Welcome to English Literature and Linguistics, Join Online Classes (Only For Ladies)

MA ENGLISH LITERATURE

Thursday, 31 October 2019

Joseph Andrews by HENRY FIELDING

Joseph Andrews as A Social Satire💐🌷🦋🍁🙋‍♀️👇🌿🌿🌿🌿🍁🍁🍁

       Henry Fielding is widely studied today as one of the chief begetters of the modernist movement in novel and as a master who embodied in realistic prose a panoramic survey of the contemporary society. With the novelty and vitality of the writings of Henry Fielding exerted a major influence on the succeeding writers and dominated the English fiction until the end of the 19th century.

         Fielding’s brilliant tour de force Joseph Andrews is an astounding encapsulation of the 18th century English social life and manners. It mirrors with rare force and realism, the blemishes of mankind in its true face. The novel, in its entirety, is an impassioned satire on the moral and social ills that beset the 18th century English society. In this novel we are confronted with a chameleonic society that frequently changes its appearance to gratify personal lusts of various kinds. The social life portrayed by Fielding is scrutinized in every facets of this society. The novel depicts human beings camouflaged in various shades of vanity, hypocrisy and narcissism. Here, Fielding essentially becomes a spokesman of his age and seeks to come out strongly against the affected behavior of the so-called respectable society of the day. The reader becomes a witness of characters who have a life of their own, but it is the essence of humanity, distilled through Fielding’s own vision. It is presented to us through the lines:

“I describe not men, but manners, not an individual, but species”.

          Fielding's exploration begins with his survey on the nature and temperament of women of his time. Women of all classes were snobbish and amorous to some extent . The sensuality of women is reflected at its best through the representatives like Lady Booby, Mrs. Slipslop and Betty. Lady Booby feels greatly attracted by Joseph’s manliness and personality and seeks in vain to evoke his sexual response to gratify her sensual appetite. Mrs. Slipslop also follows her mistress’ path and tries to win Joseph as a lover. Even Betty falls in love with Joseph and seeks in vain to have sexual gratification from him. All these amorous intentions show a fair picture of the amoral side of the 18th century women.

      The society that Fielding portrays in Joseph Andrews is extremely inhuman, callous, indifferent, uncharitable and narcissistic. The insensitive hardness of this society is clearly exposed in the stage-coach scene in which we find inhuman stubborness. When Postillion tells the Coachman that someone is groaning within a ditch, he bids the postillion to "Go on, Sirrah, we are confounded late”. Then there is a lady who reacts in a contemptible manner, when  Postillion relates Joseph’s nakedness : "O Jesus, a naked Man! Dear Coachman, drive on and leave him". Thus both the coachman and the lady decide to leave Joseph to his own lot, the coachman because he is behind schedule, and the lady because she cannot tolerate the idea of aiding a naked man. Seeing the gentlemen, Joseph appeals to them and details the circumstances of his situation, upon which an old gentleman cries: "Robbed! Let us make all the haste imaginable, or we shall be robbed too", showing again a similar willingness as the others have displayed to abandon Joseph. In addition, the other gentleman, who studies law, deems that they should not abandon Joseph at all, although for contemptible reasons. Although he agrees with the rest that "he wished they had past by without taking any notice",  his final conclusion is  that they would be held accountable for murder if Joseph died in that situation  and he therefore thought “it adviseable to save the poor creature's life, for their own sakes”. Although Joseph does require clothing to fight against the cold in his enfeebled state, both the lawyer and the older gentlemen do not condescend to vouchsafe any assistance. The coachman also declines, in spite of his  two large coats, because of  fears that  "they should be made bloody" At last, it is the postillion, "a lad who hath been since transported for robbing a hen-roost,  voluntarily strips off a great coat, his only garment" and swore that he would rather remain in a shirt than "suffer a fellow-creature to lie in so miserable a condition". Here Fielding shows the contrast between the attitude of the rich passengers and that of the poor Postillion. What sets him apart is not his class, but the fact that he alone dismisses his own comfort and he is the only person who considers Joseph a "fellow-creature" worthy of such rescue. Fielding emphatically declares: "High People" are "People of Fashion", but that they are not "higher in their Dimensions" nor in "their Characters" The incident gives ample scope to Fielding for satirizing the pretences and affectations of an essentially inhuman society.

        Fielding also provides some glimpses of the chaotic, greedy, opportunistic and insincere sides of the 18th century society. The chaotic side is exposed by the robbery incident. It is also revealed by the incident in which a villain attempts to rape Fanny. Human greed is exposed by the characters of the surgeons and the clergymen. The surgeon refused to treat Joseph because was unable to pay fees. The clergymen of the time were the most selfish and materialistic. Parson Barnabas and Parson Trulliber are the true embodiments of corrupt clergy. Then there is a squire who is fond of hunting hares, tries to satisfy his lustful desire for Fanny taking advantages of her poor condition. The insincerity of the society is also revealed by the depiction of the justices, who were as dishonest as the clergymen and the squires. Justice Frolick, for instance, goes out of his way to send Joseph and Fanny to prison, without any trial, only to satisfy a whim of Lady Booby.

       In brief, Joseph Andrews is a fine social document that represents an inclusive picture of the 18the century English society. The novel directs its satire not only against particular individuals but also against the follies and vices of the entire society.











Semuel Richardson’s Pamela (1740) is a famous example of an epistolary novel, or a novel composed of letters. Richardson was famous for this style of writing and used it in his other novels. Pamela differs from Richardson’s other novels in that the letters are mostly from the titular Pamela; whereas in his other novels, more points of view are included. The novel focuses on Pamela to hone in on her experience and state of mind.

Pamela is a fifteen-year-old maidservant in Bedfordshire. She is innocent and virtuous. She serves Lady B, who is kind to her. Unfortunately, Lady B has just passed away. Pamela is nervous about her work situation, as she does not come from money. Lady B’s son, Mr. B, promises to keep her and all the other servants employed.

Mr. B begins making advances towards Pamela. At first, they are just verbal, as she reports to her parents. She promises she will do everything to preserve her virtue. Her parents agree with her, but advise her if Mr. B ever makes physical advances towards her she should return home, despite their impoverishment. Soon thereafter, Mr. B makes a physical advancement towards Pamela, which she rebufs. He attempts to pay her to keep her quiet, but she refuses and tells her friend the housekeeper, Mrs. Jervis.

Mr. B continues to make advances towards Pamela, including trying to kiss her while she undresses for the evening after hiding in her closet. She faints, which dissuades Mr. B from continuing. Pamela threatens to return home to her parents. Mr. B is against this and thwarts her return.

He offers Pamela more money, then marriage to a Lincolnshire clergyman named Mr. Williams. She refuses and packs her bags to return home. Mr. B tricks Pamela and sends her to his estate in Lincolnshire. He also writes her parents telling them he has sent her away to preserve her virtue, as she has had an affair with a penurious clergyman. Pamela’s father does not believe him and attempts to retrieve her at the Bedfordshire estate, but she is not there.

Pamela begins a journal in Lincolnshire, hoping one day her parents will read it and understand. She is virtually a captive there, under the watch of Mrs. Jewkes, the spiteful housekeeper. Mr. B writes to Pamela and invites her to be his mistress. She refuses. Pamela begins to plan her escape and enlists the help of Mr. Williams. They exchange letters leaving them next to the sunflower in the garden. Mr. Williams tries his best to help her, even asking the local gentry for assistance. They refuse due to Mr. B’s social standing, advising Mr. Williams to marry Pamela.

Mr. Williams asks Pamela to marry him to help her escape, but she refuses. Pamela is concerned when Mr. Williams is robbed, wondering if Mr. B set the robbery up to steal her letters. She is determined to escape but gives up on this idea when she is hurt during her attempt.

Mr. B soon arrives at Lincolnshire. He again asks Pamela to be his mistress and she refuses. Mr. B and Mr. Jewkes come up with a plan for Mr. B to finally seduce Pamela. He dresses up as a female servant named Nan and pretends to be drunk. As Nan, he sneaks into Pamela’s bed. When Pamela realizes what is happening, she has a violent fit, similar to a seizure.

After Pamela’s fit, Mr. B’s demeanor changes. He seems regretful in his actions, but continues to pursue her, albeit without force. Pamela begs him to stop his advances. He admits that he loves Pamela, but feels he is unable to marry her due to the social gap. Pamela is shocked, but somewhat stirred by his confession. She hopes he means what he says. Mr. B leaves his estate for a few days. While he is gone, Pamela is stopped by a fortuneteller who says Mr. B is trying to force her into a sham marriage. She rethinks her burgeoning affection for Mr. B.

When Mr. B returns, Mrs. Jewkes gives him some of Pamela’s recent writings. After reading them, his affection for Pamela only grows. He feels guilty for the way he has treated her and promises to make things right by marrying her. Pamela is still suspicious of him and denies him, asking to return home. Mr. B is upset and angry, but allows Pamela to go home. Pamela feels strangely sad.

On her way home, she receives a letter from Mr. B, imploring her to return and marry him. He speaks of reform and changing his ways, and Pamela, believing him, decides to return. On her return, they wonder how the gentry will react to their marriage, and Pamela tells Mr. B why she was wary of his proposal. He admits he thought of luring her into a sham marriage, but changed his mind.

