, but they are also shown to be heartless and lacking in any regard for the lives lower classes. Monseigneur cruelly tells working-class class Parisians that “I would ride over any of you very willingly, and exterminate you from the earth”. I of class adds an important element of moral complexity to the novel because Dickens presents both the cruelty of the upper-classes and the brute violence of the lower-classes in equally damning terms.

▪Justice
Justice appears in the novel both in terms of the institutions that are supposed to serve it (courts and so on) as well as something that individuals struggle to achieve outside of those institutions. Justice is represented literally by the series of trials and imprisonments interwoven through the plot, including Doctor Manette’s lengthy imprisonment, Darney’s trial in London, and then his additional imprisonment and trial in France. While these plot episodes feature legal structures that are designed to bring individuals to justice, the courts and prisons largely subject innocent people to suffering. Perhaps because legal forms of justice so often prove incompetent, characters are also very invested in taking justice into their own hands. After Gaspard’s son is killed by the Marquis’s carriage, he knows he will never receive legal justice against a powerful man so he kills the Marquis himself. Likewise, Madame Defarge has been plotting revenge against the Evremonde family for decades because their wealth and status allowed them to commit terrible crimes against her family and evade legal


Wednesday, 10 June 2020

The philosophy of THOMAS HARDY

#The Philosophy of Thomas Hardy
☆Hardy: An Artist and Not a Philosopher
Hardy was an artist and not a philosopher. He repeatedly affirmed that the ‘Views’ expressed in his novels were not his convictions or beliefs; they were simply “impressions” of the moment. His writings were all, ‘mood dictated’, merely, ‘explorations of reality’, and so it would be wrong to expect any systematised philosophy of life. But when certain impressions persist and are constantly repeated in the creative works, diaries and letters, of a writer, the readers may be pardoned, if they take them to be his convictions. Moreover, Hardy is so often passing from particular facts to life in general that we may safely take some of his views to be his philosophy of life.