The gentry accept Pamela easily, due to her charm. Her father comes looking for her, worried that she is now a mistress, but is happy and excited to see her engaged and content. Mr. B and Pamela are soon married. Pamela then has a hostile interaction with Mr. B’s sister, Lady Davers where she effectively holds Pamela hostage, disparaging her social status. Lady Davers forces Mr. B to confess to a dalliance he had as a young man. Pamela learns there was a child produced from this dalliance named Miss Goodwin. He introduces Pamela to Miss Goodwin, who believes Mr. B is her uncle. Miss Goodwin’s mother is happily married in Jamaica.

Mr. B sets up Pamela’s parents to look after Mr. B’s estate in Kent. Lady Davers ultimately accepts Pamela. Pamela has many children with Mr. B and visits with her family often. She is happy and takes Miss Goodwin under her wing, ensuring that she becomes as pious as Pamela.





JOSEPH ANDREWS SYMBOLISM, IMAGERY, ALLEGORY

#_The_Broken_Piece_of_Gold
Who'da thunk Joseph would be so interested in a piece of gold? What's gold to this goody-two-shoes, right?Yeah, well, this particular piece of gold is a special symbol that reminds Joseph of Fanny....

#The_Strawberry_Shaped_Birthmark
Joseph has a particularly pretty birthmark on his chest. Now, it's not like he goes around flashing that birthmark to everyone, but still, all of Joseph's buddies know that this birthmark separates...
#Pamela_Andrews
Okay, you knew this was coming. We can't overstate the importance of Miss Pamela Andrews to Fielding's work in general—and to Joseph Andrews in particular. We'd even say that she's less of a char...

#The_History_of_Leonora
The story Leonora inserted is inserted seemingly randomly in the middle of Joseph Andrews, right after Joseph and Adams split up to travel. The only connection this story has to the book's plot is...

#Symbolism_Imagery_Allegory
Who'da thunk Joseph would be so interested in a piece of gold? What's gold to this goody-two-shoes, right?
Yeah, well, this particular piece of gold is a special symbol that reminds Joseph of Fanny. When he's robbed on the road, he begs people to "search for a little piece of broken gold, which had a ribband tied to it, and which he could swear to amongst all the hoards of the richest men in the universe".
Later on, the folks at the inn try to confiscate the piece of gold to use as evidence against the robbers who left Joseph in a ditch. Great, right? Not right: we find Joseph practically in tears as he tries to prevent his piece of gold from disappearing in a lengthy trial. More than revenge or justice, Joseph values his relationship with Fanny. If he let this piece of gold vanish into the ether, his value system would be totally out of whack.
In a nutshell, Joseph is keen on recovering the piece of gold because it represents Fanny and his love for her. Joseph doesn't care how much the gold is worth in monetary terms; it's only meaningful to him as a reminder of Fanny. On top of that, Joseph is struggling to keep his virtue intact. He tells us he's resisting temptation so that he can save himself Fanny, so it makes sense that he needs a little reminder now and again.

Joseph has a particularly pretty birthmark on his chest. Now, it's not like he goes around flashing that birthmark to everyone, but still, all of Joseph's buddies know that this birthmark separates Joseph from the pack. Little do they know that it's also the thing that shows his true parentage—yep, it turns out that Joseph is a gentleman, through and through. As Mr. Wilson's son and heir, he's got plenty of wealth coming to him.
Joseph is a handsome guy, but he's by no means perfect. Fielding takes great pains to show how Joseph is always in the middle. He's middle-class, middling height, and not particularly smart about navigating the world. Joseph's flaws help him, though. The strawberry-shaped birthmark is the perfect example of a flaw that changes Joseph's life for the better, due to how recognizable it is.
Take a look at what the peddler says about Joseph and his birthmark, for example. After all, it's the savvy peddler who brings the birthmark to everyone's attention. He asks Gammar Andrews if her supposed kid has a birthmark, and she answers: "Yes, he had as fine a strawberry as ever grew in a garden". By implying that Joseph's strawberry birthmark is natural, Gammar Andrews suggests that he's pretty awesome, flaws and all.
See, even if Joseph isn't at the top of his game, his birthmark shows that he's a natural gentleman. We're thinking that Fielding is making a joke about how virte can't overstate the importance of Miss Pamela Andrews to Fielding's work in general—and to Joseph Andrews in particular. We'd even say that she's less of a character and more of a symbol in this book. Joseph breaks it down for us: "I don't doubt, dear sister, but you will have the grace to preserve your virtue against all trials, and I beg you earnestly to pray, I may be enabled to preserve mine hold up. What's he talking about? Obviously, Joseph is trying to withstand the temptation to give up his virtue. But he's also talking about Pamela's trials to hold off her master, Mr. B. This battle of wills is the whole plot of Pamela , Samuel Richardson's masterpiece (or master-stinker, if you agree with Fielding).
The ghost of Pamela haunts all of Joseph Andrews. Joseph is constantly in his sister's shadow, trying to measure up to her unattainable level of perfection. Although we don't actually meet Pamela, the character, until the very end of the book, Joseph hopes
Isn't this all a little bit much? Surely, no one thinks about their bratty sibling that much. Still, we're talking about Pamela Andrews , the single biggest sensation to hit eighteenth-century literature. Even better, Fielding has a hay day making fun of the secret of the book's success. Despite Pamela's will to resist sex, people read the book because it was sexy.
On top of that, by switching the sex of the main character from a female (Pamela) to a male (Joseph), Fielding is sending up Richardson's whole premise. At least in the eighteenth century, it would have been a lot more absurd for a handsome young buck to be holding off a bunch of lusty ladies than for a virtuous maiden to be holding off a lecherous old man. Fielding is making fun of the whole double standard.

[SHORT ANSWERS 

JOSEPH ANDREWS BY HENRY FIELDING

QUESTION NO. 1

Answer the following questions. 

(i) What is a novel?

Ans. A novel is a long narrative, normally in prose, which describes fictional characters and events, usually in the form of a sequential story. "Pride and Prejudice" by Jane Austen and "A Tale of Two Cities" by Charles Dickens are famous English novels.

(ii) What is Fielding's concept of novel?

Ans. In his preface to "Joseph Andrews", Fielding claims that novel is a genre of writing "which I do not remember to have been hitherto attempted in our language". He defined it as the "comic epic-poem in prose": a work of prose fiction, epic in length and variety of incident and character, in the hypothetical spirit of Homer's lost comic poem Margites.

(iii) Write the names of four novels of Fielding.

Ans. Joseph Andrews (1742), Jonathan Wild (1748), Tom Jones (1749) and Amelia (1751) are the famous novels of Henry Fielding.

(iv) What factors influenced Fielding in his conception and composition of 'Joseph Andrews'?

Ans. Fielding's first venture into prose fiction came a year previously with the publication in pamphlet form of Shamela, a travesty of, and direct response to, the stylistic failing and moral hypocrisy that Fielding saw in Richardson's Pamela. The impetus of the novel, as Fielding claims in his preface, is the establishment of a genre of writing "which I do not remember to have been hitherto attempted in our language".  

(v) What is the purpose of the Author's Preface in 'Joseph Andrews'?

Ans. The purpose of Fielding's preface in "Joseph Andrews" is to define and defend his chosen genre, "comic-epic poem in prose". He is particularly concerned to differentiate the comic epic, and comedy generally, from burlesque. He also defends the various vices inserted in the novel.

(vi) How is the novel 'Joseph Andrews' related to 'Pamela'?

Ans. Fielding wrote "Shamela" as a satirical response to Richardson's "Pamela", and his longer and more serious "Joseph Andrews" likewise draws on Richardson's novel for an equivocal sort of inspiration. While "Shamela" is a straightforward travesty of "Pamlea", "Joseph Andrews" is something more complex, and its relation to "Pamela" is something other than the relation of parody to original. 

(vii) Define digression.

Ans. A digression is a stylistic device authors employ to create a temporary departure from the main subject of the narrative to focus on apparently unrelated topics, explaining background details. However, after this temporary shift, authors return to the main topic at the end of the narrative. There are several famous digressions in Homer, such as the "wall scene" in Book 3 of the "Iliad".

(viii) What is the purpose of digression in 'Joseph Andrews'?

Ans. It is perhaps a development of Fielding's verbose writing style that he includes so many digressions in "Joseph Andrews". There are three main interpolated tales in the novel. In regards to these interpolated tales, Fielding employs a variety of tactics to make the stories more believable. These inserted stories also illustrate other tensions related to writing a novel, such as control and interruption. 

(ix) Define the narrator?

Ans. A narrator is the voice that an author takes on to tell a story. This voice can have a personality quite different from the author's. For example, in his story "The Tell-Tale Heart", Edgar Allan Poe makes his narrator a raving lunatic.

(x) Define burlesque.

Ans. Burlesque is a literary, dramatic or musical work intended to cause laughter by caricaturing the manner or spirit of serious works, or by ludicrous treatment of the subjects. Contrasting examples of literary burlesque are Alexander Pope's "The Rape of the Lock" and Samuel Butler's "Hudibras". W.S. Gilbert's "Robert the Devil" is an example of theatrical burlesque.

(xi) What is bildungsroman?

Ans. Bildungsroman is a special kind of novel that focuses on the psychological and moral growth of its main character from his or her youth to adulthood. "Tom Jones" by Henry Fielding and "David Copperfield" by Charles Dickens are examples of bildungsroman.

(xii) What is important about the plot of the novel 'Joseph Andrews'?

Ans. "Joseph Andrews" is a picaresque novel in structure, for its plot-line is similar to the one-line structure of picaresque fiction. The plot of the novel progresses by "shutting', moving forward by "small oscillations of emotion", which, in the larger, all-over design, are small parts of a unified whole, episodic in nature. At times, events seem like reversals, followed by forward movement. 

(xiii) What are the major themes of 'Joseph Andrews'?

Ans. The vulnerability and power of goodness, charity and religion, town and country, class and birth, reality verses appearance, providence, affection, vanity, hypocrisy, and chastity are the major themes of "Joseph Andrews".

(xiv) According to Fielding, what are the proper roles of clergy?

Ans. One role of the clergy would be charity, clearly evident in the character of Parson Adams. Adams also illustrates the clergy's role in instructing the members of their parish, as well as demonstrating and modeling Christian morals and propriety. Adam's character is the epitome of honesty.

(xv) What is the significance of the letter from Joseph to his sister?

Ans. Joseph's letter to his sister Pamela is significant because it illustrates his innocence. He thinks that Lady Booby is perhaps pursuing him, but charitably ascribes this to distraction over the death of Sir Thomas. In any case, he anticipates his dismissal and advises Pamela of his return to the Booby country-seat.

Tuesday, 29 October 2019

Sociolinguistics

Sociolinguistics🌸💐🎉👇

A dialect is a variety of language that is systematically different from other varieties of the same language. The dialects of a single language are mutually intelligible, but when the speakers can no longer understand each other, the dialects become languages. Geographical regions are also considered when dialects become languages. Swedish, Norwegian, and Danish are all considered separate languages because of regular differences in grammar and the countries in which they are spoken, yet Swedes, Norwegians, and Danes can all understand one another. Hindi and Urdu are considered mutually intelligible languages when spoken, yet the writing systems are different. On the other hand, Mandarin and Cantonese are mutually unintelligible languages when spoken, yet the writing systems are the same.

A dialect is considered standard if it is used by the upper class, political leaders, in literature and is taught in schools as the correct form of the language. Overt prestige refers to this dominant dialect. A non-standard dialect is associated with covert prestige and is an ethnic or regional dialect of a language. These non-standard dialects are just as linguistically sophisticated as the standard dialect, and judgments to the inferiority of them are based on social or racist judgments.

African-American English contains many regular differences of the standard dialect. These differences are the same as the differences among many of the world's dialects. Phonological differences include r and l deletion of words like poor (pa) and all (awe.) Consonant cluster simplification also occurs (passed pronounced like pass), as well as a loss of interdental fricatives. Syntactic differences include the double negative and the loss of and habitual use of the verb "be." He late means he is late now, but he be late means he is always late.

A lingua franca is a major language used in an area where speakers of more than one language live that permits communication and commerce among them. English is called the lingua franca of the whole world, while French used to be the lingua franca of diplomacy.

A pidgin is a rudimentary language of few lexical items and less complex grammatical rules based on another language. No one learns a pidgin as a native language, but children do learn creoles as a first language. Creoles are defined as pidgins that are adopted by a community as its native tongue.

Besides dialects, speakers may use different styles or registers (such as contractions) depending on the context. Slang may also be used in speech, but is not often used in formal situations or writing. Jargon refers to the unique vocabulary pertaining to a certain area, such as computers or medicine. Words or expressions referring to certain acts that are forbidden or frowned upon are considered taboo. These taboo words produce euphemisms, words or phrases that replace the expressions that are being avoided.

The use of words may indicate a society's attitude toward sex, bodily functions or religious beliefs, and they may also reflect racism or sexism in a society. Language itself is not racist or sexist, but the society may be. Such insulting words may reinforce biased views, and changes in society may be reflected in the changes in language.

SHAKESPEARE

" SHAKESPEARE"

The greatest of all Elizabethan dramatist  was Shakespeare.

According to Pope,
                                   Shakespeare was not an imitator but an instrument of nature. He did not speak for nature, rather it was nature who spoke through him."
Due to the great achievements of Shakespeare 16th century is known as the age of Shakespeare.
                         Shakespeare"A philosopher:

Shakespeare is know as the master of human psychology. It is his universal huminty,his well embrassing understanding of every human emotion and instinct, which made Shakespeare what he is the greatest philosopher of human heart ever known.
    
Shakespeare:- An Universal writer:
                      Shakespeare was not only the greatest figure of Elizabethan age but is still the source of inspiration and ideal of new generation.
                  According to Ben Johnson:
"Shakespeare was not of an age but of all time"
Hence we can say that he was not of a land but of all lands.
                  Shakespearean Comedy:
It was Shakespeare in whose hands the romantic comedies reached its climax.
Shakespeare's romantic comedies are all conceived in an imaginative setting far away from the dull and dreary world of everyday life.
In Shakespeare's comedies the major characters are heroines. It is understandable why Shakespeare in his comedies should give much importance ,know that these comedies are comedies of love ,and love for a man is just a part of his life and life's activity but for a women it is her whole life and its activity.
 
Comedies: The Merchant of Venice, Twelfth Night, much Ado about Nothing, Midsummer Night's Dream, 1st comedy " love's labour Lost"

Shakespearean Tragedy:
                                            Shakespeare wrote a number of tragedies the greatest among them are Macbeth, Othelo, king Lear and Hamlet.
A tragedy always end in suffering and death for otherwise it will not be tragedy.
Shakespeare's tragedy depicts always the suffering and death of the hero. If a play does not end in the death of hero, is not,in the Shakespearean sense a tragedy at all.
Shakespeare tragedies in the end hero's under stress appears shaken capacity for suffering.
Hamlet by his mental torture is virtually laid on the rock, Othelo experiences a tempest in his very soul.Lear turns mad, Macbeth loses all interest and is obliged to characterise it as .
"A tale told by an idiot ,full of sound and fury signifying nothing"
It means that he is more concerned with the darker side of human experiences and its destructive passions.
                                    Tragedies:
Caleopatra and Antony, Macbeth , king Lear, Othelo , Hamlet, Julius Ceaser etc.

Shakespeare's History plays"   
         
Shakespeare history plays are the product as well as the expression of intense feeling of patriotism.All of Shakespeare's history or Chronicle plays were written in the patriotic, feeling were as the higher pitch.
The major aim of Shakespeare's history plays was to make Englishmen proud of being Englishmen.
Shakespeare wrote some plays dealing with the history of England, Roughly speaking they cover three hundred and fifty years from 1200-1550. Richard 111(3), Richard 2(11),John king, Henry V111, three parts of Henry v1/ the two parts of Henry 1V, Henry V. First tragedy Richard 111 And youthful tragedy- Romeo and Juliet.
Shakwdoeare: the father of English language, who composed 154 sonnets and 38 plays..

Monday, 28 October 2019

Long Day's Journey Into Night

Long Day's Journey Into Night

Themes

The Past, as refuge and burden
The Past, along with forgiveness, is one of two dominant themes in the play. At different parts, the Past plays different roles. On one hand the past is a burden. Mary speaks with a terrible fatalism, claiming that nothing they are can be helped: past sins and mistakes have fixed their present and future irrevocably. The past also takes the form of old hurts that have gone unforgiven. We hear the same arguments again and again in this play, as the Tyrone's dredge up the same old grievances. Letting go is impossible, and so the Tyrones are stuck.

The past also becomes a refuge, but not in a positive way. Mary uses an idealized recreation of her girlhood as escapist fantasy. As she sinks further and further into the fog of morphine, she relives her childhood at the Catholic girls' school. The past is used to escape dealing with the present.

Forgiveness
Forgiveness is the other pivotal theme of the play. Although old pains cannot be forgotten and the Tyrones are, in a way, a doomed family, Edmund is able to make peace with his past and move on to what we know will be a brilliant career. His ability to do so is based in part on his capacity for forgiveness and understanding. The four Tyrones are deeply, disturbingly human. They have their jealousies and hatreds; they also remain a family, with all the normal bonds of love, however troubled, that being a family entails. Unlike his brother, Edmund is able to forgive and understand all of the Tyrones, including himself.

Breakdown of communication
Breakdown of communication is a very apparent theme. We are forced to listen to the same arguments again and again because nothing ever gets resolved. The Tyrones fight, but often hide the most important feelings. There is a deep tendency towards denial in the family. Edmund tries to deny that his mother has returned to morphine. Mary denies Edmund's consumption. Often, avoidance is the strategy for dealing with problems.

Religion
Although Tyrone professes to keep his faith, his two sons have long since abandoned the Catholic religion. Tyrone's religion spills over into his taste in art. He considers Edmund's favorite writers to be morbid and degenerate. Mary's loss of faith also recurs as an issue. Although she still believes, she thinks she has fallen so far from God that she no longer has the right to pray.

Drug and alcohol abuse
Mary's morphine addiction is balanced by the men's alcoholism. Although the morphine is perhaps a more destructive drug, alcohol does its fair share of damage to the Tyrone men. It is Tyrone's great vice, and it has contributed to Mary's unhappiness. Drunkenness has been Jamie's response to life, and it is part of why he has failed so miserably. And Edmund's alcohol use has probably contributed to ruining his health.

Isolation
Although the four Tyrones live under the same roof this summer, there is a deep sense of isolation. Family meals, a central activity of family bonding, are absent from the play. Lunch happens between acts, and dinner falls apart as everyone in the family goes his separate way. Mary's isolation is particularly acute. She is isolated by her gender, as the only woman of the family, and by her morphine addiction, which pushes her farther and farther from reality.