☆Suffering: A Universal
In Hardy’s considered view, all life is suffering. Man suffers from the moment of his birth upto his death. Happiness is only occasional, it is never the general rule. As he says in “Vie Mayor of Casterbridge’, “Happiness is but an occasional episode in a general drama of pain”. There is none who gets more than he deserves but there are many who get much less than what they deserve. Not only man suffers, but all nature suffers. Suffering is writ large on the face of nature. A ruthless, brutal struggle for existence is waged everywhere in nature. All nature is red in tooth and claw and life lives upon life. Thus all life, including human life, is subject to this law of suffering and none can escape the operation of this law.
Imperfections of the First Cause: Human Suffering
But what is the cause of this universal suffering of man and nature alike. In Hardy’s view the real cause is the, “imperfection of the laws that may be in force on high.” Thus human suffering is the result of the imperfections of the First Cause, the power that caused or created this sorry scheme of things. He rejects the orthodox Christian belief that this power is benevolent, all merciful, omnipotent and omniscient. He cannot reconcile the fact of universal, undeserved suffering with the omnipotence and benevolence of God or the First Cause. He indignantly asks, “What makes suffering and evil, necessary to its omnipotence ?” He regards this power as blind, indifferent, if not actually hostile, and unconscious and immoral. He uses ‘it’ and not ‘He’ for this power. This power has no sense of right or wrong, love or hate. In this blind, unconscious, impersonal working, it does not, and cannot, take into account human wishes and aspirations. Hence its working often causes men .much pain and suffering.
Nature as Instrument of the First Cause
This power manifests itself in a number of ways. Sometimes, it expresses itself through some force of Nature. Usually Nature in Hardy remains indifferent to, and unconscious of, the suffering of Hardy’s character. For example, Tess’ suffering goes unheeded in Nature. She is violated in the lap of Nature, but all Nature remains unconcerned and indifferent. But sometimes, Nature seems to work against the characters of Hardy, or we, in our sympathy for them, feel nature to be hostile. The Return of the Native is a tragedy of character and environment; Egdon Heath plays a prominent part in the novel and is largely responsible for the tragedy. In the Mayor of Casterbridge, the very stars seem to be hostile to Henchard. The fair organised by him, with such generosity and care, is ruined by untimely unexpected rain. The vagaries of weather ruin him financially and make him a bankrupt. Bad weather had been foretold and on that basis he made reckless purchases. But the weather cleared and he had to sell at far lower prices. Then quite unaccountably the weather changed again. There was rain and hail and Henchard was a financial wreck. Nature, thus, seems to be the instrument of some hostile power working against Henchard. It is in this sense that Nature is fate in Hardy’s novels.
The Irony of Circumstance or Life
Sometimes, the ruling power on high expresses itself through the irony of circumstance. By irony of circumstance, Hardy simply means that in this ill-conceived scheme of things the contrary always happens. We except one thing and get its exact opposite. This results in much undeserved suffering. Right things never happen at the right time : they happen either not at all, or too late, when their happening brings nothing but misery and suffering in their train. The heroines of Hardy, like Tess and Eustacia, as well as his male characters, like Clym, Henchard, Angel, Alec are all the victims of the irony of circumstance. The wrong man comes first, and when the right man comes it is too late. Thus Tess remained a vague, fleeting impression to Angel Clare, till she had been violated by Alec, and it was too late for them to live happily together.
Elizabeth-Jane consents to take up Henchard’s name, and then he suddenly discovers that she was not his daughter : “77ie mockery (irony) was, that he should have no sooner taught a girl to claim the shelter of his paternity than he discovered her to have no kinship with him. This ironical sequence of things angered him like an impish trick from a fellow-creature. Like Prester John’s his table had been spread, and infernal harpies had snatched up the food.”
He had planned and schemed for months to have Jane as his daughter and now the fruition of the whole scheme was such, “dust and ashes” in his mouth.
Elizabeth-Jane, too, is the victim of this very irony of fate, for, “Continually it had happened that what she had desired had not been granted her, and that what had been granted her she had not desired.”
In fact, Hardy’s characters in general, and not in one or two novels alone, are the victims of this irony. Their intentions and aspirations are constantly frustrated, as if some hostile power were working against them.
The Role of Chance and Fate
There is a great difference between chance and irony of circumstance. Chance is entirely unexpected or accidental and has no relation either to character or to the course of action, while the essence of irony of fate or circumstance is its opposition to the whishes or merits of a particular character. Chance may sometimes work in favour of a particular character, but in Hardy’s works it always operates against them, for it is caused by the same indifferent, even hostile, First Cause. Thus Chance is another agent chosen by the Supreme to express itself. Chance or accident plays an important part in life and so in the novels of Hardy. The unexpected and the undesired always happens. Thus Tess suffers because the letter she had written to Angel on the eve of their marriage never reaches him. By chance it slips beneath the carpet and is not found. Many such accidents or chance events also happen in 77ie Mayor of Casterbridge. The coming of Farfrae in Casterbridge just at the time when Henchard was being taken to task for the sale of bad wheat, the sudden arrival of Newson in Casterbridge for the second time, the entirely unexpected appearance of the old furmity-seller in Casterbridge to drive the last nail in Henchard’s coffin, etc., are a few of the chance events that create the impression that Hardy believed in the operation of fatal forces hovering all around us and driving us to our doom. Chance or accident is thus an essential element in Hardy’s philosophy of life.
Love: A Potent Cause of Suffering
Love is another force which causes suffering in the world of Thomas Hardy. The women-folk, specially, are its chosen victims. As we are told in Tess, the cruel cause of things has hardened them with the powerful sex-instinct which they have never desired nor welcomed, and as a result of which they have to writh feverishly and pass sleepless nights. Love causes untold suffering to Elizabeth-Jane, to Tess, to Eustacia, to Bathsheba and to all other female characters of Hardy.
Human Freedom of Action: Its Limitations
Character may be destiny in Shakespeare, but it is certainly not so in Hardy’s world-view. In Hardy’s philosophy, character is responsible for suffering only to a limited extent. Inherited traits and inborn instincts determine the actions of a person to a very great extent. Even if he wishes, he cannot act against them. Moreover, Hardy agrees with Schopenheur in believing that, “a person can do what lie wills, but he cannot will what he wills.” Thus man is not a free agent and is not responsible for his actions to any great extent. He has only a very limited freedom of action.
Ways for the Amelioration of Human Lot
(1) Tact: But within these limits he can do much. If he is rash, hot-headed and obstinate, like Henchard, or Eustacia, he can bring about his own downfall. On the contrary, if he is wise and tactful, like Elizabeth Jane, or Thomasin, he can make much of his limited opportunities. Anyhow, it is his duty to adjust himself to his environment. He must not exult when fortune smiles upon him for at best it is only a short interlude, and may be followed by sudden and devastating misfortunes. And at such times, he must remember, like Elizabeth-Jane, that there are many others who have not got what they deserved or desired.
(2) The Rustic Philosophy of Resignation: Man must be resigned to his lot. It is useless to complain, for no complains can reform this ill-conceived scheme of things. It is equally futile to pit overselves against the inexorable, pitiless laws that govern our destiny, for if we do so we are sure to be pounded to atoms. We must learn the lesson of resignation, and we can do so only from primitive communities living in the lap of nature. The Wessex rustics when confronted with overwhelming misfortunes are never frustrated. They merely exclaim, ‘it was to be’, and go about the daily business of their life with renewed courage. Hardy is all admiration for such heroic souls, and prefers a simple life in their midst to an artificial life in a big city.
(3) Social Reform and Loving-Kindness: But this does not mean that in Hardy’s view man should make no attempts to ameliorate his lot. Hardy distinguishes between the natural and the social environment. While man can do nothing to change the natural environment, and must submit passively to it, he can do much to change his social environment through wise social reforms. Marriage laws, for example, should be liberalised in favour of the weaker sex. Unfortunate women, like Tess, who are more sinned against than sinning, should be accepted by society. No stigma should attach to them, for they are essentially pure. A spirit of “loving-kindness” should pervade all human relations and then all would be well. Life is suffering, but man should not increase its misery by this cruelty to his fellow-men, to women, and to the lower creatures.
☆Conclusion : Hardy’s Humanism
Such is Hardy’s philosophy of life. It is certainly a gloomy one, for he regards life as suffering and man as a puppet in the hands of Destiny. But it cannot be called pessimistic, for pessimism implies negation of life, a wish not to have been born at all. It is only in his last novel, Jude the Obscure, that some cynism enters and Hardy becomes pessimistic. Otherwise, Hardy is a humanist, a poet who wants man to turn from nature to his own kind, for,
“There at least discourse trills around,
There at least smiles abound,
There sametime are found,
Life-Loyalties.”