A day dream explanation!

A day dream explanation!

In the 1st stanza the speaker is in a wedding sitting alone out in the open, and feeling sad about the bride because she knows that the bride’s life will be miserable.
From her mother’s heart seemed loath to part
That queen of bridal charms,
But her father smiled on the fairest child
He ever held in his arms. 
 In the 2nd stanza the speaker is describing how her mother felt when she saw her daughter as this charming beautiful queen, And her father is smiling to his perfect daughter even though he never held her in his arms when she was child, but now he is happy because he is benefiting  from this marriage . It was really strange to have such unpleasant thoughts in a happy ceremony because the poem was set up in a wedding of a young Victorian woman.  Among other people the speaker stood outdoors a wedding looking at a young girl getting married. Everyone looked happy and celebrating the cheerful occasion expect for the narrator.
On the other hand her insensitive father had a wicked smile on his face because he was happy to marry off his little girl who “ever held in his arms”. Actually the Victorian  women were expected to be married at an early age and  “marriage was a social duty, because it obliged the family and helped to widen social contacts” (Beckett 103).
The trees did wave their plumy crests,
The glad birds caroled clear;
And I, of all the wedding guests,
Was only sullen there!
In the 3rd stanza the speaker is describing the trees and how it looks beautiful, and the birds are singing and happy, but the speaker between all the guests is not feeling happy. The whole setting was very pleasant and joyful because everything was beautiful, the spring was cool, the trees were green and the birds were singing.
There was not one, but wished to shun
 My aspect void of cheer;
The very gray rocks, looking on,
 Asked, “What do you here?”
 And I could utter no reply;
 In sooth, I did not know
Why I had brought a clouded eye
 To greet the general glow
In the 4th and the 5th stanza the speaker is setting alone , staying away from the wedding, and the  rocks are asking what are you doing here ? But the speaker couldn’t answer these rocks, the speaker didn’t know why. The speaker couldn’t understand why she was not celebrating like others even though the whole atmosphere seemed joyful. In order to answer that, the speaker took herself “into a reverie". Everything around her suggested that nothing will remain the same.
We thought, “When winter comes again,
 Where will these bright things be?
All vanished, like a vision vain,
 An unreal mockery!
“The birds that now so blithely sing,
Through deserts, frozen dry,
Poor spectres of the perished spring,
In famished troops will fly.
 In the 6th and the 7th stanza the speaker is sitting on the bank, and kept his heart to him, then sadly sank into “the river”. Then the speaker is wondering when the winter comes, where all these joyful thing will disappear, the green trees and the singing birds, here the speaker means this marriage, after a while all these joyful and cheer and happiness will disappear. Soon enough summer will become autumn and then winter which will make the "green leaves” fall and the birds fly away because of hunger and cold.
 “And why should we be glad at all?
The leaf is hardly green,
 Before a token of its fall
Is on the surface seen!
” Now, whether it were really so,
 I never could be sure;
 But as in fit of peevish woe,
 I stretched me on the moor,
 In the 8th and the 9th  stanza the speaker is saying that the happy birds now will be frozen and hungry in the  deserts  when the winter  comes, and why should be happy at all when the leaf is hardly green and in the end it will fall down .
What is a Day Dream ?
A daydream is a visionary fantasy especially one of happy, pleasant thoughts, hopes or ambitions, imagined as coming to pass, and experienced while awake. There are many different types of daydreams, and there is no consistent definition amongst psychological. The general public also uses the term for a broad variety of experiences. Research by Harvard psychologist Deirdre Barrett has found that people who experience vivid dream-like mental images reserve the word for these, whereas many other people refer to milder imagery, realistic future planning, review of past memories or just “spacing out”–i.e. one’s mind going relatively blank—when they talk about “daydreaming.
While daydreaming has long been derided as a lazy, non-productive pastime, it is now commonly acknowledged that daydreaming can be constructive in some contexts. There are numerous examples of people in creative or artistic careers, such a composers, novelists and Filmmaker , developing new ideas through daydreaming. Similarly, research scientists, mathematicians and physicists have developed new ideas by daydreaming about their subject areas.
Classification
The poem is composed of eighteen stanzas, containing four lines each. Even to the trained eye, it doesn’t follow a set pattern. This would qualify as a free verse poem. Free verse, in terms of poetry, is defined as: Free Verse (vers libre): poetry written in either rhymed or unrhymed lines that have no set fixed metrical pattern. This applies to the poem because the poet chose not to follow the limitations of any existing style (ie. sonnet), and instead pursued her own means of style.
Pastoral: A poem that depicts rural and natural life in a peaceful, romanticized way. This applies to this poem because nature is very much romanticized; it is centered on the idea of a marriage of two seasons (spring, and summer).
Meter and Rhyme Scheme
Meter
Because the poem is free verse, in which there is no set fixed metrical pattern, there is no obvious metrical device by which to measure this poem.
Rhyme scheme
The trees did wave their plumy crests,
The glad birds caroled clear;
And I, of all the wedding guests,
Was only sullen there!
There was not one, but wished to shun
My aspect void of cheer;
The very grey rocks, looking on,
Asked, "What do you do here?”
The rhyme scheme to which this poem pertains is fairly straightforward: ABAB, ABAB, ABAB, and so on.
Theme of Nature
 Nature is the central theme of this poem. The author uses this theme to express their attachment to nature, and more specifically, the spring and summer months. This can be seen in the stanza: 
“We thought, "When winter comes again,
Where will these bright things be?”
All vanished, like a vision vain,
An unreal mockery!“
Theme of Romance
The author attaches romance to nature, in the way that she compares the transition from spring to summer as a marriage. For example:
"On a sunny brae, alone I lay
One summer afternoon; 
It was the marriage-time of May
With her young lover, June.”
Symbolism
The major symbol in this poem is the “marriage” of spring and summer. This specifically refers to the transition from May to June. This idea is presented based on the themes of nature and romance. The two are often presented in one poem because nature is viewed as a very romantic thing. Another symbol is winter to death, and spring and summer to life. Winter, obviously, kills off nature. Grass doesn’t grow, birds migrate, and trees lose their leaves. Winter is grey, as the poem notes. Spring and summer, however, account for the life of nature, when birds sing and trees bloom.
Irony
What is an irony? 
It is said that an irony is the use of words that express the opposite of their literal meaning; a statement or a situation where the meaning is contradicted by the appearance or presentation of the idea.
 What are the kinds of irony?
There are many types of ironies yet these are the major three kinds of irony which are commonly recognized. First, verbal irony, which is the intended meaning of a statement, differs from the meaning that the words appear to express. Second, the dramatic irony, in which the audiences know more about present or future circumstances then a character in a story. Finely, the situational irony, involves a clash between what is expected or intended and what actually occurs.
In the poem “Day Dream,” we can assume that there is a verbal irony in the seventh stanza., 
“We thought,
"when winter comes again,
where will these bright things be?
All vanished, like a vision vain,
An unreal mockery!“
Here the persona seems to be attending a wedding which is believed to be a joyful event, still, the speaker is gloomy here for the reason that it is as if the bride was some kind of product to be bought and take advantage of her. And this is why the speaker is not celebrating the marriage so through the use of irony the speaker shows the devastation of the girl. 
Therefore, in these lines there is an irony, as the speaker questions about the bright things in nature and where will they go when the winter comes? And replies that they will probably all vanish as if there were not real at all ” like a vision vain”. This is connected with how the Victorians reflection of the cycle of the seasons, they are connected to the cycle of human life, they are both short-termed.  This is reflected on the happy occasion, it is temporary and in time, it will change, thus, the wedding is a mockery because it is the end of this Victorian bride’s life.

Explanation of _To Imagination_ by Bronte.

Explanation of _To Imagination_ by Bronte.

I rediscovered the poem ‘To Imagination’ while reflecting on inner resources in existential situations. What could be the source of consolation or even joyful thoughts? The poem outlines a strategy of coping with a difficult life, with pain and hopelessness. 

For its author, Emily Brontë, pain must have been a constant companion from early childhood. When she was 3 years old, her mother died. A few years later her older sisters, who had partly filled the gap left by her mother, followed her. Their brother, who was unable to live up to his father´s expectations, turned into an alcoholic and died in his early 30s. His escapades must have been a nagging worry to his family. Emily herself was in frail health. She fell ill and died at the age of 30. 

With Emily Brontë´s biographical experience in mind I find the poem´s line of reasoning remarkable. Of course, I do not intend to suggest that it is expressive of a purely personal and individual experience. In fact, the author relied heavily on literary conventions. With the apostrophe ‘Oh, my true friend!’ imagination is personified and the allegorical mode initiated.[1] The final three lines of the first stanza can be seen as an invocation of a muse.[2] The poem´s line of reasoning is a variation of the Renaissance topos of the corruption of the world and the vanity of human effort with the only true value lying in the soul and real life located in the afterworld. In the course of the poem ‘Imagination’, ‘Reason’, ‘Truth’, ‘Fancy’, ‘Nature’ and ‘Liberty’ appear as allegorical figures, and Reason and Truth compete with Imagination for dominance of the soul. Their dispute is narrated as a part of the speaker´s praise of Imagination which is reminiscent of an ode. All these elements of composition underline the literary origin and character of the speaker´s argumentation.

Nevertheless, the first and final stanzas seem to root the speaker´s reflections firmly in personal experience. The point of departure is the speaker´s exhaustion at the end of a long day, which Emily undoubtedly knew as she was in charge of managing the household in the parsonage at Haworth, especially during her sister Charlotte´s absence. It is skilfully entwined with the invocation of Imagination as her muse. 

In stanzas 2-5 the author juxtaposes the negative experience of the outer world and an inner world whose beauty is visualised with the help of nature imagery. The speaker-I, Imagination and Liberty are the forces that shape it. Although the speaker´s reflections are based on the topos of the vanity of human effort, the inner world lacks a religious dimension. It is merely hinted at in the 5th stanza with ‘a lovelier Life from Death’ and only the voice of Imagination is given the attribute ‘divine’. It can be concluded that the speaker who is certainly in part an impersonation of the author, does not turn to religion for help but relies on Imagination, which in her allegorical form appears as an outside force, but is actually projection of a power dwelling inside her, a power (she conceives as) endowed with divine qualities.[3]

 

When the speaker distances herself from her previous enthusiasm in first line of the 6th stanza the poem returns to the level of personal experience. She is aware that although imagination can give consolation by displacing the bleaker vision which surfaces when ‘Reason’ and ‘Truth’ predominate, it is ultimately a delusion. To me this move conjures up an individual with a strong sense of reality who faces her fate with a great deal of courage. The conversational tone with which she addresses Imagination as a friend in stanzas 1 and 6 at eye level confirms this impression.

Sunday, 27 October 2019

Words and word-formation processes

Words and word-formation processes

People in general have no difficulty coping the new words. We can very quickly understand a new word in our language (a neologism) and accept the use of different forms of that new word. This ability must derive in part from the fact that there is a lot of regularity in the word-formation process in our language.

In some aspects the study of the processes whereby new words come into being language like English seems relatively straightforward. This apparent simplicity however masks a number of controversial issues. Despite the disagreement of scholars in the area, there don´t seem to be a regular process involved.

These processes have been at work in the language for some time and many words in daily use today were, at one time, considered barbaric misuses of the language.

What is Coinage?
Coinage is a common process of word-formation in English and it is the invention of totally new terms. The most typical sources are invented trade names for one company´s product which become general terms (without initial capital letters) for any version of that product.

For example: aspirin, nylon, zipper and the more recent examples kleenex, teflon.

This words tend to become everyday words in our language.

What is Borrowing?
Borrowing is one of the most common sources of getting new words in English. That is the taking over of words from other languages. Throughout history the English language has adopted a vast number of loan words from other languages. For example:

Alcohol (Arabic)
Boss (Dutch)
Croissant (French)
Piano (Italian)
Pretzel (German)
Robot (Czech)
Zebra (Bantu)
Etc…

A special type of borrowing is the loan translation or calque. In this process, there is a direct translation of the elements of a word into the borrowing language. For example: Superman, Loan Translation of Ãœbermensch, German.

What is Compounding?
The combining process of words is technically known as compounding, which is very common in English and German. Obvious English examples would be:

Bookcase
Fingerprint
Sunburn
Wallpaper
Textbook
Wastebasket
Waterbed
What is Blending?
The combining separate forms to produce a single new term, is also present in the process of blending. Blending, takes only the beginning of one word and joining it to the end of the other word.  For instance, if you wish to refer to the combined effects of smoke and fog, there´s the term smog. The recent phenomenon of fund rising on television that feels like a marathon, is typically called a telethon, and if you´re extremely crazy about video, you may be called a videot.

What is Clipping?
Clipping is the process in which the element of reduction which is noticeable in blending is even more apparent. This occurs when a word of more than one syllable is reduced to a shorter form, often in casual speech. For example, the term gasoline is still in use but the term gas, the clipped form is used more frequently. Examples

Chem.
Gym
Math
Prof
Typo
What is Backformation?
Backformation is a very specialized type of reduction process. Typically a word of one type, usually noun, is reduced to form another word of a different type, usually verb. A good example of backformation is the process whereby the noun television first came into ude and then the term televise is created form it.

More examples:

Donation – Donate
Option – Opt
Emotion – Emote
Enthusiasm – Enthuse
Babysit – Babysitter
What is Conversion?
Conversion is a change in the function of a word, as for example, when a noun comes to be used as a verb without any reduction. Other labels of this very common process are “category change” and “functional shift”. A number of nouns such as paper, butter, bottle, vacation and so on, can via the process of conversion come to be used as verbs as in the following examples:

My brother is papering my bedroom.
Did you buttered this toast?
We bottled the home brew last night.
What is an Acronym?
Some new words known as acronyms are formed with the initial letters of a set of other words. Examples:

Compact Disk – CD
Video Cassette Recorder – VCR
National Aeronautics and Space Administration – NASA
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization – UNESCO
Personal Identification Number –PIN
Women against rape – WAR
What is Derivation?
Derivation is the most common word formation process and it accomplished by means of a large number of small bits of the English language which are not usually given separate listings in dictionaries. These small bits are called affixes. Examples:

Unhappy
Misrepresent
Prejudge
Joyful
Careless
Happiness
Prefixes and Suffixes
In the preceding group of words, it should be obvious that some affixes have to be added to the beginning of a word. These are called prefixes: unreliable. The other affix forms are called suffixes and are added at the end of the word: foolishness.

Infixes
One of the characteristics of English words is that any modifications to them occur at the beginning or the end

Saturday, 26 October 2019

Swift's "Gulliver's Travels": A social satire

Swift's "Gulliver's Travels": A social satire

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


“It stood prominent six feet, and could not be less than sixteen in circumference … spots and pimples that nothing could appear more nauseous.”
There is a man with a huge tumor in his neck; another beggar has wooden legs. But the most hateful sight is that of the lice crawling on their clothes. This description reinforces Swift views of the ugliness and foulness of the human body.
In the third voyage to Laputa, there is a satire on human intellect, human mind and on science, philosophy and mathematics. However, his satire is not very bitter. We are greatly amused by the useless experiments and researches, which are going on at the academy of Projectors in Lugado. Here scientists wants to extract sunbeams out of cucumbers, to convert human excrement into its original food, to build house from the roof downward to the foundation, to obtain silk from cobwebs and to produce books on various subjects by the use of machine without having to exert one’s brain.
“Their heads were inclined either to the right or to the left, one of their eyes turned inward, and the other directly up to Zenith.”
Swift amuses us by making a fun of the people whose sole interests are music and geometry.
“They made a lot of theories but practically nill.”
Swift here ridicules scientists, academics, planers, intellectual, in fact, all people who proceed, only according to theory which are useless when they come to actual practice. He satirizes historian and literary critics though Gulliver’s interviews with the ghosts of famous dead. The point f satire is that historian often distorts facts and literary critics often misinterpret great authors like Homer and Aristotle.
In the fourth voyage to Houyhnhnms, there is a bitter poignant satire on human moral shortcomings. Voyage contains some of the most corrosive and offensive satire on mankind. The description of the Yahoos given to us by Gulliver is regrettable.
“Yet I confess I never say any sensitive being so detestable on all accounts; and the more I came near them, the more hateful they grew.”
By contrast, the Houyhnhnms are noble and benevolent horses who are governed by reason and lead an ordered life. It is, indeed, a bitter criticism on the human race to be compared by the Houyhnhnms. The satire deepens when Gulliver gives an account, to the master Houyhnhnms, of the events in his country. He tells him that war in European countries was sometimes due to the ambition of kings and sometimes due to the corruption of the ministers. He speaks of the numerous deadly weapons, employed by European nations for destructive purposes. Many people in his country ruin themselves by drinking, gambling and debauchery and many are guilty of murders, theft, robbery, forgery and rape. The master speaks of the Yahoo’s love of shinning stones, their gluttony and their weakness for liquor. The master also speaks of the lascivious behaviour of the female Yahoos. By contrast, the Houyhnhnms are excellent beings.
“Here was neither physician to destroy my body not lawyer to ruin my fortune; no informer to watch my words and actions … here were no … backbiters, pickpockets, highwaymen, house-breakers … politicians, wits … murderers, robbers … no cheating shop-keeper or mechanics, no pride, vanity or affectation.”
They hold meetings at which the difficulties of their population are discussed and solved. They regulate their population and do not indulge in sexual intercourse merely for pleasure.
“Everything is calculated as the Plato’s Utopian land ‘The Republican’.”
Swift’s purpose here is to attribute to horses certain qualities which would normally be expected in human beings but which are actually lacking in them. Gulliver’s reaction o Houyhnhnms fills him so much admiration for them and with so much hatred and disgust for human beings that he has no desire even to return to his family.
Thus we see that “Gulliver’s Travels” is a great piece of art containing social satire in it. Every satirist is at heart a reformist. Swift, also, wants to reform the society by pinpointing the vices and shortcoming in it. And he very successfully satirizes on political tactics, physical awkwardness, intellectual fallacies and moral shortcomings.“Gulliver’s Travels” is a great work of social satire. Swift’s age was an age of smug complacency. Corruption was rampant and the people were still satisfied. Thus, Jonathan Swift tears the veil of smug complacency off which had blinded the people to realities. In “Gulliver’s Travels”, there is a satire on politics, human physiognomy, intellect, manners and morality.
In the first voyage to Lilliput, Swift satirizes on politics and political tactics practiced in England through Lilliputians, the dwarfs of six inches height. He satirizes the manner in which political offices were awarded by English King in his time. Flimnap, the Treasurer, represents Sir Robert Walpole who was the Prime Minister of England. Dancing on tight ropes symbolizes Walpole's skill in parliamentary tactics and political intrigues. The ancient temple, in which Gulliver is housed in Lilliput, refers to Westminster Hall in which Charles I was condemned to death. The three fine silk threads awarded as prizes to the winners refer to the various distinctions conferred by English King to his favourites. The Lilliputians were highly superstitious:
“They bury their dead with their head directly downwards because they hold an opinion that after eleven thousand moons they are all to rise again.”
Gulliver’s account of the annoyance of the Empress of Lilliput on extinguishing fire in her apartment is Swift’s satirical way of describing Queen Anne’s annoyance with him on writing “A Tale of a Tub”. Swift’s satire becomes amusing when Gulliver speaks of the conflict between the Big Endians and the Little Endians. In this account Swift is ridiculing the conflicts between the Roman Catholics and the Protestants. High Heel and Low Heel represent Whig and Tory – two political parties in England.
In the second voyage to Brobdingnag, there is a general satire on human body, human talents and human limitations. Gulliver gives us his reaction to the coarseness and ugliness of human body. When Gulliver gives an account, to the King of Brobdingnag, of the life in his own country, the trade, the wars, the conflicts in religion, the political parties, the king remarks that the history of Gulliver's country seems to be a series of conspiracies, rebellions, murders, revolutions and banishments etc. Kind condemns the fatal use of gunpowder and the books written on the act of governing. King mocks at the human race of which Gulliver is the agent.
“The most pernicious race of little odious vermin that nature ever suffered to crawl upon the surface of the earth.”
Swift here ridicules human pride and pretension. The sight is, indeed, horrible and disgusting. Among the beggars is a woman with a cancer in her breast.