Thursday, 4 June 2020

TESS MORE SINNED AGAINST SINNING

Tess: More sinned against than sinning
Tess Of The DUrbervilles
MA / BS English
University of Sargodha


The main emphasis of the subject "Tess: More sinned against than sinning" is that the protagonist who is sinned against more than commits sin is ultimately the victim in the narrative. In Tess of the D’Urbervilles, Tess is usually judged on the purity of her intentions, and how much she was taken advantage of. A conservative reading from the era would seem to suggest that the fact that Tess lost her virtue would be enough to describe her as a ‘fallen woman’ “whose fornication, adultery and crime of murder marked her as outrageously ‘impure’ in conventional terms.”

Tess of The D'Urbervilles is one of the first ten greatest novels in the various languages of Europe. It is the masterpiece of Thomas Hardy. When Tess was first published it had an immediate success and it has remained a 'best-seller' ever since. It is an epic novel, for it is convened only with the life and tragic death of a country maid named Tess Durbeyfield. It is the best manifestation of Hardy's creative genius. It deals with Hardy's philosophy of realism. It illustrates Hardy's theory of will. Fate plays an important part in its scheme of things but we are aware of its working only when Hardy steps forward and begins to give his comment. This novel is the story of pure women who is loved by a man whom she hates and who deserted by a man whom she loves with her soul. Tess tragedy is a specimen syllogism in the cruel reasoning of universal fate. " Her tortured life, unnecessarily sensitive, is nothing but the symbolic language, wherein the premises of Fate are quietly and ruthlessly worked out."

Fate that haunts Tess, is cruel, merciless and relentless, " it swallows her up ultimately! " The story of Tess of the D'Urbervilles is deeply, insistently set in time and place. Tess is a pure woman, but she is not the manifestation of some Platonic conception of womanhood. She is a English country girl, the product of a particular place and time. Tess is a Durbeyfield, dairy produce, who lives in the second half of the nineteenth century in that part of southern England that Hardy called Wessex. The very word Wessex at once fictional and historical, tells us something of the nature of the author's creative imagination, so steeped in history and sense of place. The history and geography of southern England, are just a necessary background to Tess's story, they are integral to it, evening at every turn and level into the essence of the situation that Hardy describes. Tess's "fall", is integrally bound up with the social situation of the Durbeyfields. Tess represents an explicit attempt to replace a more marginal figure, the fallen woman as sign. She is an explicitly sexual being, her appearance described with the same directness as Graces feelings : " she had ..... a luxurious of aspect, a fullness of growth, which made her appear more of a woman than she really was."

The present novel bears witness to Hardy's power of creating women characters successfully and well. Tess is a sensitive passionate and earthly figure. There is in her a flowering of the flesh, a physical element which believes in the purity of her spirit and intensions. She is ruined to death while struggling against the gaunt of circumstances. Tess passes through a school of suffering and emerges a woman, almost divine and godly. Mr. and Mrs. Durbeyfield are her parents. They are created to show heredity moulds the character of a man or woman and how this character become his or her fate. She goes to Tantridge only when she is compelled by her mother. She does not like it but she realizes her responsibility and works as farm-keeper. Alec comes to take her from her home to Tantridge. On the way he kisser her against her will. After some days he pitilessly seduces her. After four month she returns home. In due course she gives birth to a baby named sorrow. This is her only sin. But she cannot be blame for it. She falls a helpless victim to her circumstances. She has nothing to do against the evil desighns of a reckless youth. But she has been an unwilling sinner. She hates Alec and rejects his offers again and again. She comes back to him only when she is convinced by hi, that Angel will not return. But as soon as Angel comes to her, she stabs Alec to death. The only sin she does is to accept Alec. But even here she is compelled by her circumstances. Her father has died. Alec has been helping her family and repeating his proposal. She writes to Angel again and again but gets no reply. If Angel came a little earlier she would never accepted Alec.

The most cruel treatment is meted out to her by Angel. She loves him and can sacrifice even her life for him. She writes a letter to him clearly stating her affair with Alec but unfortunately Angel does not get it. After they get married she tells him about it and begs pardon but Angel does not hear anything and reacts as a deaf ear and deserts her. Angel does a great injustice to her. He deserts her although her innocence. The punishment she gets is undeserved. Although she knows that Angel has passed a cruel sentence on her, she obeys him as a faithful wife. Tess remains loyal to him to the last moment. But she is made a plaything by Fate. The invisible hands of Fate draw her to her tragic en. When she is hanged , Hardy says, " Justice was done, and the President of the Immortals in Aschylean phrases, had ended his sport with Tess".

Odds are infinity to one against her chance of liking happily in this vale of tears. She knows well that she is washed down into the gulf of rain and death. Thus this masterpiece of Thomas Hardy brings the prose tragedy to a very high point to artistic perfection. From first to last, Tess of the D'Urbervilles is one relentless onward movement. The human narrative the surrounding nature, the accompaniment of intellectual and emotional significance, all weave inextricably together, and go forward dominated by a unity of purpose. They write in a single epic statement, formidable in its bare simplicity, of the conflict between Personal and Impersonal, the conflict, which is the inmost vitality of all Hardy's noblest work.


TESS A PURE WOMAN

Tess of the D'Urbervilles: Tess - A Pure Woman
MA English Annual System
University of Sargodha

Tess was a simple, innocent, guideless and hypersensitive girl, trapped in a traditionally bound society. She went to the D’Urbervilles to seek help for her starved family. There she met Alec who seduced her, ruining her life. She came back and narrated the whole story to her mother truly that both Alec and she were seduced. When her mother asked her to make the best of this, she refused. Later, she met Angel who jilted her on learning her of being unchaste. However, later, realizing his own mistake, he came back to her, but, she had started living with Alec as her mistress. The last important incident was Alec’s murder at the hand of Tess.

The critics accuse Tess of impurity on two accounts. Firstly, the seduction scene presupposes Tess’ implied consent. She never showed any sign of disapproval as she did when Alec first tried to kiss her. Secondly, being the wife of Angel and Alec’s being an improper person, Tess-like girl would never have surrendered to Alec, only to provide the family a living.