Thursday, 24 October 2019

genres THE Cherry Orchard had ascribed

The following genres have all had The Cherry Orchard ascribed to them by some influential critic or playwright: Comedy, Drama, Tragedy, pastoral comedy, "Chekhovian comedy." The last genre was created specifically for the play, by Donald R. Styran; the term "pastoral" is a literary term usually denoting poems that are about shepherds, but according to Beverly Hahn, a "pastoral comedy" is the closest fit in terms of genre that The Cherry Orchard can manage. The first genre on the list is what Chekhov himself considered the play to be, as reflected in the play's subtitle: A Comedy in Four Acts. But Stanislavksy, the great director of the Moscow Arts Performing Theatre where the play was first produced, disagreed. He thought the play was a drama, and directed it as such. This annoyed Chekhov to no end. Especially irksome to the playwright was the way Stanislavsky stretched out the fourth Act to forty minutes in length, in order to heighten the emotional impact of Ranevsky's final departure. According to Chekhov, the Act should have lasted no more than twelve.

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


There is a fine line between pathos and comedy; as Richard Peace notes, they both involve the build-up and then release of emotional tension. The difference between is often dependent upon whether we closely sympathize with a given character's predicament or whether we maintain a certain distance from that predicament. The Cherry Orchard walks a fine line between the two. Where Chekhov may cross the line from comedy to pathos is in the amount of attention he gives to Ranevsky in terms of character development. She is, next to the orchard itself, the largest presence in the play, and thus draws the attention of readers. She is a sympathetic character, and furthermore is the one character who seems to escape the irony which distances us from the rest of the characters in the play. This has prompted some critics and readers have seen Ranevsky as a tragic hero. The play's structuring of time supports this interpretat

Discuss the elements of Modernism in Yeats' poetry.

Discuss the elements of Modernism in Yeats' poetry.

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


☘️☘️
William Butler Yeats (1865-1939) stands at the turning point between the Victorian period and Modernism, the conflicting currents of which affected his poetry. Yeats started his literary career as a romantic poet and gradually evolved into a modernist poet. He shifted his focus from Irish folklore to contemporary politics. His connection with the changes in literary culture in the early twentieth century led him to pick up some of the styles and conventions of the modernist poets. The modernists experimented with verse forms, wrote about politics, shifted away from conventions and traditions, and rejected the notion that poetry should simply be lyrical and beautiful. These influences caused his poetry to become darker, edgier, and more concise.
Yeats abandoned the conventional poetic diction of his early work in favour of unadorned language, verbal economy and more direct approach to his themes and subjects. His critical attitude made him one of the moderns. His later poetry and plays are written in a more personal element, and the works written in the last twenty years of his life include his musings on growing old.
Yeat's 'A Coat' is a self-dramatization of a stylistic change, he is casting off the old, rhetorical, ornate style of 'embroideries' for a new, simple, realistic style of 'walking naked'. The coat is romanticism that he is abandoning, and the naked state is the state of modernism he is adopting. It was a liberating poem for Yeats, since it showed him moving resolutely in a single stride from one poetic age to the next. He became more direct, truthful, terse and realistic. This poem showed that he had become increasingly self-critical and disillusioned with others.
Yeats eliminated poetic language, easy rhymes and rhythm and what he put in their place were the qualities evident in 'A Coat' --- conversational speech, irregular rhythms and imperfect rhymes, startlingly frank imagery, and above all honesty and a humility of tone. The poem is a juxtaposition of the poet being adorned with a coat and being naked.
The metaphor of the coat is complicated in that it involves an ambiguity which the reader is bound to struggle with. His 'coat' is a complex, multi-layered metaphor for the kind of poetic style he had previously, 'covered with embroideries/out of old mythologies/from heel to throat;'. The poem is a good example of free verse, a style popularly known to be modern. There is a personal element to the poem as well. Yeats wrote the poem as a response to an argument with George Moore, who accused Yeats of pretending to support Irish culture. The 'fools' in the poem are those who copied Yeats' style and 'wore it' as it was their own creation.
“An Acre of Grass”, written in 1939 when Yeats was 71, is increasingly personal as it describes how Yeats felt about growing old. The authors personal experiences form the center of this poem. Yeats is markedly preoccupied with the flesh and the decay,desolation and dullness that accompanies old age. The poem consists of several modern features such as unconventional metaphors, references such as Michelangelo and William Blake, and simple diction. There is a juxtaposition of ideas, such as 'old man's frenzy', and 'old man's eagle mind'. The tone of the poem is confessional.
Some of the examples of unconventional metaphors are the use of the word 'midnight' to refer to the end of days, end of life and darkness in life. Similarly, by 'an old house', Yeats means his own body which has suffered senility, it can also mean Yeats' life which has now come nearer to its end as the poet has grown old. The 'wall' that is mentioned in third stanza can mean the wall of classicism and tradition which limits the minds of men to following of rules and regulations. In the last line of the poem, the use of the word eagle is metaphorical since it represents clarity, sharpness of vision and goals of life, it is synonymous to the frenzy that the poet refers to. It can also mean that an old man's mind is as sharp as an eagle in the sense that he remembers every moment of his past, memories and regrets. 'The words 'picture' and 'book' refer to the peace, rest, poise, calm and serenity that was a part of his happy conjugal life with George Hyde-Lees in the Norman Towers. The word 'acre' has several meanings, it can refer to to the small plot of green land for fresh breath and exercise, it can also suggest confinement to a small space, metaphorically speaking, the confinement of the mind and body. It can also be taken as a reference to a grave, the final destination for someone who has reached old age like Yeats. The old house may recall the mind which has now become old due to the rest and calm. Timon, Lear and William Blake are the men who 'can pierce the clouds'. 'Pierce' is the antithesis of the diffuse, ineffectual thought of the 'loose imagination' of old men who do not possess frenzy. 'Mill' is reference to Blake's symbol of the mill which stands for the mechanical, repetitive routine of the industrial machine, but Yeats extends it to 'mill of the mind', that mode of habitual and uncreative thinking which he despised. The allusion of the word 'truth' is the understanding of the true spirit of the mind, it is the ability to do something new and inspiring, gain recognition or critical acclaim. Truth can also mean a position with the great frenzied minds of the past 'forgotten else by mankind'.
Most notably in his poems of 1920's, such as “Sailing to Byzantium”, Yeats displays many of the characteristics of modernist disenchantment: skepticism towards the notion of 'truth', a sense of the individual's disorientation within modernity and a pessimism over contemporary life combined with an understanding that the modern world has become spiritually bankrupt and culturally fragmented. Sailing to Byzantium proves to be the poet's long entertained concept of art by which he seeks to cure the malady of the 20th century life. The poem is an evidence of Yeat's excellence of art and symbolic interpretation of modern life . It contains subtle symbolism and a complexity of thought and style. The juxtaposition of concepts like nature vs. artifice, art vs. nature is apparent in the poem. The tension between art and life is a dichotomy in Yeats' poetry. The poem has many symbols, for example, the symbol of the 'gyre' in Yeat's poem shows his philosophical belief that all things could be described in terms of cycles and patterns. Similarly, the mackerels, salmons, fish and fowl symbolize morality and transience of life. The metaphors used for an aging body numerous, such as, 'a tattered coat upon a stick', 'tatter in its mortal dress', 'fastened to a dying animal'.
There is a political and personal reference of Ireland, the poet wishes to go back to a time when Ireland was a peaceful and economical country. “That” in the beginning of the poem is a reference to the Ireland of the contemporary time, or the modern era. The poem traces the speaker’s movement from youth to age, and the corresponding geographical move from Ireland, a country just being born as Yeats wrote, to Byzantium. Yeats felt that he no longer belonged in Ireland, as the young or the young in brutality, were caught up in what he calls “sensual music.” This is the allure of murder in the name of republicanism, which disgusted Yeats. 'The young/In one another's arms' and 'dying generations' possibly refers to the Irish Rebellion, when people suffered deaths and losses and had to part with their loved ones, thus saying goodbye through a last embrace.
Byzantium was the center of a successful civilization in the 6th century, it is a reference to the ancient city (previously named Constantinople) built by the Roman Emperor Constantine, it was the headquarters of Eastern Christianity. The city was believed to be a place where God existed. It was a place culturally rich and artistically Utopian in nature. Byzantium is far away, remote, exotic and has an added connotation of a spiritual and artistic center, it is also a metaphor for creativity or a platonic heaven of ideal forms of art.
The main theme of the poem is 'aging', a theme quite personal and common for Yeats' later poems. "An aged man is but a paltry thing,/ A tattered coat upon a stick." He renounces his almost-dead state and imaginatively "sailed the seas and come to the holy city of Byzantium."The speaker thinks that by escaping to Byzantium, he can escape the conflict between burning desire and a wasted body. The modern feature of realism is apparent here when Yeats likens an old man's body to a 'dying animal'.
Through his unceasing desire of escaping to the perfect land of Byzantium, Yeats is indirectly pointing at the imperfect land that he wishes to leave. One of the most common and important themes of Modern poetry, the degeneration and chaos of modern life is evident in this poem. Yeats is saying that the “Monuments of unageing intellect” cannot be produced in modern chaotic times. Line 6 of the poem, 'Whatever is begotten, born and dies' conveying the feelings of loss familiar to the modern poetry. Waste, death, decadence and crumbling of mortal beings is prevalent throughout the poem especially in association with old age.
Yeats invokes the holy "sages" to transform him, to "Consume my heart away; sick with desire/ And fastened to a dying animal" and "gather" him into the "artifice of eternity." Art (artifice) is the only thing that is immortal or eternal; human life is not eternal. It is thus the poet’s wish to be granted a body immune to death and to sing forever. Yeats' own note said: "I have read somewhere that in the Emperor's palace at Byzantium was a tree made of gold and silver, and artificial birds that sang" which would keep the Emperor awake. (2040) A fascination with the artificial as superior to the natural is one of Yeats' most prevalent themes. Yeats says that once he is out of his body he will never appear in the form of a natural thing again. The artificial is seen as perfect and permanent, while the natural objects or human body can decay and become ugly. At the same time Yeats is praising the 'Grecian goldsmiths' and the artisans of that time for creating such perfect and immortal golden birds that inspired him.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the modernism in Yeats' poetry is clear mainly through his use of simple language, metaphors having several interpretations, smybols, political references, allusions and juxtaposition of ideas. His themes, subjectivity and realism reveal his modernist style. Though Yeats straddles the line between Romanticism and Modernism, some of his later poems are considered the best representations of modern poetry.
REFERENCES
Pratt, William (1996); “Singing the Chaos: Madness and Wisdom in Modern Poetry”; University of Missouri Press; Columbia, USA. p.65
Childs, Peter (2008); “Modernism” ; Second Edition, Routledge, NY