On the Victorian standard of purity, i.e. the loss of chastity is the loss of purity, Tess would certainly appear to be impious, because, firstly, she lost her chastity, and secondly, with her consent. But, to Hardy, it is the most faulty and narrow concept of morality. To him, chastity is of two types – chastity of the mind and of the body. Chastity of the body is related to virginity, whereas that of mind is the purity of the mind and soul. To Hardy, real chastity is the chastity of the mind and soul. One may be bodily unchaste; still he can be chaste, if he is chaste by his soul and mind. Those who have impure soul and mind are not ‘pure’ despite the chastity of their body. He, therefore, calls Tess pure for, in spite of losing bodily chastity she never lost purity of the soul.

Tess stands as a symbol of unflinching and pure love. She loved for the sake of love only without any consideration. She went on loving Angel inspite of his being unfaithful.

Tess had purity of dealings, and warm feelings for everyone without any personal gain. After losing her chastity, she never tried to deceive anyone. She told her mother and Angel truly about their seduction.

She was a symbol of self-sacrifice and emotional self-control. She never behaved hyper-sentimentally and always kept her passions under control of her intellect. She never raised hue and cry and never shed tears before anyone to get sympathies. She went on sacrificing herself for the sake of Angel, her family or anyone she came across. She virtually proposed to Angle to marry Eza, Heely or Marian for she considered herself inferior to anyone of them.

All this prove the purity of Tess’ soul and mind. Had she been impure, she could have narrated one-sided story to her mother that she was raped by Alec. She could have blamed her mother or her fate. Had she been impious, she could have killed ‘Sorrow’ at its birth to avoid disreputation, but she loved him and baptized him herself after the refusal of clergyman. Had she been immoral, she wouldn’t have resisted Angel’s love for a long time. But, she was a woman, having passion to be loved; so she yielded to Angel’s love, but she had throughout been trying to unveil her secret to Angel. She wrote him a letter, explaining the entire situation, but the letter was misplaced. She came to know this when their marriage had been solemnized. Due to his unchanged behaviour she was satisfied, that he has forgiven her. Yet she had no intention to deceive Angel. Had she been cheap minded and mean, she would have condemned Angel when he left for Brazil deserting her. But she accepted the situation for she knew she was equally responsible. There are many incidents crying at the top of their voice that Tess was a pure woman.

The charges leveled against Tess can be negated promptly. She didn’t have implied consent in the seduction, for seduction is a sort of intoxication. No one is willfully seduced. As Tess fell a victim to seduction, anyone would have been seduced under such romantic circumstances. She was too innocent to judge Alec’s intentions for it was her first contact with any man. Then Alec deliberately rode the horse so fast that throughout the way, she kept feeling the close and warm touches of Alec. When they reached the appointed place, she slept. The romantic atmosphere, darkness and the silence prevailing everywhere also contributed to make her seduced. So we can not blame her for having been seduced with her consent.

The second charge looks, rather, valid and undeniable. Still, before blaming Tess, we must consider the inevitable and bitter conditions, leading Tess to accept such a slur on her fair name. Tess had been suffering throughout her life till the saturation point arrived. She tried her best to contact Angel, but failed; she aimed to get some job, but in vain. Her family was at the edge of starvation after her father’s death and the serious ailment of her mother. Then Alec assured her that Angel wouldn’t return. So she ventured to live with Alec as his mistress. She did it under dire necessity, not for lust or any personal end. But she never accepted Alec from her heart. Alec’s murder proves this fact. It may be an error; yet it alone can never prove her unchaste. Keeping this last incident aside, she is undeniably pure. So pure and honest she was that she didn’t conceal from Angel the fact of her living with Alec as his mistress.

Tess was that perfectly a pure woman who accidentally lost her chastity and kept playing a toy in the hands of fate. Hardy remarks on the death of Tess that:
"Justice was done and the President of the Immortals, by Aeschelylian Phrase, had ended his sport with Tess."
This also reflects the innocence and purity of Tess, who, despite prodigious number of sufferings, never lost the purity of her mind and soul, and, therefore, was titled ‘A pure woman’ by Hardy.