Wednesday, 23 October 2019

Knight Gentleman Soldier - ppt video online download

Knight Gentleman Soldier - ppt video online download: Knight Gentleman Soldier Chivalrous Impressive military career Truthful battles, more than any other Honorable Generous Stained, dark tunic Courteous Not “gaily” dressed Wise, NOT boorish Possesses fine horses

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


Sunday, 20 October 2019

THE_WASTE_LAND - Thomas Stearns Eliot#Major_Themes_in_The_Waste_Land

#THE_WASTE_LAND - Thomas Stearns Eliot
#Major_Themes_in_The_Waste_Land
◼〰◼〰◼〰◼〰◼〰◼〰◼〰◼〰◼〰◼〰◼〰◼〰◼〰◼
#INTRODUCTION

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


-----------------------------
The masterpiece of T.S Eliot is a grand disconnection between classical and modern world. He very deeply and critically evaluates the inner of the man. This writing makes him an intellectual of man’s feelings and desires. It is one of the most effective poems which was written in the 20th century. 
The impact of the poem on the society was in a very great form. This poem makes the reader feel that T.S Eliot also had the power of dialectical poetry and this poem also proves him like a great saint.  Who had been sent to the world to purify the spirits?
#THE_WASTE_LAND_THEMES
---------------------------------------------------
•  #Religion_and_Cult
It is exposed that man has lost his cult, and now has no interest to follow the rules and regulation of the religion. Religion had become a useless thing for him. According to the modern man, religion disallows them to be facilitated with the modern facilitations.
Bible has now become a very bore book for them and nothing more than it. Curiosity has been ended about the religion, and nobody wants to make research on it.
•  #Gulf_Between_Past_and_Present
Past and present have had such a disconnection that it is felt now that the past was a separate world and the present is a separate world. The men have rudely cut the ropes which were the source of the connection to past and present. Impossibilities have been put in the way of the man to the past days. Past looks to be a dream and that is it.
•  #Lost_Culture
Culture is the recognition of a man. With the respect of the views of T.S Eliot about the modern man, culture has not vanished especially from the Christian communities. It’s not important to them what they are now and were they before.
Everyone wishes to have luxuries whether it is against their culture or to regenerate them. Because of these activities of the man the world has not only lost its cultures but has also lost the true colors of life. Tastelessness is everywhere.
•  #Anxiety
The man who was born in this world will have, no doubt, sadness, and grief. But T.S Eliot expresses that this sadness and this grief is because of giving up the past customs and rituals. The man is too much in tensions and has no time to solve their tensions.
•  #Materialism
Past was full of happiness, and the present is full of materialistic approach. Money has now become the God of man, and always he is in search of money that how to earn it and after that how to spend it. Rich men in the world are respected everywhere, whereas poor people have no value even money is being worshipped in all aspects of life. The person who has a lot of money is considered to be a messiah.
•  #Sex
An unravished girl has no importance in the present world. According to T.S Eliot nowadays a girl waits for her boyfriend on the beach and the boy reaches her, and they have sex with each other and complete their sexual lust and appetite. The girl or boy does not feel guilty for having sex without marriage. Even they feel proud after losing their purity. Lust for sex has become overcome.
•  #Critics_Views_on_The_Wasteland
Some critics criticise T.S Eliot that exaggeration is a device in the literary world which has been used by him. He considers the past a dream world which never existed. If we study the complete of T.S Eliot’s Waste Land, we conclude that the past of the man was a heavenly life. Whereas struggles, hurdles, and controversies were there in the past which was to be solved by the man.

Saturday, 19 October 2019

Lexical Studies"

"Lexical Studies"曆‍♂️‍♀️

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


· A "lexeme" is a word as an item of
meaning and is represented as a different headword in dictionaries.
· "Citation forms" of lexemes are the base forms and are normally used as the headword.
For example 'sing' NOT sings.
Irregular word forms often have separate entries. e.g. 'sung', 'feet', 'wore' etc.
· Homograph = same spelling, different pronunciation and meaning. (e.g. bow)
· Homophone = same pronunciation different spelling and meaning. (e.g. feet/feat)
· Homonym = same spelling and pronunciation
different meaning. (e.g. bank, ear). These are 2 different headwords in dictionaries.
· Polysemy = a word with a number of different senses of single meaning. (e.g row, foot). These are two variants of the same headword in dictionaries.
· The difference between homonyms and polysemous meanings is usually decided on
by etymology
(i.e. where the words come from).
· The craft of the lexicographer is
primarily the writing of definitions.
· Dictionary definitions are forms of
paraphrase (i.e. putting a word into other words
· ==Definitions can use==
(1) Hyponymy is a relation between two words
in which the meaning of one of the words
includes the meaning of the other word.
The lexical relation corresponding to the
inclusion of one class in another is
hyponymy.
A hyponym is a subordinate, specific term
whose referent is included in the referent
of super ordinate term.
E.g. Blue, Green are kinds of color. They
are specific colors and color is a general
term for them.
Therefore, color is called the super
ordinate term, and blue, red, green, yellow,
etc are called hyponyms
e.g. Cutlery has the hyponyms knife, fork and spoon. Spoon in turn has the
hyponyms teaspoon, tablespoon etc.
the hierarchial relationship between meanings of lexemes.)
2. Synonymy .
Synonymy is used to mean sameness of
meaning. Synonym is a word, which has the
same or nearly the same meaning as
another word. There are several ways in
which they differ
1.Some set of synonyms belong to different
dialects of language, e.g. Fall - used in
united states, Autumn-used in some western
countries.
2.There is a similar situation but are more
problematic one with words that are used in
different styles or registers.
3.Some words may be said to differ only in
their emotive or evaluative meanings.
4.Words are collocationally restricted they
occur only in conjunction with other words.
5.Synonyms are often said to differ only in
their connotation.
Examples-hid, conceal,
It is very hard to list absolute synonyms:
words, which are identical both in
denotation and connotation.
e.g. purpose - intention -
reason. ( = same or similar meanings). Strict
synonymy does NOT occur within a
language.
(3) Antonyms
The word antonymy derives from the greek
root anti(opposite) and denotes opposition
in meaning.
Antonymy or oppositeness of meaning has
long been recognized as one of the most
important semantic relations .e.g. quick-
slow, big-small, long-short, rich-poor, etc.
Antonyms are divided in to several
types-1.gradable antonyms/pairs,
2.nongradable antonyms/complementaries,
and  3.reversives
4.converse pairs
1.gradable antonyms/pairs-They can be
used in comparative constructions like
bigger than or smaller than, etc. Also the
negative of one member of the gradable
pair does not necessarily imply the
opposite. e.g.not hot does not mean cold.
2.nongradable antonyms/complementaries-
The relation of oppositeness is that which
holds between the pairs as single:married,
man:woman,etc.
The denial of one implies the assertion of
the other and the assertion of one implies
the denial of the other. It is the
characteristic of complimentaries.
3. reversives-It is important to avoid most
antonym pairs as one word meaning the
negative of another.e.g.tie-untie.
4.converse pairs –Another kind of antonymy
is forming converse pairs. e.g.
Converseness is used to refer to the
relationship between buy and sell.
(4) Metonymy
A metonym substitutes for the object that is
meant the name of an attribute or concept
associated with the object. The use of
‘crown’ for ‘king’ is an e.g. of metonymy.
This term has been derived from Greek
word meta means after and onoma means
substitution for name.
e.g. gray hair can be used for old age.
The distinction between metonymy and
metaphor is made in linguistics. For
instance, the phrase ‘to fish pearls’
metonymy is used and in the phrase ‘fishing
for information’ metaphor is used. In
cognitive linguistics, the word metonymy
stands for the use of one basic
characteristic to identify a more complex
entity. Metonymy according to American
Linguist Bloomfield is nearness in pace and
time.
More precisely it focuses on specific
aspects of objects having direct physical
association to what is being referred to.
(5)
Denotation. e.g. caviar : the salted roe of
a large fish. ( = description with attempted
objectivity)
(6)  Connotation . e.g. caviar : luxury, high
living and sumptuous food. ( = association which is necessarily subjective)
(7) . Componential Analysis. e.g. girl is
[+Human] [-Adult] [+Female]. ( = meanings of lexemes are analysed into componentswhich are compared across groups. It is, however, a limited form of analysis.
(8)  Collocation . = the combination of words
that have a certain high mutual expectancy.
Polysemous meanings are often related to the different collocations. e.g. strong in:
strong tea, a strong man, a strong
personality. There is collocational restriction imposed on some words. e.g. rancid with only butter or bacon. However, collocation
does not seem to be important in
dictionaries as it is not used systematically.

Friday, 18 October 2019

Hamlet: A Hero or a Coward:

Hamlet: A Hero or a Coward:

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


The question of whether or not Hamlet is a hero, is as perplexing as Hamlet himself. Hamlet, though possesses some incredibly heroic qualities; he is the chiefest bloom of the realm and the princely paragon of the state, yet the difficulty of this question is apparent when an audience considers that Hamlet can be seen as both hero and coward often in the same scene. The same character that lacks courage to carry out the revenge, also strives hard to be sure of his father’s murderer’s guilt and ensures that the revenge itself should be appropriate. His actions and often inactions do not allow a single interpretation of his character, often leaving the audience unsure of which Hamlet they are watching.
It would seem that Hamlet’s most cowardly behavior is in his treatment of Ophelia. He loves her yet is willing to manipulate her, as Gertrude, Claudius and her own father Polonius do. When he is free from the pressures of the royal family, and before the death of his father, Hamlet is able to tell Ophelia:
“Doubt thou the stars are fire/Doubt that the sun doth move /Doubt truth to be a liar/But never doubt I love.”
Hamlet is here a straightforward romantic hero and the audience is enthralled by his direct, unashamedly romantic words.
By the start of act three, his desire to avenge his father’s murder has made him suspicious some correctly. When he discovers that Ophelia has been collecting information for Polonius and Gertrude, he lashes out at calling her two-faced: “God has given you one face and you make yourselves another”. Hamlet’s heroism in being willing to destroy his love for Ophelia in pursuit of the truth could be said to be noble; but the audience struggles to align the brutality of his words to innocent Ophelia: “If thou dost marry I’ll give thee this plague for thy dowry/Be thou as chaste as ice, as pure as snow, thou shalt not escape calumny/Get thee to a nunnery.”
Hamlet is famed for his procrastination: his inability to act and this could indicate cowardice on his part, a reluctance to do what is right. Certainly this appears to be true when he himself witnesses Claudius’ confession of his guilt:
“O, my offence is rank it smells to heaven/It hath primal eldest curse upon it/A brother’s murder.”
With this confirmation Hamlet would seem free to enact the revenge as enjoined by his father’s ghost, yet he fails to act. The audience’s hopes for resolution are dashed to the ground.
Hamlet justifies his position by claiming that to kill Claudius after he has confessed his sins would release his soul to heaven; Hamlet does not do so, that he may suffer more at a later date. This single scene shows the difficulty of this question: on one hand Hamlet is cowardly by failing to carry out what he has resolved to do, yet on the other hand he can be seen in a more heroic way, in that he wishes his father’s revenge should be complete and perfect. The audience is ironically frustrated by his inertia and his Jekyll and Hyde heroism.
The most important speech in the play “To be or not to be” soliloquy is a meditation on whether Hamlet should commit suicide or not and on the virtues of life of thought and action. His desire to be released “from this mortal coil” is brought about by his refusal to accept the events as they have turned out — with his father dead and his mother married to his uncle. He proposes that to commit suicide is decisive action that may release him from his over-thinking that cripples him throughout the play. Conversely, the audience by now well versed in Hamlet’s weakness can see the idea as a cowardly attempt by the protagonist to run away from “the head-ache and thousand natural shocks/That flesh is heir to”.
Hamlet is acutely aware of his own weaknesses, and feels frustration at his inability to act. He passes judgment on himself saying that “thus conscious does make cowards of us all”, and the cost of contemplation is that we “lose the name of action”. Again his wisdom and ability to express universal truths, make him a more sympathetic character. It remains debatable, as to whether the audience could consider him heroic at this point.
It is interesting to note that two instances of Hamlet’s elusive action come about when he is not thinking; he is angry. We see this in the murder of Polonius, “How now! a rat? Dead for a ducat” and then at the climax of the play when he finally enacts his revenge, “…thou incestuous murderous damned Dane/Drink off this potion.” In these scenes the audience is enthralled by the justice carries out. Yet by acting without thinking, we are posed a difficult question: is justice to be served in a fit of anger or after appropriate contemplation? In this sense Hamlet is clearly not heroic as he is not in control of his actions. Ironically this is what makes him appear heroic to the audience: he has finally managed to shake off his inertia and do something. The right or wrong of his actions is almost a secondary consideration.
By the end of the play the audience cannot help but feel that Hamlet is a hero: he has killed his father’s murderer and also has sacrificed his life for the sake of truth. His faculty to deliver philosophical judgments like “What a piece of is a man! How noble in reason, how infinite in faculties . . . the beauty of the world, the paragon of animals — and yet to me what is this quintessence of dust?” and “There is a special providence in the fall of a sparrow”, make him a universal figure. It is only befitting that the noble hero falls to the beautiful heavenly benediction of Horatio:
“And flights of angels sing thee to thy rest.”

Mourning Becomes Electra Symbols

Mourning Becomes Electra Symbols,

TO JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY

VISIT THE LINKS BELOW


Symbol: The House
Most of the Mannons and the townspeople seem to hate the imposing edifice that is the Mannon house, but Christine voices this hate most emphatically: "Each time I come back it appears more like a sepulchre! The 'whited' one of the Bible—pagan temple stuck like a mask on Puritan gray ugliness!" (237). The house is thus a symbol of the Mannons themselves—closed, secretive, cruel, imposing, stately, austere, and masked.
Motif: Eyes
Eyes are everywhere in this text. The Mannons try to maintain their mask-like faces so no one can tell what they are thinking, and are consequently looking at everyone else's eyes to discern their thoughts. Ezra even asks Christine to close her eyes when he is trying to tell her his deepest feelings because he does not want to see either her apathy or disgust. The portraits also have eyes—eyes that frighten Christine, or fill Lavinia with conviction, or anger Orin.
Symbol: Islands
The Islands are a potent symbol. An island is separate from the mainland, isolated and thus generally "purer" and free from the deleterious effects of mainland civilization. The Blessed Isles in this novel are described as a warm, beautiful, dreamy paradise. They are more than that for the characters, though -they are a symbol of the womb, of a refuge, of a prelapsarian Eden, and of freedom.
Symbol: Hair
Christine, Lavinia, and Marie Brantome's hair, as it is in many poems and works of literature (see Baudelaire's poetry) symbolizes their femininity and sexual openness. The intriguing copper hue and the loose, lustrous flow entice and indicate all of the men in this play; Lavinia's choice to wear hers back at the beginning of the play suggests she is sexually frigid, but after she returns from the Islands she lets it down as a symbol of her newfound sexual openness.
Symbol/Motif: The Chanty
O'Neill chooses to portray Seth often singing "Shenandoah." As critic Jesse Weiner notes, "The shanty [Shenandoah] itself works as a symbol of death and contributes to the drama's motif of fate, since it is recited prior to Ezra's return and murder, immediately preceding the murder of Brant, again as Christine commits suicide, and finally just before the symbolic entombment of Lavinia."